基于遥感数据的大尺度区域水田空间格局及生态服务价值变化分析

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.2020.2.1.202001-SA002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

受经济和气候驱动，长江经济带水田空间格局发生了显著变化，影响区域粮食安全与生态安全。本研究基于1990-2015年土地利用遥感监测数据，利用GIS的空间分析功能，探究长江经济带水田空间格局动态变化特征，采用当量因子法计算生态系统服务价值（ESV），分析了水田变化的综合影响。结果表明：1）1990-2015年长江经济带水田规模持续缩减，共减少了17390km²，减幅呈增长态势具有显著地域差异，长江中上游与下游的水田减幅相差约为9.56%。其中下游减幅较大，水田占区域比例随之降低，中上游恰好相反。2）由于经济建设及水产养殖的发展，水田主要转化为建设用地和水系，水田主要由水系、旱地和湿地等转化而来。长江三角洲城市群、长江中游及成渝城市群的水田变化最为剧烈，建设用地侵占水田扩张的现象分布广泛，水田转为水系主要在两湖平原局部地区。3）水田与其他生态系统的转化对ESV是正影响，水田转为水系对此贡献最大，其转化规模决定了不同时期ESV净增量的大小，水系转化为水田损失的价值最多，建设用地侵占水田次之。不同市域的水田变化情况不一致，因此ESV增减情况具有明显差异。4）生态系统服务中水文调节、水资源供给增强的同时，食物生产、气体调节受到严重损害，与水资源规模扩大和水田资源大量流失有直接关系。研究结果有助于揭示长江流域水田的时空变化过程及其对各项生态系统服务的影响，可为区域土地利用规划、农业政策与生态可持续发展提供理论支持。

关键词: 水田, 生态系统服务价值, 长江经济带, 权衡协同, 时空变化, 遥感数据

Abstract:

Under the pressure of economy development and climate change, rice production and distribution in the Yangtze River basin have undergone great changes, which may pose a great threat to the ecological environment and food security. Based on land use remote sensing-monitoring data from1990 to 2015, the GIS spatial analysis method was used to explore the spatial pattern variation characteristics of paddy fields in the Yangtze River economic belt. Meanwhile, Ecosystem services value (ESV) was calculated by using the equivalent factor method corrected by region and time factor to measure the comprehensive impact of paddy field change. The results showed that, to begin with, paddy fields number of the Yangtze River economic belt continued to decrease, with a total decrease of 17 390km², and the decrease rate presented a trend of growth with significant regional differences. The difference between the reduction rate of paddy fields in the middle upper and the lower reaches of the Yangtze River was about 9.56%. Among them, in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, the proportion of paddy fields decreased, while in the middle and upper reaches which was just the opposite. Then, paddy fields mainly flowed to construction land and water, resulting from economic construction and aquaculture development. Paddy fields chiefly came from water, dry land and wetland, etc. Furthermore, paddy fields in the Yangtze River Delta, the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomerations changed the most dramatically. The expansion of construction land to paddy fields was widespread, and paddy fields flooded by water primarily distributed in the two lake plains. In addition, the conversion of paddy fields and other ecosystems had a positive impact on ESV, in which the paddy-water diversion type contributed the most. Its scale determined the net increase of ESV in different periods. Value loss lead by conversion from water to paddy fields was the largest, and construction land invading paddy fields was the second. The conversions in different cities were different, so the difference in ESV increases and decreases. In addition, the tradeoffs within ecosystem services were mainly between hydrological regulation, water supply and food production, gas regulation, which were directly related to the increase of water resources and the loss of paddy fields. The research results are helpful to reveal the spatio-temporal changes process of paddy fields in the Yangtze River basin and its impact on ecological functions, and provide theoretical support for regional land use planning, agricultural policy and ecological sustainable development.

Key words: paddy fields, ecosystem services value, the Yangtze river economic belt, tradeoffs, spatio-temporal changes, remote sensing data

中图分类号:

X171.1

刘园, 周清波, 余强毅, 吴文斌. 基于遥感数据的大尺度区域水田空间格局及生态服务价值变化分析[J]. 智慧农业（中英文）, 2020, 2(1): 43-57.

Liu Yuan, Zhou Qingbo, Yu Qiangyi, Wu Wenbin. Analysis of spatial pattern and ecological service value changes of large-scale regional paddy fields based on remote sensing data[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(1): 43-57.

参考文献

1	刘元亮, 李艳, 吴剑亮. 基于LSWI和NDVI时间序列的水田信息提取研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2015, 31(3): 32-37, 2.
1	Liu Y, Li Y, Wu J. Study on extraction of paddy fields based on LSWI and time series NDVI[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2015, 31(3): 32-37, 2.
2	Xiao X, Boles S, Frolking S, et al. Mapping paddy rice agriculture in South and Southeast Asia using multi-temporal MODIS images[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006, 100(1): 95-113.
3	Natuhara Y. Ecosystem services by paddy fields as substitutes of natural wetlands in Japan[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 56: 97-106.
4	王兴, 赵鑫, 王钰乔, 等. 中国水稻生产的碳足迹分析[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(04): 713-722.
4	Wang X, Zhao X, Wang Y, et al. Assessment of the carbon footprint of rice production in China[J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(04): 713-722.
5	陈仲新, 郝鹏宇, 刘佳, 等. 农业遥感卫星发展现状及我国监测需求分析[J]. 智慧农业, 2019, 1(1): 32-42.
5	Chen Z, Hao P, Liu J, et al. Technical demands of agricultural remote sensing satellites in China[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2019, 1(1): 32-42.
6	张文琦, 宋戈. 三江平原典型区水田时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(6): 244-252.
6	Zhang W, Song G. Spatial-temporal variations and driving factor analysis of paddy fields in typical regions of Sanjiang Plain[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019, 35(6): 244-252.
7	Power A G. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies[J]. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 2010, 365(1554): 2959-2971.
8	Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 152-158.
9	高奇, 师学义, 黄勤, 等. 区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2013, 23(S2): 308-312.
9	Gao Q, Shi X, Huang Q, et al. Ecosystem service value respond to regional land use change[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(S2): 308-312.
10	Lawler J J, Lewis D J, Erik N, et al. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(20): 7492-7497.
11	Yan F, Zhang S, Su F. Variations in ecosystem services in response to paddy expansion in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China[J]. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2019, 17(2): 158-171.
12	Yu X, Kai A, Gaodi X, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services provided by 10 typical rice paddies in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2011, 2(4): 328-337.
13	刘利花, 尹昌斌, 钱小平. 稻田生态系统服务价值测算方法与应用——以苏州市域为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(1): 92-99.
13	Liu L, Yin C, Qian X. Calculation methods of paddy ecosystem service value and application: a case study of Suzhou City[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(1): 92-99.
14	刘珍环, 李正国, 唐鹏钦, 等. 近30年中国水稻种植区域与产量时空变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(5): 680-693.
14	Liu Z, Li Z, Tang P, et al. Spatial-temporal changes of rice area and production in China during 1980-2010[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(5): 680-693.
15	王品, 魏星, 张朝, 等. 气候变暖背景下水稻低温冷害和高温热害的研究进展[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(11): 2316-2326.
15	Wang P, Wei X, Zhang Z, et al. A review of cold injury and heat damage to rice growth under global warming[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(11): 2316-2326.
16	刘园, 周勇. 长江经济带生态系统服务价值时空变化特征分析及灰色预测[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(4): 196-201.
16	Liu Y, Zhou Y. Spatiotemporal dynamics and grey forecast of ecosystem services value in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35(4): 196-201.
17	杨桂山, 徐昔保, 李平星. 长江经济带绿色生态廊道建设研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11): 1356-1367.
17	Yang G, Xu X, Li P, Research on the construction of green ecological corridors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(11): 1356-1367.
18	吴丹, 邹长新, 林乃峰, 等. 长江经济带生态系统宏观结构变化特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(6): 499-503.
18	Wu D, Zou C, Lin N, et al. Characteristic analysis of ecosystem spatial pattern and structure in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(6): 499-503.
19	李裕瑞, 杨乾龙, 曹智. 长江经济带农业发展的现状特征与模式转型[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11): 1458-1469.
19	Li Y, Yang Q, Cao Z. Current status and pattern transformation of agricultural development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(11): 1458-1469.
20	刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 等. 20世纪80年代以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局 [J]. 地理学报, 2014, 24(2): 195-210.
20	Liu J, Kuang W, Zhang Z, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 24(2): 195-210.
21	刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010-2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.
21	Liu J, Ning J, Kuang W, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010-2015[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.
22	Costanza R, Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
23	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
23	Xie G, Zhang C, Zhang L, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resourses, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
24	Zhang L, Yu X, Jiang M, et al. A consistent ecosystem services valuation method based on total economic value and equivalent value factors: A case study in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2017, 29: 40-48.
25	谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003，18(2): 189-196.
25	Xie G, Lu C, Leng Y, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2003, 18(2): 189-196.
26	王航, 秦奋, 朱筠, 等. 土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(4): 1286-1296.
26	Wang H, Qin F, Zhu J, et al. The effects of land use structure and landscape pattern change on ecosystem service values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(4): 1286-1296.
27	夏淑芳, 陈美球, 刘馨, 等. 基于地理国情信息的赣州市土地生态系统服务价值核算[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(6): 184-193.
27	Xia S, Chen M, Liu X, et al. Land resources ecosystem service value accounting of Ganzhou city based on geographic national condition information[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019, 50(6): 184-193.
28	赵育恒, 曾晨. 武汉城市圈生态服务价值时空演变分析及影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1426-1440.
28	Zhao Y, Zeng C. Analysis of spatial-temporal evolution and factors that influences ecological service values in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4) : 1426-1440．
29	Takeuchi K. Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: the Satoyama Initiative[J]. Ecological Research, 2010, (25): 891-897.
30	Wood S A, Karp D S, DeClerck F, et al. Functional traits in agriculture: Agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2015, 30(9): 531-539.
31	Elmqvist T, Fragkias M， Goodness J， et al. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities[M]. Springer, 2013.