欢迎您访问《智慧农业(中英文)》官方网站! English

Smart Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 226-238.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202601030

• 专刊--数字技术赋能与农业经济范式转型 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字物流驱动农业产业链现代化的作用机制及溢出效应研究

程云洁, 孙千驰()   

  1. 新疆财经大学经济学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830012,中国
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-23 出版日期:2026-05-30
  • 基金项目:
    国家社会科学基金项目(22BGL165); 新疆社会科学基金项目(2024BJL043)
  • 作者简介:

    程云洁,硕士,教授,研究方向为世界经济、区域经济。E-mail:

  • 通信作者:
    孙千驰,博士研究生,研究方向为区域经济。E-mail:

Mechanism and Spillover Effects of Digital Logistics Driving the Modernization of the Agricultural Industry Chain

CHENG Yunjie, SUN Qianchi()   

  1. School of Economics, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China
  • Received:2026-01-23 Online:2026-05-30
  • Foundation items:The National Social Science Fund of China(22BGL165); Xinjiang Social Science Foundation Project(2024BJL043)
  • About author:

    CHENG Yunjie, E-mail:

  • Corresponding author:
    SUN Qianchi, E-mail:

摘要:

【目的/意义】 实证检验数字物流影响农业产业现代化的作用机制及溢出效应,拓展农业产业链现代化研究的分析维度,为促进区域协调发展和城乡融合发展提供新思路。 【方法】 基于2011—2023年中国280个地级市的面板数据,利用熵值法测算数字物流与农业产业链现代化,采用固定效应模型探究数字物流与农业产业链现代化之间的关系;利用中介效应模型以及空间杜宾模型分别对数字物流影响农业产业链现代化的作用机制以及空间相关性特征和溢出效应进行检验分析。 【结果和讨论】 (1)数字物流有助于推进农业产业链现代化进程,在经过一系列稳健性检验及内生性处理后,该结论依旧有效。(2)机制结果显示,数字物流能够通过促进资源配置效率、市场可达性,以及创业活跃度推动农业产业链现代化。(3)异质性检验结果表明,数字物流对于南部地区、在非粮食主产区、农业产业集聚高的地区的农业产业链现代化促进效果更强。(4)空间效应结果显示数字物流在0~600 km空间溢出效应逐渐从抑制转变为促进作用,800 km正向空间溢出效应最大。 【结论】 提出强化数智技术赋能、破除“制度性障碍”、消除资源配置效率提升的外部壁垒,以及因地制宜发挥数字物流优化各产区农业产业链现代化的作用等对策。

关键词: 数字物流, 农业产业链现代化, 资源配置效率, 市场可达性, 创业活跃度, 中介效应模型

Abstract:

[Objective] Enhancing the modernization level of China's agricultural industry chain and supply chain is a crucial strategy for enabling the high-quality development of the rural economy. In the context of digital transformation, understanding the role of digital logistics in this process is of paramount importance. The purpose of this research is to systematically investigate the impact, mechanisms, heterogeneity, and spatial spillover effects of digital logistics on the modernization of the agricultural industry chain. [Methods] Panel data from 280 prefecture-level cities in China spanning the period from 2011 to 2023 were used as the basis for this research. Firstly, the entropy method was employed to construct comprehensive measurement indices for digital logistics and the modernization level of the agricultural industry chain. To empirically examine the relationship between digital logistics and agricultural industry chain modernization, a panel fixed-effects model was utilized. Furthermore, a mediation effect model was constructed to explore the underlying mechanisms through which digital logistics exerts its influence. Finally, to account for spatial interdependence, a spatial Durbin model (SDM) was applied to analyze the spatial correlation characteristics and spillover effects of digital logistics on agricultural industry chain modernization. [Results and Discussions] The empirical analysis yielded several key findings: (1) Baseline effect: Digital logistics significantly contributed to advancing the modernization of the agricultural industry chain. This positive effect remained robust and valid after a series of rigorous robustness checks, including substituting variables, adjusting sample periods, and excluding particular cities, as well as after addressing potential endogeneity concerns through instrumental variable methods. (2) Mechanism analysis: The mediation effect analysis revealed that digital logistics promoted agricultural industry chain modernization through three primary channels of improving resource allocation efficiency, enhancing market accessibility, and boosting entrepreneurial activity. Specifically, digital logistics reduced information asymmetry and transaction costs, leading to a more efficient distribution of production factors; extended market reach for agricultural products; and lowered entry barriers, stimulating local entrepreneurship. (3) Heterogeneity analysis: The impact of digital logistics was not uniform across different regions. The heterogeneity test results demonstrated that the promoting effect of digital logistics on agricultural industry chain modernization was significantly stronger in the southern region compared to the northern region. Additionally, the effect was more pronounced in non-major grain-producing areas than in major grain-producing areas. Regarding the level of agricultural agglomeration, the positive impact of digital logistics was greater in regions with a high degree of agricultural industry agglomeration, suggesting that the benefits of digital logistics were amplified in areas with established industrial clusters. (4) Spatial spillover effects: The spatial econometric analysis revealed a non-linear spatial spillover pattern. The results indicated that the spatial spillover effect of digital logistics on the modernization of the agricultural industry chain in neighboring regions shifted from a negative effect to a positive effect as the spatial distance increased. This transition was observed approximately within the range of 0 to 600 km. Notably, the largest positive spatial spillover effect was detected at a distance of around 800 km, implying that the beneficial impacts of digital logistics in one city could significantly enhance the agricultural industry chain modernization of other cities located approximately 800 km away. [Conclusions] Based on these findings, several policy recommendations are proposed. First, it is essential to strengthen the empowerment of digital and intelligent technologies within the agricultural logistics system. Second, efforts should be made to dismantle "institutional barriers" and eliminate external obstacles that hinder the improvement of resource allocation efficiency. Third, policies should be tailored to local conditions, leveraging the role of digital logistics in optimizing the modernization of the agricultural industry chain according to the specific characteristics of different production areas.

Key words: digital logistics, modernization of the agricultural industry chain, resource allocation efficiency, market accessibility, entrepreneurial activity, mediation effect model

中图分类号: