Welcome to Smart Agriculture 中文
Overview Article

Research Application of Artificial Intelligence in Agricultural Risk Management: A Review

  • GUI Zechun ,
  • ZHAO Sijian
Expand
  • Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
GUI Zechun, E-mail:guizechun2022@163.com
ZHAO Sijian, E-mail:zhaosijian@caas.cn

Received date: 2022-11-11

  Online published: 2023-04-14

Supported by

The Science and Technology Innovation Engineering Project of the Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2016-AII); Major Project of the Key Research Base for Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education (17JJD910002); National Natural Science Foundation General Project (41471426)

Abstract

Agriculture is a basic industry deeply related to the national economy and people's livelihood, while it is also a weak industry. There are some problems with traditional agricultural risk management research methods, such as insufficient mining of nonlinear information, low accuracy and poor robustness. Artificial intelligence(AI) has powerful functions such as strong nonlinear fitting, end-to-end modeling, feature self-learning based on big data, which can solve the above problems well. The research progress of artificial intelligence technology in agricultural vulnerability assessment, agricultural risk prediction and agricultural damage assessment were first analyzed in this paper, and the following conclusions were obtained: 1. The feature importance assessment of AI in agricultural vulnerability assessment lacks scientific and effective verification indicators, and the application method makes it impossible to compare the advantages and disadvantages of multiple AI models. Therefore, it is suggested to use subjective and objective methods for evaluation; 2. In risk prediction, it is found that with the increase of prediction time, the prediction ability of machine learning model tends to decline. Overfitting is a common problem in risk prediction, and there are few researches on the mining of spatial information of graph data; 3. Complex agricultural production environment and varied application scenarios are important factors affecting the accuracy of damage assessment. Improving the feature extraction ability and robustness of deep learning models is a key and difficult issue to be overcome in future technological development. Then, in view of the performance improvement problem and small sample problem existing in the application process of AI technology, corresponding solutions were put forward. For the performance improvement problem, according to the user's familiarity with artificial intelligence, a variety of model comparison method, model group method and neural network structure optimization method can be used respectively to improve the performance of the model; For the problem of small samples, data augmentation, GAN (Generative Adversarial Network) and transfer learning can often be combined to increase the amount of input data of the model, enhance the robustness of the model, accelerate the training speed of the model and improve the accuracy of model recognition. Finally, the applications of AI in agricultural risk management were prospected: In the future, AI algorithm could be considered in the construction of agricultural vulnerability curve; In view of the relationship between upstream and downstream of agricultural industry chain and agriculture-related industries, the graph neural network can be used more in the future to further study the agricultural price risk prediction; In the modeling process of future damage assessment, more professional knowledge related to the assessment target can be introduced to enhance the feature learning of the target, and expanding the small sample data is also the key subject of future research.

Cite this article

GUI Zechun , ZHAO Sijian . Research Application of Artificial Intelligence in Agricultural Risk Management: A Review[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023 , 5(1) : 82 -98 . DOI: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202211004

References

1 BENAMI E, JIN Z N, CARTER M R, et al. Uniting remote sensing, crop modelling and economics for agricultural risk management[J]. Nature reviews earth & environment, 2021, 2(2): 140-159.
2 赵思健, 张峭. 东北三省农作物洪涝时空风险评估[J]. 灾害学, 2013, 28(3): 54-60.
  ZHAO S J, ZHANG Q. Spatial-temporal risk assessment of crops caused by flood in the three northeastern provinces of China[J]. Journal of catastrophology, 2013, 28(3): 54-60.
3 CHEN W, JIANG Y. Application of Markov Model-Based IoT in Agricultural Insurance and Risk Management[J]. Mobile information systems, 2021, 2021: 1-8.
4 WANG C L, GAO Y W, AZIZ A, et al. Agricultural disaster risk management and capability assessment using big data analytics[J]. Big data, 2022, 10(3): 246-261.
5 刘学文. 中国农业风险管理研究——基于完善农业风险管理体系的视角[D]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2014.
  LIU X W. The analysis on agriculture's risk management in China— From the perspective of improving the agriculture's risk management system[D]. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 2014.
6 GHAFFARIAN S, VAN DER VOORT M, VALENTE J, et al. Machine learning-based farm risk management: A systematic mapping review[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 192: ID 106631.
7 张峭, 王克, 汪必旺, 等. 农业风险综合管理: 一个理论框架[J]. 农业展望, 2016, 12(3): 59-65.
  ZHANG Q, WANG K, WANG B W, et al. Integrated risk management in agriculture: A theoretical framework[J]. Agricultural outlook, 2016, 12(3): 59-65.
8 别得进, 朱秀芳, 赵安周, 等. 农业旱灾脆弱性研究综述[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 51(S1): 62-69.
  BIE D J, ZHU X F, ZHAO A Z, et al. Assessment of agricultural drought vulnerability: A review[J]. Journal of Beijing normal university (natural science), 2015, 51(S1): 62-69.
9 PARKER L, BOURGOIN C, MARTINEZ-VALLE A, et al. Vulnerability of the agricultural sector to climate change: The development of a pan-tropical Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment to inform sub-national decision making[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(3): ID e0213641.
10 PATHAK T, MASKEY M, DAHLBERG J, et al. Climate change trends and impacts on California agriculture: A detailed review[J]. Agronomy, 2018, 8(3): ID 25.
11 YANG W, XU K, LIAN J, et al. Integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach based on TOPSIS and Shannon entropy methods[J]. Ecological indicators, 2018, 89: 269-280.
12 谢家智, 车四方, 林涌. 农业旱灾风险管理脆弱性评价及驱动因素分析[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43(3): 43-53, 189.
  XIE J Z, CHE S F, LIN Y. Vulnerability assessment and the driving force in the management of agricultural drought hazard[J]. Journal of southwest university (social sciences edition), 2017, 43(3): 43-53, 189.
13 HANADé HOUMMA I, MANSOURI LEL, GADAL S, et al. Modelling agricultural drought: A review of latest advances in big data technologies[J]. Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 2022, 13(1): 2737-2776.
14 TAMAGNO S, EAGLE A J, MCLELLAN E L, et al. Predicting nitrate leaching loss in temperate rainfed cereal crops: Relative importance of management and environmental drivers[J]. Environmental research Letters, 2022, 17(6): ID 064043.
15 ABDALLAH EBEN, GRATI R, BOUKADI K. A machine learning-based approach for smart agriculture via stacking-based ensemble learning and feature selection methods[C]// 2022 18th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 1-8.
16 LI Y, GONG S Y, ZHANG Z R, et al. Vulnerability evaluation of rainstorm disaster based on ESA conceptual framework: A case study of Liaoning province, China[J]. Sustainable cities and society, 2021, 64: ID 102540.
17 DENG X Y, WANG G Q, YAN H F, et al. Spatial–temporal pattern and influencing factors of drought impacts on agriculture in China[J]. Frontiers in environmental science, 2022, 10: ID 820615.
18 KINNUNEN P, HEINO M, SANDSTR?M V, et al. Crop yield loss risk is modulated by anthropogenic factors[J]. Earth's future, 2022, 10(9): ID e2021EF002420.
19 孙鹏, 刘果镍, 梁媛媛, 等. 基于机器学习算法的安徽省农业旱灾风险动态评估[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2022, 53(5): 22-35.
  SUN P, LIU G N, LIANG Y Y, et al. Machine learning algorithm-based dynamic assessment of agricultural drought dangerousness in Anhui province[J]. Water resources and hydropower engineering, 2022, 53(5): 22-35.
20 SAMUEL J, RAO C A R, RAJU B M K, et al. Assessing the impact of climate resilient technologies in minimizing drought impacts on farm incomes in drylands[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 14(1): ID 382.
21 刘伟, 徐洁, 黎洁. 陕南易地扶贫搬迁农户生计脆弱性研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(10): 2002-2014.
  LIU W, XU J, LI J. Livelihood vulnerability of rural households under poverty alleviation relocation in southern Shaanxi, China[J]. Resources science, 2018, 40(10): 2002-2014.
22 MELKETO T, SCHMIDT M, BONATTI M, et al. Determinants of pastoral household resilience to food insecurity in a far region, northeast Ethiopia[J]. Journal of arid environments, 2021, 188: ID 104454.
23 和月月, 周常春. 贫困地区农户生计脆弱性评价及影响因素分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(19): 70-74.
  HE Y Y, ZHOU C C. Vulnerability evaluation and influencing factors analysis of farmers' livelihood in poverty-stricken areas[J]. Statistics & decision, 2020, 36(19): 70-74.
24 SAHA T K, PAL S. Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee River Basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches[J]. Ecological indicators, 2019, 98: 251-265.
25 ROY P, PAL S C, CHAKRABORTTY R, et al. Climate change and groundwater overdraft impacts on agricultural drought in India: Vulnerability assessment, food security measures and policy recommendation[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 849: ID 157850.
26 张帅, 董会忠, 曾文霞. 土地生态系统脆弱性时空演化特征及影响因素——以黄河三角洲高效生态经济区为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(4): 1696-1704.
  ZHANG S, DONG H Z, ZENG W X. The time-space evolution characteristics of the vulnerability of land ecosystems and influencing factors: A case study of the Yellow River Delta Efficiency Eco-economic Zone[J]. China environmental science, 2019, 39(4): 1696-1704.
27 SAHA S, KUNDU B, SAHA A, et al. Manifesting deep learning algorithms for developing drought vulnerability index in monsoon climate dominant region of West Bengal, India[J]. Theoretical and applied climatology, 2023, 151(1): 891-913.
28 苏芳, 李景坤, 许韶华. 基于BP神经网络的农户生计风险评价模型[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(6): 1381-1390.
  SU F, LI J K, XU S H. An assessment model of farmer livelihood risk based on BP neural network[J]. Journal of glaciology and geocryology, 2017, 39(6): 1381-1390.
29 KIRASICH K, SMITH T, SADLER B. Random forest vs logistic regression: Binary classification for heterogeneous datasets[J]. SMU Data science review, 2018, 1(3): ID 9.
30 FUNG K F, HUANG Y F, KOO C H, et al. Improved SVR machine learning models for agricultural drought prediction at downstream of Langat River Basin, Malaysia[J]. Journal of water and climate change, 2020, 11(4): 1383-1398.
31 SUTANTO S J, VAN DER WEERT M, WANDERS N, et al. Moving from drought hazard to impact forecasts[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1): 1-7.
32 李航. 统计学习方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2012.
  LI H. Statistical learning method[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2012.
33 VAN KLOMPENBURG T, KASSAHUN A, CATAL C. Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020, 177: ID 105709.
34 HE L L, FANG W T, ZHAO G N, et al. Fruit yield prediction and estimation in orchards: A state-of-the-art comprehensive review for both direct and indirect methods[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 195: ID 106812.
35 PRODHAN F A, ZHANG J H, HASAN S S, et al. A review of machine learning methods for drought hazard monitoring and forecasting: Current research trends, challenges, and future research directions[J]. Environmental modelling & software, 2022, 149: ID 105327.
36 DOMINGUES T, BRAND?O T, FERREIRA J C. Machine learning for detection and prediction of crop diseases and pests: A comprehensive survey[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): ID 1350.
37 RADO?AJ D, JURI?I? M. GIS-based cropland suitability prediction using machine learning: A novel approach to sustainable agricultural production[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(9): ID 2210.
38 ZOUNEMAT-KERMANI M, BATELAAN O, FADAEE M, et al. Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2021, 598: ID 126266.
39 PEI F S, LI X, LIU X P, et al. Assessing the impacts of droughts on net primary productivity in China[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2013, 114: 362-371.
40 HA T V, HUTH J, BACHOFER F, et al. A review of earth observation-based drought studies in southeast Asia[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(15): ID 3763.
41 PRODHAN F A, ZHANG J H, YAO F M, et al. Deep learning for monitoring agricultural drought in South Asia using remote sensing data[J]. Remote sensing, 2021, 13(9): ID 1715.
42 PARK S, SEO E, KANG D, et al. Prediction ofdrought on pentad scale using remote sensing data and MJO index through random forest over East Asia[J]. Remote sensing, 2018, 10(11): ID 1811.
43 ZHANG Q, SHI R, SINGH V P, et al. Droughts across China: Drought factors, prediction and impacts[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 803: ID 150018.
44 LI J, WANG Z L, WU X S, et al. Robust meteorological drought prediction using antecedent SST fluctuations and machine learning[J]. Water resources research, 2021, 57(8): ID e2020WR029413.
45 张建海, 张棋, 许德合, 等. ARIMA-LSTM组合模型在基于SPI干旱预测中的应用——以青海省为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 1004-1013.
  ZHANG J H, ZHANG Q, XU D H, et al. Application of a combined ARIMA-LSTM model based on SPI for the forecast of drought: A case study in Qinghai province[J]. Arid land geography, 2020, 43(4): 1004-1013.
46 WANG Y, HONG H Y, CHEN W, et al. Flood susceptibility mapping in Dingnan County (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2019, 247: 712-729.
47 VENKATESAN E, MAHINDRAKAR A B. Forecasting floods using extreme gradient boosting: A new approach[J]. International journal of civil engineering and technology, 2019, 10(2): 1336-1346.
48 MIRZAEI S, VAFAKHAH M, PRADHAN B, et al. Flood susceptibility assessment using extreme gradient boosting (EGB), Iran[J]. Earth science informatics, 2021, 14(1): 51-67.
49 TABBUSSUM R, DAR A Q. Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms—Artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2021, 28(20): 25265-25282.
50 ZHANG K, NIU J F, LI X, et al. Comparison of artificial intelligence flood forecasting models in China's semi-arid and semi-humid regions[J]. Water resources protection, 2021, 37(1): 28-35.
51 EBRAHIMI M, MOHAMMADI-DEHCHESHMEH M, EBRAHIMIE E, et al. Comprehensive analysis of machine learning models for prediction of sub-clinical mastitis: Deep learning and Gradient-boosted trees outperform other models[J]. Computers in biology and medicine, 2019, 114: ID 103456.
52 TEIXEIRA V A, LANA A M Q, BRESOLIN T, et al. Using rumination and activity data for early detection of anaplasmosis disease in dairy heifer calves[J]. Journal of dairy science, 2022, 105(5): 4421-4433.
53 CASELLA E, CANTOR M C, SILVESTRI S, et al. Cost-aware inference of bovine respiratory disease in calves using precision livestock technology[C]// 2022 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems(DCOSS). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 109-116.
54 AHMED G, MALICK R A S, AKHUNZADA A, et al. An approach towards IoT-based predictive service for early detection of diseases in poultry chickens[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(23): ID 13396.
55 陈英义, 程倩倩, 方晓敏, 等. 主成分分析和长短时记忆神经网络预测水产养殖水体溶解氧[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17): 183-191.
  CHEN Y Y, CHENG Q Q, FANG X M, et al. Principal component analysis and long short-term memory neural network for predicting dissolved oxygen in water for aquaculture[J]. Transactions of the Chinese society of agricultural engineering, 2018, 34(17): 183-191.
56 郝玉莹, 赵林, 孙同, 等. 基于RF-LSTM的地表水体水质预测[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2021, 32(6): 41-48.
  HAO Y Y, ZHAO L, SUN T, et al. Surface water quality prediction based on RF-LSTM[J]. Journal of water resources and water engineering, 2021, 32(6): 41-48.
57 JHA G, SINHA K. Agricultural price forecasting using neural network model: An innovative information delivery system[J]. Agricultural economics research review, 2013, 26(347-2016-17087): 229-239.
58 PAUL R K, YEASIN M, KUMAR P, et al. Machine learning techniques for forecasting agricultural prices: A case of brinjal in Odisha, India[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(7): ID e0270553.
59 ZHANG D B, CHEN S Y, LING L W, et al. Forecasting agricultural commodity prices using model selection framework with time series features and forecast horizons[J]. IEEE access, 2020, 8: 28197-28209.
60 吕逸鹏, 林旭东. 基于分类模型的生猪价格预测[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2020, 56(12): 215-219.
  LYU Y P, LIN X D. Pork price prediction based on classification model[J]. Chinese journal of animal science, 2020, 56(12): 215-219.
61 许钰林, 康孟珍, 王秀娟, 等. 基于深度学习的玉米和大豆期货价格智能预测[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(4): 156-163.
  XU Y L, KANG M Z, WANG X J, et al. Corn and soybean futures price intelligent forecasting based on deep learning[J]. Smart agriculture, 2022, 4(4): 156-163.
62 WONGCHAI A, JENJETI D R, PRIYADARSINI A I, et al. Farm monitoring and disease prediction by classification based on deep learning architectures in sustainable agriculture[J]. Ecological modelling, 2022, 474: ID 110167.
63 XING L W, CUI N B, LIU C W, et al. Estimation of daily apple tree transpiration in the Loess Plateau region of China using deep learning models[J]. Agricultural water management, 2022, 273: ID 107889.
64 VENKATACHALAM K, TROJOVSKY P, PAMUCAR D, et al. DWFH: An improved data-driven deep weather forecasting hybrid model using Transductive Long Short Term Memory (T-LSTM)[J]. Expert systems with applications, 2023, 213: ID 119270.
65 WANG J A, SI H P, GAO Z, et al. Winter wheat yield prediction using an LSTM model from MODIS LAI products[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(10): ID 1707.
66 ZHANG L, CAI Y Y, HUANG H L, et al. A CNN-LSTM model for soil organic carbon content prediction with long time series of MODIS-based phenological variables[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(18): ID 4441.
67 LIU Y Q, ZHANG Q, SONG L H, et al. Attention-based recurrent neural networks for accurate short-term and long-term dissolved oxygen prediction[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2019, 165: ID 104964.
68 CELIK M F, ISIK M S, YUZUGULLU O, et al. Soil moisture prediction from remote sensing images coupled with climate, soil texture and topography via deep learning[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(21): ID 5584.
69 ZHUANG J Y, XU S W, LI G Q, et al. Intelligentdecision method of multi-agricultural commodity model based on machine learning[J]. International journal of pattern recognition and artificial intelligence, 2022, 36(8): ID 2251003.
70 刘忠雨, 李彦霖, 周洋. 深入浅出图神经网络: GNN 原理解析[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2020.
  LIU Z Y, LI Y L, ZHOU Y. Learning graph neural network[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2020.
71 ZHOU J, CUI G Q, HU S D, et al. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications[J]. AI open, 2020, 1: 57-81.
72 ZHOU Y, ZHENG H X, HUANG X, et al. Graph neural networks: Taxonomy, advances, and trends[J]. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology, 2022, 13(1): ID 15.
73 LACHAUD G, CONDE-CESPEDES P, TROCAN M. Mathematical expressiveness of graph neural networks[J]. Mathematics, 2022, 10(24): ID 4770.
74 LI P P, HAO H J, ZHANG Z, et al. A field study to estimate heavy metal concentrations in a soil-rice system: Application of graph neural networks[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 832: ID 155099.
75 ZENG H W, ZHU Q, DING Y L, et al. Graph neural networks with constraints of environmental consistency for landslide susceptibility evaluation[J]. International journal of geographical information science, 2022, 36(11): 2270-2295.
76 KIM R, SO C H, JEONG M, et al. Hats: A hierarchical graph attention network for stock movement prediction[J/OL]. arXiv:, 2019.
77 MAMAT N, OTHMAN M F, ABDOULGHAFOR R, et al. Advancedtechnology in agriculture industry by implementing image annotation technique and deep learning approach: A review[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): ID 1033.
78 ADI M, SINGH A K, REDDY A H, et al. An overview on plant disease detection algorithm using deep learning[C]// 2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2021: 305-309.
79 MAHESWARI P, RAJA P, APOLO-APOLO O E, et al. Intelligent fruit yield estimation for orchards using deep learning based semantic segmentation techniques-a review[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, 12: ID 684328.
80 QIN Q, HU X J. The application of attention mechanism in semantic image segmentation[C]// 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2020: 1573-1580.
81 JIANG B D, AN X Y, XU S F, et al. Intelligentimage semantic segmentation: A review through deep learning techniques for remote sensing image analysis[J]. Journal of the Indian society of remote sensing, 2022: 1-14.
82 PUNITHAVATHI R, DELPHIN CAROLINA RANI A, SUGHASHINI K R, et al. Computer vision and deep learning-enabled weed detection model for precision agriculture[J]. Computer systems science and engineering, 2023, 44(3): 2759-2774.
83 KHATTAK A, ASGHAR M U, BATOOL U, et al. Automatic detection of Citrus fruit and leaves diseases using deep neural network model[J]. IEEE access, 2021, 9: 112942-112954.
84 SINGH S, GUPTA I, GUPTA S, et al. Deep learning based automated detection of diseases from apple leaf images[J]. CMC-Computers, Materials & Continua, 2022, 71(1): 1849-1866.
85 MIRZAZADEH A, AZIZI A, ABBASPOUR-GILANDEH Y, et al. A novel technique for classifying bird damage to rapeseed plants based on a deep learning algorithm[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(11): ID 2364.
86 YANG W, YANG C, HAO Z Y, et al. Diagnosis of plant cold damage based on hyperspectral imaging and convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 118239-118248.
87 JIAO L, XIE C J, CHEN P, et al. Adaptive feature fusion pyramid network for multi-classes agricultural pest detection[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 195: ID 106827.
88 BI C G, HU N, ZOU Y Q, et al. Development of deep learning methodology for maize seed variety recognition based on improved swin transformer[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(8): ID 1843.
89 LYU M J, ZHOU G X, HE M F, et al. Maize leaf disease identification based on feature enhancement and DMS-robust alexnet[J]. IEEE access, 2020, 8: 57952-57966.
90 SAHU S, J A. Maize Plant Disease classification using optimized DenseNet121[C]// 2022 OITS International Conference on Information Technology (OCIT). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 1-6.
91 GEHLOT M, SAINI M L. Analysis of different CNN architectures for tomato leaf disease classification[C]// 2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2021: 1-6.
92 HAMIDISEPEHR A, MIRNEZAMI S V, WARD J K. Comparison of object detection methods for corn damage assessment using deep learning[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2020, 63(6): 1969-1980.
93 SHARMA P, BERWAL Y P S, GHAI W. Performance analysis of deep learning CNN models for disease detection in plants using image segmentation[J]. Information processing in agriculture, 2020, 7(4): 566-574.
94 万军杰, 祁力钧, 卢中奥, 等. 基于迁移学习的GoogLeNet果园病虫害识别与分级[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(11): 209-221.
  WAN J J, QI L J, LU Z A, et al. Recognition and grading of diseases and pests in orchard by GoogLeNet based on Transfer Learning[J]. Journal of China agricultural university, 2021, 26(11): 209-221.
95 CHEN J D, CHEN J X, ZHANG D F, et al. Using deep transfer learning for image-based plant disease identification[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020, 173: ID 105393.
96 周维, 牛永真, 王亚炜, 等. 基于改进的YOLOv4-GhostNet水稻病虫害识别方法[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(3): 685-695.
  ZHOU W, NIU Y Z, WANG Y W, et al. Rice pests and diseases identification method based on improved YOLOv4-GhostNet[J]. Jiangsu journal of agricultural sciences, 2022, 38(3): 685-695.
97 REDDY B S, NEERAJA S. Plant leaf disease classification and damage detection system using deep learning models[J]. Multimedia tools and applications, 2022, 81(17): 24021-24040.
98 YUMANG A N, CHLOE M STA JUANA M, DILOY R L C. Detection and classification of defective fresh excelsa beans using mask R-CNN algorithm[C]// 2022 14th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 97-102.
99 KUMAR D, KUKREJA V. Image-based wheat mosaic virus detection with mask-RCNN model[C]// 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 178-182.
100 DAS M, BAIS A. DeepVeg: Deep learning model for segmentation of weed, canola, and canola flea beetle damage[J]. IEEE access, 2021, 9: 119367-119380.
101 LOYANI L K, BRADSHAW K, MACHUVE D. Segmentation of Tuta absoluta's damage on tomato plants: A computer vision approach[J]. Applied artificial intelligence, 2021, 35(14): 1107-1127.
102 ZHANG J Z, CONG S J, ZHANG G, et al. Detecting pest-infested forest damage through multispectral satellite imagery and improved UNet+[J]. Sensors (basel, Switzerland), 2022, 22(19): ID 7440.
103 NASIRI A, OMID M, TAHERI-GARAVAND A, et al. Deep learning-based precision agriculture through weed recognition in sugar beet fields[J]. Sustainable computing: Informatics and systems, 2022, 35: ID 100759.
104 MEMON M S, KUMAR P, IQBAL R. Metadeep learn leaf disease identification model for cotton crop[J]. Computers, 2022, 11(7): 102.
105 LECUN Y, BOTTOU L, BENGIO Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11): 2278-2324.
106 KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2017, 60(6): 84-90.
107 马岽奡, 唐娉, 赵理君, 等. 深度学习图像数据增广方法研究综述[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2021, 26(3): 487-502.
  MA D A, TANG P, ZHAO L J, et al. Review of data augmentation for image in deep learning[J]. Journal of image and graphics, 2021, 26(3): 487-502.
108 ZHUANG F Z, QI Z Y, DUAN K Y, et al. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2021, 109(1): 43-76.
109 ZHANG L, NIE Q, JI H Y, et al. Hyperspectral imaging combined with generative adversarial network (GAN)-based data augmentation to identify haploid maize kernels[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis, 2022, 106: ID 104346.
Outlines

/