Research Progress and Technology Trend of Intelligent Morning of Dairy Cow Motion Behavior

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.SA202203011

Abstract

Abstract:

The motion behavior of dairy cows contains much of health information. The application of information and intelligent technology will help farms grasp the health status of dairy cows in time and improve breeding efficiency. In this paper, the development trend of intelligent morning technology of cow's motion behavior was mainly analyzed. Firstly, on the basis of expounding the significance of monitoring the basic motion (lying, walking, standing), oestrus, breathing, rumination and limping of dairy cows, the necessity of behavior monitoring of dairy cows was introduced. Secondly, the current research status was summarized from contact monitoring methods and non-contact monitoring methods in chronological order. The principle and achievements of related research were introduced in detail and classified. It is found that the current contact monitoring methods mainly rely on acceleration sensors, pedometers and pressure sensors, while the non-contact monitoring methods mainly rely on video images, including traditional video image analysis and video image analysis based on deep learning. Then, the development status of cow behavior monitoring industry was analyzed, and the main businesses and mainstream products of representative livestock farm automation equipment suppliers were listed. Industry giants, such as Afimilk and DeLaval, as well as their products such as intelligent collar (AfiCollar), pedometer (AfiActll Tag) and automatic milking equipment (VMS™ V300) were introduced. After that, the problems and challenges of current contact and non-contact monitoring methods of dairy cow motion behavior were put forward. The current intelligent monitoring methods of dairy cows' motion behavior are mainly wearable devices, but they have some disadvantages, such as bring stress to dairy cows and are difficult to install and maintain. Although the non-contact monitoring methods based on video image analysis technology does not bring stress to dairy cows and is low cost, the relevant research is still in its infancy, and there is still a certain distance from commercial use. Finally, the future development directions of relevant key technologies were prospected, including miniaturization and integration of wearable monitoring equipment, improving the robustness of computer vision technology, multi-target monitoring with limited equipment and promoting technology industrialization.

Key words: dairy cows, motion behavior, health condition, intelligent monitoring, smart animal husbandry

CLC Number:

WANG Zheng, SONG Huaibo, WANG Yunfei, HUA Zhixin, LI Rong, XU Xingshi. Research Progress and Technology Trend of Intelligent Morning of Dairy Cow Motion Behavior[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(2): 36-52.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Researches on contact behavior monitoring of dairy cows

传感器类型	特征类型	分类算法	监测行为类型	准确率	来源	年份
加速度	颈部运动数据	K-Means	静止、慢走、快跑、爬跨	——	尹令等^［12］	2010
加速度，位置	蹄部运动数据，位置坐标	多分类 BP-AdaBoost	采食、躺卧、静止站立、躺下、起身、正常行走、主动行走	多数80%以上	Wang等^［13］	2018
加速度	颈部运动数据	SVM^①	站立、躺卧、采食、行走	90.24%	Hoang等^［14］	2018
加速度	侧腹运动数据	随机森林	采食、移动（行走或轻微移动）、反刍、休息	75.90%	Balasso等^［15］	2021
加速度，位置	颈部运动数据，位置坐标	BP神经网络	发情	95.46%	Wang等^［16］	2022
加速度	下颌运动数据	KNN^②	采食和反刍	采食：92.80% 反刍：93.70%	Shen等^［17］	2019
加速度	颈部运动数据	——	放牧和反刍	——	Iqbal等^［18］	2021
惯性测量单元	蹄部运动数据	SVM	跛行	91.10%	Haladjian等^［19］	2017
计步器	活动量	——	妊娠后期活动量	——	蒋晓新等^［20］	2014
计步器	活动量	——	蹄病	——	蒋晓新等^［21］	2014
计步器	活动量	SVM	发情	98.90%	谭益等^［22］	2018
计步器	活动量	KNN	跛行	87.00%	Taneja等^［23］	2020
压力	呼吸时腹部规律性起伏	——	呼吸	——	Eigenberg等^［24］	2000
压力	呼吸时鼻腔与周围环境的压力差	——	呼吸	与人工计数具有较高相关性	Strutzke等^［25］	2018
压力	咀嚼时产生规律的压力变化	——	反刍	与人工计数具有较高相关性	Braun等^［26］	2013
压力	咀嚼时产生规律的压力变化	——	采食和反刍	与称重槽测定结果具有较高相关性	Pahl等^［27］	2016
压力	足底压力分布情况	——	跛行	——	杨丽娟等^［28］	2016
电阻	阴道电阻值	——	发情	精度为± 2.00%	刘忠超和何东健^［29］	2019
振动，姿态，温度	活动量，静卧时间，体温	学习矢量量化神经网络	发情	预测准确率70.00%以上	田富洋等^［30］	2013
声音	声音识别出下颌运动	基于多层感知机的自下而上觅食活动识别器算法	采食和反刍	F₁分值均高于0.75	Chelotti等^［31］	2020
温度	奶牛鼻孔附近环境温度	——	呼吸	与人工计数无统计学差异	Milan等^［32］	2016

Table 1

Table 2

Researches on non-contact behavior monitoring of dairy cows

方法	特征类型	分类算法	行为类型	准确率	文献	年份
传统视频图像分析	呼吸时腹部规律起伏	光流法	呼吸	95.68%	赵凯旋等^［33］	2014
	爬跨过程包围两头牛的边界框长度	——	爬跨	0.33%（假阳性率）	Tsai和Huang^［34］	2014
	蹄肢运动曲线	K-Means	跛行	91.15%	Zhao和He^［35］	2014
	牛的质心和轮廓	基于结构相似度的聚类算法	躺卧、站立、行走、奔跑	97. 32%	何东健等^［36］	2016
	爬跨时两头奶牛最小包围盒之间的相交面积	——	爬跨	80.00%	顾静秋等^［37］	2017
	反刍时嘴部区域质心轨迹	均值漂移	反刍	92.03%	Chen等^［38］	2017
	步态特征	基于共轭梯度追踪算法的稀疏超完备词典学习方法	跛行	92.70%	温长吉等^［39］	2018
	反刍时嘴部区域质心轨迹	核相关滤波	反刍	误检率7.72%（双目标）	宋怀波等^［40］	2018
	头颈部轮廓拟合直线斜率	KNN	跛行	93.89%	宋怀波等^［41］	2018
	爬跨时几何和光流特征	SVM	爬跨	90.90%	Guo等^［42］	2019
	呼吸时腹部规律起伏	Lucas-Kanade稀疏光流法	呼吸	98.58%	宋怀波等^［43］	2019
	牛蹄跟随性	阈值判别	跛行	93.30%	康熙等^［44］	2019
	爬跨过程包围两头牛的最小外接矩形	KNN	爬跨	99.21%	谢忠红等^［45］	2021
基于深度学习的视频图像分析	——	CNN^①	爬跨	98.25%	刘忠超和何东健^［46］	2019
	呼吸时腹部规律起伏	融合Deeplab V3+和Lucas-Kanade稀疏光流法	呼吸	93.04%	Wu等^［47］	2020
	——	融合卷积神经网络和长短期记忆网络	躺卧、站立、行走、饮水、反刍	97.60%	Wu等^［48］	2021
	——	改进YOLOv3	爬跨	99.15%	王少华和何东健^［49］	2021
	——	Rexnet 3D	躺卧、站立、行走	95.00%	Ma等^［50］	2022
	——	3D卷积网络和卷积长短期记忆网络	采食、寻觅、舔舐、行走、站立	90.32%（牛犊）86.67%（成年奶牛）	Qiao等^［51］	2022
	背部曲率	噪声+双向长短期记忆网络	跛行	96.61%	Jiang等^［52］	2022
激光	呼吸时腹部规律起伏	——	呼吸	——	Pastell等^［53］	2007
声学	哞叫声	支持向量数据描述	发情	94.00%	Chung等^［54］	2013
热成像	呼吸时由呼吸气流引起的鼻部区域像素强度值变化	——	呼吸	较人工计数结果相关系数为0.87	Jorquera-Chavez等^［55］	2019

Table 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 3

Part of international livestock farm automation equipment suppliers and products

公司名称	国家	主营业务	部分产品	主要功能	网址
阿菲金（Afimilk）	以色列	智能穿戴，数字奶厅，智能分群，管理软件	项圈计步器AfiCollar	活动量统计，牛号识别，反刍时间，采食时间	http：//www.afimilk.com.cn/
阿菲金（Afimilk）	以色列	智能穿戴，数字奶厅，智能分群，管理软件	脚环计步器AfiActll Tag	活动量统计，牛号识别，躺卧数据统计，舒适度监控，产犊预警	http：//www.afimilk.com.cn/
安乐福（Allflex）	美国	动物识别，智能监控，奶厅整机，智能数据	eSense™Flex耳标	繁育监测，营养监测，健康监测，群组监控，牧场管理	https：//www.allflex.global/cn/our-legacy/
安乐福（Allflex）	美国	动物识别，智能监控，奶厅整机，智能数据	cSense™ Flex项圈	繁育监测，营养监测，健康监测，群组监控，牧场管理	https：//www.allflex.global/cn/our-legacy/
利拉伐（DeLaval）	瑞典	挤奶解决方案，牧场管理系统，奶牛舒适产品，奶牛饲喂产品	自愿挤奶系统 VMS™ V300	自动挤奶，收集挤奶信息	https：//www.delaval.com/zh-cn/
利拉伐（DeLaval）	瑞典	挤奶解决方案，牧场管理系统，奶牛舒适产品，奶牛饲喂产品	自动搅拌推料机器人 OptiDuo™	饲料混合搅拌，移动推料	https：//www.delaval.com/zh-cn/
莱力（Lely）	荷兰	挤奶方案，饲喂方案，牛舍管理，健康管理，大型牧场管理，数据管理分析	Lely Calm犊牛饲喂器	自动喂料，自动调节饲料配量，自动清洁，远程监控	https：//www.lely.com/
莱力（Lely）	荷兰	挤奶方案，饲喂方案，牛舍管理，健康管理，大型牧场管理，数据管理分析	Lely Juno 自动推料机	预定轨迹移动，自动送料	https：//www.lely.com/
COWLAR	美国	可穿戴奶牛监测设备	智能项圈	健康监测，发情周期预测	https：//www.cowlar.com/
Connecterra	荷兰	奶牛健康监测	Ida智能项圈	牛群概况，行为分析，健康统计，生育信息	https：//www.connecterra.io/
博美特（BouMatic）	美国	精准健康管理，智能化挤奶方案，牛奶冷却系统，牧场卫生清洁系统等	GEMINI MILKING ROBOTS挤奶机器人	并排挤奶，自动挤奶	https：//boumatic.com/eu_en/
博美特（BouMatic）	美国	精准健康管理，智能化挤奶方案，牛奶冷却系统，牧场卫生清洁系统等	OPTIFLO™ CF 电子奶泵速度控制器	牛奶冷却输送	https：//boumatic.com/eu_en/
Farmnote	日本	可穿戴奶牛监测设备	Farmnote Color项圈	健康监测，异常预警，智能终端可视化管理	https：//farmnote.jp/en/
加拉格尔（Gallagher）	新西兰	电子围栏，智能称重，牧场管理软件	eShepherd颈带	GPS定位，终端设定虚拟围栏，牛只越界自动警示	https：//www.gallagher.com/
基伊埃（GEA）	德国	挤奶方案，牛奶冷却与存储，卫生清洁方案，饲喂系统，牛群管理系统	CowScout 项圈/脚环	精准定位，发情监测，活动量监测采食及反刍时间监测	https：//www.gea.com/zh/dairy-farming/index.jsp

Table 3

References 85

1	中国奶业协会. 中国奶业改革开放30年[J]. 中国奶牛, 2009(1): 5-10.
2	焦宏, 雷少斐. 2022年我国奶业成本与供需形势预测——保证生产者利益是中国奶业稳定的基石 [EB/OL]. (2021-12-30) [2022-02-15].
3	刘亚清, 王加启. 2021中国奶业质量报告[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2021.
4	李彦军, 赵晓静, 翟文栋, 等. 看奶牛异常行为诊断牛病[J]. 中国奶牛, 2011(9): 38-40.
	LI Y, ZHAO X, ZHAI W, et al. Diagnosis of bovine disease by observing the abnormal behavior of dairy cows[J]. China Dairy Cattle, 2011(9): 38-40.
5	王晓鹏, 斯琴巴特, 吐日跟白乙拉. 奶牛躺卧行为的研究进展[J]. 当代畜禽养殖业, 2017(5): 3-5.
6	LUCY M C. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end?[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84(6): 1277-1293.
7	POLSKY L, KEYSERLINGK M V. Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017, 100(11): 8645-8657.
8	邵大富. 奶牛反刍行为变化规律及其影响因素的相关性研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015.
	SHAO D. Researches on variation of the rumination and its influencing factors in lactating cows[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015.
9	李小杉, 杨丰利. 奶牛肢蹄病对繁殖性能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2014, 41(5): 248-251.
	LI X, YANG F. Effect of lameness on reproductive performance in dairy cows[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2014, 41(5): 248-251.
10	何东健, 刘冬, 赵凯旋. 精准畜牧业中动物信息智能感知与行为检测研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(5): 231-244.
	HE D, LIU D, ZHAO K. Review of perceiving animal information and behavior in precision livestock farming[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2016, 47(5): 231-244.
11	滕光辉. 畜禽设施精细养殖中信息感知与环境调控综述[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2019, 1(3): 1-12.
	TENG G. Information sensing and environment control of precision facility livestock and poultry farming[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2019, 1(3): 1-12.
12	尹令, 刘财兴, 洪添胜, 等. 基于无线传感器网络的奶牛行为特征监测系统设计[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(3): 203-208, 388.
	YIN L, LIU C, HONG T, et al. Design of system for monitoring dairy cattle's behavioral features based on wireless sensor networks[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(3): 203-208, 388.
13	WANG J, HE Z, ZHENG G, et al. Development and validation of an ensemble classifier for real-time recognition of cow behavior patterns from accelerometer data and location data[J]. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(9): ID e0203546.
14	HOANG Q T, PHUNG C P K, BUI T N, et al. Cow behavior monitoring using a multidimensional acceleration sensor and multiclass SVM[J]. International Journal of Machine Learning and Networked Collaborative Engineering, 2018, 2(3): 110-118.
15	BALASSO P, MARCHESINI G, UGHELINI N, et al. Machine learning to detect posture and behavior in dairy cows: Information from an accelerometer on the animal's left flank[J]. Animals, 2021, 11(10): ID 2972.
16	WANG J, ZHANG Y, WANG J, et al. Using machine-learning technique for estrus onset detection in dairy cows from acceleration and location data acquired by a neck-tag[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2022, 214: 193-206.
17	SHEN W, CHENG F, ZHANG Y, et al. Automatic recognition of ingestive-related behaviors of dairy cows based on triaxial acceleration[J]. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2019, 7(3): 427-443.
18	IQBAL M W, DRAGANOVA I, MOREL P C, et al. Validation of an accelerometer sensor-based collar for monitoring grazing and rumination behaviours in grazing dairy cows[J]. Animals, 2021, 11(9): ID 2724.
19	HALADJIAN J, HODAIE Z, NÜSKE S, et al. Gait anomaly detection in dairy cattle[C]// ACI 2017: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017: 1-8.
20	蒋晓新, 邓双义, 刘炜, 等. 运用计步器对北方地区荷斯坦奶牛妊娠后期活动量进行控制的研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2014(17): 102-104.
	JIANG X, DENG S, LIU W, et al. Study on controlling the activity of Holstein cows in the late pregnancy in northern China by pedometer[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2014(17): 102-104.
21	蒋晓新, 魏星远, 邓双义, 等. 计步器监测荷斯坦奶牛蹄病的效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(2): 178-180.
	JIANG X, WEI X, DENG S, et al. Effect of pedometer monitoring hoof disease in Holstein cows[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(2): 178-180.
22	谭益, 何东健, 郭阳阳, 等. 基于Storm的奶牛发情实时监测系统设计与实现[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(12): 83-90.
	TAN Y, HE D, GUO Y, et al. Design and implementation of real-time monitoring system for cow estrus based on storm[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(12): 83-90.
23	TANEJA M, BYABAZAIRE J, JALODIA N, et al. Machine learning based fog computing assisted data-driven approach for early lameness detection in dairy cattle[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020, 171: ID 105286.
24	EIGENBERG R, HAHN G, NIENABER J, et al. Development of a new respiration rate monitor for cattle[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 2000, 43(3): 723-728.
25	STRUTZKE S, FISKE D, HOFFMANN G, et al. Development of a noninvasive respiration rate sensor for cattle[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 102(1): 690-695.
26	BRAUN U, TRÖSCH L, NYDEGGER F, et al. Evaluation of eating and rumination behaviour in cows using a noseband pressure sensor[J]. BMC Veterinary Research, 2013, 9(1): 1-8.
27	PAHL C, HARTUNG E, GROTHMANN A, et al. Suitability of feeding and chewing time for estimation of feed intake in dairy cows[J]. Animal, 2016, 10(9): 1507-1512.
28	杨丽娟, 张永, 刘德环, 等. 基于压力分布测量系统的奶牛跛行早期识别[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(S1): 426-432.
	YANG L, ZHANG Y, LIU D, et al. Early recognition for dairy cow lameness based on pressure distribution measurement system[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2016, 47(S1): 426-432.
29	刘忠超, 何东健. 奶牛阴道植入式电阻传感器与无线监测系统研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(11): 175-185.
	LIU Z, HE D. Research of implantable sensor and wireless monitoring system for cow's vaginal resistance[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019, 50(11): 175-185.
30	田富洋, 王冉冉, 刘莫尘, 等. 基于神经网络的奶牛发情行为辨识与预测研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2013, 44(S1): 277-281.
	TIAN F, WANG R, LIU M, et al. Oestrus detection and prediction in dairy cows based on neural networks[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2013, 44(S1): 277-281.
31	CHELOTTI J O, VANRELL S R, RAU L, et al. An online method for estimating grazing and rumination bouts using acoustic signals in grazing cattle[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020, 173: ID 105443.
32	MILAN H, MAIA A, GEBREMEDHIN K G. Technical note: Device for measuring respiration rate of cattle under field conditions[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2016, 94(12): 5434-5438.
33	赵凯旋, 何东健, 王恩泽. 基于视频分析的奶牛呼吸频率与异常检测[J]. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(10): 258-263.
	ZHAO K, HE D, WANG E. Detection of breathing rate and abnormity of dairy cattle based on video analysis[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2014, 45(10): 258-263.
34	TSAI D M, HUANG C Y. A motion and image analysis method for automatic detection of estrus and mating behavior in cattle[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2014, 104: 25-31.
35	ZHAO K, HE D. Real-time automatic classification of lameness in dairy cattle based on movement analysis with image processing technique[C]// 2014 ASABE and CSBE/SCGAB Annual International Meeting. Montreal, Quebec Canada: ASABE, 2014.
36	何东健, 孟凡昌, 赵凯旋, 等. 基于视频分析的犊牛基本行为识别[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(9): 294-300.
	HE D, MENG F, ZHAO K, et al. Recognition of calf basic behaviors based on video analysis[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2016, 47(9): 294-300.
37	顾静秋, 王志海, 高荣华, 等. 基于融合图像与运动量的奶牛行为识别方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(6): 145-151.
	GU J, WANG Z, GAO R, et al. Recognition method of cow behavior based on combination of image and activities[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2017, 48(6): 145-151.
38	CHEN Y, HE D, FU Y, et al. Intelligent monitoring method of cow ruminant behavior based on video analysis technology[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2017, 10(5): 194-202.
39	温长吉, 张金凤, 李卓识, 等. 改进稀疏超完备词典方法识别奶牛跛足行为[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(18): 219-227.
	WEN C, ZHANG J, LI Z, et al. Behavior recognition of lameness in dairy cattle by improved sparse overcomplete dictionary method[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(18): 219-227.
40	宋怀波, 牛满堂, 姬存慧, 等. 基于视频分析的多目标奶牛反刍行为监测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(18): 211-218.
	SONG H, NIU M, JI C, et al. Monitoring of multi-target cow ruminant behavior based on video analysis technology[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(18): 211-218.
41	宋怀波, 姜波, 吴倩, 等. 基于头颈部轮廓拟合直线斜率特征的奶牛跛行检测方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(15): 190-199.
	SONG H, JIANG B, WU Q, et al. Detection of dairy cow lameness based on fitting line slope feature of head and neck outline[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(15): 190-199.
42	GUO Y, ZHANG Z, HE D, et al. Detection of cow mounting behavior using region geometry and optical flow characteristics[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 163: ID 104828.
43	宋怀波, 吴頔华, 阴旭强, 等. 基于Lucas-Kanade稀疏光流算法的奶牛呼吸行为检测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(17): 215-224.
	SONG H, WU D, YIN X, et al. Respiratory behavior detection of cow based on Lucas-Kanade sparse optical flow algorithm[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019, 35(17): 215-224.
44	康熙, 张旭东, 刘刚, 等. 基于机器视觉的跛行奶牛牛蹄定位方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(S1): 276-282.
	KANG X, ZHANG X, LIU G, et al. Hoof location method of lame dairy cows based on machine vision[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019, 50(S1): 276-282.
45	谢忠红, 刘悦怡, 宋子阳, 等. 基于时序运动特征的奶牛爬跨行为识别研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2021, 44(01): 194-200.
	XIE Z, LIU Y, SONG Z, et al. Research on recognition of crawling behavior of cows based on temporal motion features[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2021, 44(01): 194-200.
46	刘忠超, 何东健. 基于卷积神经网络的奶牛发情行为识别方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(7): 186-193.
	LIU Z, HE D. Recognition method of cow estrus behavior based on convolutional neural network[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019, 50(7): 186-193.
47	WU D, YIN X, JIANG B, et al. Detection of the respiratory rate of standing cows by combining the Deeplab V3+ semantic segmentation model with the phase-based video magnification algorithm[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2020, 192: 72-89.
48	WU D, WANG Y, HAN M, et al. Using a CNN-LSTM for basic behaviors detection of a single dairy cow in a complex environment[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021, 182: ID 106016.
49	王少华, 何东健. 基于改进YOLOv3模型的奶牛发情行为识别研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(7): 141-150.
	WANG S, HE D. Estrus behavior recognition of dairy cows based on improved YOLOv3 model[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2021, 52(7): 141-150.
50	MA S, ZHANG Q, LI T, et al. Basic motion behavior recognition of single dairy cow based on improved Rexnet 3D network[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 194: ID 106772.
51	QIAO Y, GUO Y, YU K, et al. C3D-ConvLSTM based cow behaviour classification using video data for precision livestock farming[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 193: ID 106650.
52	JIANG B, SONG H, WANG H, et al. Dairy cow lameness detection using a back curvature feature[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 194: ID 106729.
53	PASTELL M, KAIHILAHTI J, AISLA A M, et al. A system for contact-free measurement of respiration rate of dairy cows[C]// 3rd European conference on Precision Livestock Farming (ECPLF). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007: 105-109.
54	CHUNG Y, LEE J, OH S, et al. Automatic detection of cow's oestrus in audio surveillance system[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2013, 26(7): 1030-1037.
55	JORQUERA-CHAVEZ M, FUENTES S, DUNSHEA F R, et al. Modelling and validation of computer vision techniques to assess heart rate, eye temperature, ear-base temperature and respiration rate in cattle[J]. Animals, 2019, 9(12): ID 1089.
56	曹斌斌, 郭栋, 刘李萍, 等. 奶牛躺卧行为简要分析[J]. 中国奶牛, 2020(9): 10-12.
	CAO B, GUO D, LIU L, et al. Brief analysis of lying down behavior of dairy cows[J]. China Dairy Cattle, 2020(9): 10-12.
57	阴旭强. 基于深度学习的奶牛基本运动行为识别方法研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.
	YIN X. Basic motion behavior recognition of dairy cows based on deep learning[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021.
58	潘予琮, 王慧, 熊本海, 等. 发情监测系统在奶牛养殖数字化管理中的应用[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(6): 2500-2506.
	PAN Y, WANG H, XIONG B, et al. Application of estrus monitoring system in digital management of dairy cows[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32(6): 2500-2506.
59	刘忠超, 翟天嵩, 何东健. 精准养殖中奶牛个体信息监测研究现状及进展[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2019(13): 30-33, 38.
	LIU Z, ZHAI T, HE D. Research status and progress of individual information monitoring of dairy cows in precision breeding[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine. 2019(13): 30-33, 38.
60	沈明霞, 刘龙申, 闫丽, 等. 畜禽养殖个体信息监测技术研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(10): 245-251.
	SHEN M, LIU L, YAN L, et al. Review of monitoring technology for animal individual in animal husbandry[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2014, 45(10): 245-251.
61	王少华. 基于视频分析和深度学习的奶牛爬跨行为检测方法研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.
	WANG S. Detection methods of cow mounting behavior based on video analysis and deep learning[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021.
62	GODYŃ D, HERBUT P, ANGRECKA S. Measurements of peripheral and deep body temperature in cattle—A review[J]. Journal of Thermal Biology, 2019, 79: 42-49.
63	YEON S C, JEON J H, HOUPT K A, et al. Acoustic features of vocalizations of Korean native cows (Bos taurus coreanea) in two different conditions[J]. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2006, 101(1-2): 1-9.
64	MWAANGA E S, JANOWSKI T. Anoestrus in dairy cows: Causes, prevalence and clinical forms[J]. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2000, 35(5): 193-200.
65	崔永国. 奶牛正常生理指标与检查方法[J]. 养殖技术顾问, 2013(5): 18.
66	RAMENDRA D, LALRENGPUII S, NISHANT V, et al. Impact of heat stress on health and performance of dairy animals: A review[J]. Veterinary World, 2016, 9(3): 260-268.
67	DE RENSIS F, GARCIA-ISPIERTO I, LÓPEZ-GATIUS F. Seasonal heat stress: Clinical implications and hormone treatments for the fertility of dairy cows[J]. Theriogenology, 2015, 84(5): 659-666.
68	吴頔华. 基于视频分析的奶牛呼吸行为检测方法研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.
	WU D. Detection of dairy cow's respiratory behavior based on video analysis[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021.
69	何孟宁. 奶牛数字化管理的关键技术研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2015.
	HE M. The key technology of digital cow management[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2015.
70	BERTONI G, TREVISI E, HAN X, et al. Effects of inflammatory conditions on liver activity in puerperium period and consequences for performance in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91(9): 3300-3310.
71	鄢新义, 董刚辉, 徐伟, 等. 北京地区奶牛反刍与活动量影响因素分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016, 47(5): 955-961.
	YAN X, DONG G, XU W, et al. Analysis of influence factors on cow's rumination and activity in Beijing[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2016, 47(5): 955-961.
72	王奎, 武佩, 宣传忠, 等. 放牧家畜牧食信息监测的研究进展[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2020, 43(3): 403-413.
	WANG K, WU P, XUAN C, et al. Progress in monitoring the grazing information of livestock[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020, 43(3): 403-413.
73	宋怀波, 李通, 姜波, 等. 基于Horn-Schunck光流法的多目标反刍奶牛嘴部自动监测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(10): 163-171.
	SONG H, LI T, JIANG B, et al. Automatic detection of multi-target ruminate cow mouths based on Horn-Schunck optical flow algorithm[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(10): 163-171.
74	BEZEN R, EDAN Y, HALACHMI I. Computer vision system for measuring individual cow feed intake using RGB-D camera and deep learning algorithms[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020, 172: ID 105345.
75	HUXLEY J N. Impact of lameness and claw lesions in cows on health and production[J]. Livestock Science, 2013, 156(1-3): 64-70.
76	韩书庆, 张晶, 程国栋, 等. 奶牛跛行自动识别技术研究现状与挑战[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2020, 2(3): 21-36.
	HAN S, ZHANG J, CHENG G, et al. Current state and challenges of automatic lameness detection in dairy cattle[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(3): 21-36.
77	严作廷, 王东升, 张世栋, 等. 奶牛肢蹄病综合防治技术[J]. 兽医导刊, 2013(1): 35-37.
	YAN Z, WANG D, ZHANG S, et al. Integrated prevention and treatment technology of cow limb and foot disease[J]. Veterinary Orientation, 2013(1): 35-37.
78	阿菲金市场部. 智能脚环丨一篇文章带您读懂计步器的佩戴和维护[EB/OL]. (2022-03-31) [2022-04-15].
79	ALSAAOD M, SCHAEFER A L, BÜSCHER W, et al. The role of infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool for the detection of lameness in cattle[J]. Sensors, 2015, 15(6): 14513-14525.
80	WOOD S, LIN Y, KNOWLES T, et al. Infrared thermometry for lesion monitoring in cattle lameness[J]. Veterinary Record, 2015, 176(12): ID 308.
81	阿菲金市场部. 智能穿戴｜阿菲金智能脚环计步器[EB/OL]. (2022-04-07) [2022.05.20].
82	何鹏. 农业黑科技, 让你更懂牲畜的心情[EB/OL]. (2018-06-04) [2022-05-20].
83	王雪涵, 陆少游. 放牛娃时代已然过去,让AI帮你养奶牛\|智周报告核心版[EB/OL]. (2019-11-18) [2022.05.20].
84	AQUILANI C, CONFESSORE A, BOZZI R, et al. Review: Precision livestock farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems[J]. Animal, 2022, 16(1): ID 100429.
85	TVAN HERTEM, VIAZZI S, STEENSELS M, et al. Automatic lameness detection based on consecutive 3D-video recordings[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2014, 119: 108-116.

[1]	GUO Yangyang, DU Shuzeng, QIAO Yongliang, LIANG Dong. Advances in the Applications of Deep Learning Technology for Livestock Smart Farming [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023, 5(1): 52-65.
[2]	BAI Geng, GE Yufeng. Crop Stress Sensing and Plant Phenotyping Systems: A Review [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023, 5(1): 66-81.
[3]	LI Li, LI Minzan, LIU Gang, ZHANG Man, WANG Maohua. Goals, Key Technologies, and Regional Models of Smart Farming for Field Crops in China [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(4): 26-34.
[4]	ZHAO Ruixue, YANG Chenxue, ZHENG Jianhua, LI Jiao, WANG Jian. Agricultural Intelligent Knowledge Service: Overview and Future Perspectives [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(4): 105-125.
[5]	JI Nan, YIN Yanling, SHEN Weizheng, KOU Shengli, DAI Baisheng, WANG Guowei. Pig Sound Analysis: A Measure of Welfare [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(2): 19-35.
[6]	HUANG Zichen, SUGIYAMA Saki. Research Progress and Enlightenment of Japanese Harvesting Robot in Facility Agriculture [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(2): 135-149.
[7]	KANG Xi, LIU Gang, CHU Mengyuan, LI Qian, WANG Yanchao. Advances and Challenges in Physiological Parameters Monitoring and Diseases Diagnosing of Dairy Cows Based on Computer Vision [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(2): 1-18.
[8]	ZHU Rongsheng, LI Shuai, SUN Yongzhe, CAO Yangyang, SUN Kai, GUO Yixin, JIANG Bofeng, WANG Xueying, LI Yang, ZHANG Zhanguo, XIN Dawei, HU Zhenbang, CHEN Qingshan. Research Advances and Prospects of Crop 3D Reconstruction Technology [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(3): 94-115.
[9]	CHEN Xuegeng, WEN Haojun, ZHANG Weirong, PAN Fochu, ZHAO Yan. Advances and Progress of Agricultural Machinery and Sensing Technology Fusion [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(4): 1-16.
[10]	CHEN Dong, Tian'en CHEN, JIANG Shuwen, ZHANG Chi, WANG Cong, LU Mengyao. Optimal Model of Chicken Distribution Vehicle Scheduling Based on Order Clustering [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(4): 137-148.
[11]	LI Daoliang, LIU Chang. Recent Advances and Future Outlook for Artificial Intelligence in Aquaculture [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(3): 1-20.
[12]	HAN Shuqing, ZHANG Jing, CHENG Guodong, PENG Yingqi, ZHANG Jianhua, WU Jianzhai. Current State and Challenges of Automatic Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(3): 21-36.
[13]	YU Weige, WU Huarui, PENG Cheng. Short-Term Price Forecast of Vegetables Based on Combination Model of Lasso Regression Method and BP Neural Network [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(3): 108-117.
[14]	Cao Hongxin, Ge Daokuo, Zhang Wenyu, Zhang Weixin, Cao Jing, Liang Wanjie, Xuan Shouli, Liu Yan, Wu Qian, Sun Chuanliang, Zhang Lingling, Xia Ji‘an, Liu Yongxia, Chen Yuli, Yue Yanbin, Zhang Zhiyou, Wan Qian, Pan Yue, Han Xujie, Wu Fei. Developmental analysis and application examples for agricultural models [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(1): 147-162.
[15]	Yang Chenghai. Airborne remote sensing systems for precision agriculture applications [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(1): 1-22.