The Accuracy Differences of Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images Monitoring Maize Plant Height at Different Growth Stages

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.2021.3.3.202105-SA008

Abstract

Abstract:

The digital elevation model (DEM) of maize population in field was constructed by using optical imaging equipment mounted on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to study the accuracy difference of maize population height monitoring at different growth stages. Three cultivars and eight sowing date treatments were set up to structure maize population with different plant heights. A multi-rotor UAV with high-definition digital camera and multispectral imaging sensor was used to take RGB images and multispectral images in the experiment area on July 25th and August 27th, 2018, which were the biggest and smallest differences in plant height. The DEM data of maize population and canopy height were obtained with image pose correction, image mosaic, point cloud generation, and space reconstruction, et al. The canopy height and plant height were normalized, and the correlation between different cultivars and sowing date was analyzed based on UAV and manual plant height measurement. The feasibility of using DEM data of maize canopy to monitor the difference of plant height was clarified. The results showed that the height difference of maize population could be reflected by the digital elevation information obtained from high-definition RGB camera and multispectral camera. The plant height monitoring accuracy of HD RGB camera was higher than that of multispectral camera. However, the monitoring accuracy of plant height was not enough under the ready-made image equipment and treatment method. So, it was difficult to reflect the smaller plant height difference of maize population. Growth stage had a great influence on the monitoring of maize plant height. When the canopy of early growth stage has not completely covered the surface or the leaf yellow and withered in the later stage of growth. The plant height of the population affected by the exposed surface was seriously underestimated. In this study, the effects of UAV imaging equipment on monitoring maize plant height were analyzed. The influence factors can be used as reference for the application of the method in field production.

Key words: accuracy difference, UAV, monitoring plant height, maize, multispectral

CLC Number:

S513

YANG Jin, MING Bo, YANG Fei, XU Honggen, LI Lulu, GAO Shang, LIU Chaowei, WANG Keru, LI Shaokun. The Accuracy Differences of Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images Monitoring Maize Plant Height at Different Growth Stages[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(3): 129-138.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 3

References 25

1	杨邦杰, 裴志远. 农作物长势的定义与遥感监测[J]. 农业工程学报, 1999(3): 214-218.
	YANG B, PEI Z. Definition of crop condition and crop monitoring using remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 1999(3): 214-218.
2	YIN X, MCCLURE MA, JAJA N, et al. In-season prediction of corn yield using plant height under major production systems[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2011, 103(3): 923-929.
3	NORA T, HELGE A, GEORGE B. Fusion of plant height and vegetation indices for the estimation of barley biomass[J]. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(9): 11449-11480.
4	黄瑞冬, 李广权. 玉米株高整齐度及其测定方法的比较[J]. 玉米科学, 1995(2): 61-63.
	HUANG R, LI G. Plant height consistencies in maize population and a comparison of their measuring Techniques[J]. Maize Science, 1995(2): 61-63.
5	何晶. 基于图像处理的株高无损测量方法研究[J]. 测控技术, 2015, 34(4): 39-42.
	HE J. Measurement method of plant height based on image processing[J]. Measurement & Control Technology, 2015, 34(4): 39-42.
6	张宝来, 张乐佳. 基于数字图像处理技术的玉米长势预测[J]. 农业工程, 2017(3): 163-168.
	ZHANG B, ZHANG L. Prediction of corn growth based on digital image processing technology[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 2017(3): 163-168.
7	YU J, LI C, PATERSON A H. High-throughput phenotyping of cotton plant height using depth images under field conditions[J]. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2016, 130: 57-68.
8	JIANG Y, LI C, PATERSON A H. High throughput phenotyping of cotton plant height using depth images under field conditions[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2016, 130: 57-68.
9	宗泽, 郭彩玲, 张雪, 等. 基于深度相机的玉米株型参数提取方法研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015(S1): 50-56.
	ZONG Z, GUO C, ZHANG X, et al. Maize plant type extraction based on depth camera[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015(S1): 50-56.
10	史蒲娟, 翟瑞芳, 常婷婷, 等. 基于单目视觉和激光扫描技术的油菜植株型重建及株型参数测量[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2017, 36(3): 63-68.
	SHI P, ZHAI R, CHANG T, et al. 3D model generation and phenotypic measurement of rapeseed plant based on monocular visio and laser scanning technology[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2017, 36(3): 63-68.
11	郭新年, 周恒瑞, 张国良, 等. 基于激光视觉的农作物株高测量系统[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(2): 22-27.
	GUO X, ZHOU H, ZHANG G, et al. Crop height measurement system based on laser vision[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2018, 49(2): 22-27.
12	PATURKAR A, GSEN GUPTA, BAILEY D. Making use of 3D models for plant physiognomic analysis: A review[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(11): ID 2232.
13	丁国辉, 许昊, 温明星, 等. 基于经济型低空无人机对小麦重要产量表型性状的多生育时期获取和自动化分析[J]. 农业大数据学报, 2019, 1(2): 19-31.
	DING G, XU H, WEN M, et al. Developing cost-effective and low-altitude UAV aerial phenotyping and automated phenotypic analysis to measure key yield-related traits for bread wheat[J]. Journal of Agricultrual Big Data, 2019, 1(2): 19-31.
14	HAN X, THOMASSON J A, BAGNALL G C, et al. Measurement and calibration of plant-height from fixed-wing UAV images[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(12): ID 4092.
15	牛庆林, 冯海宽, 杨贵军, 等. 基于无人机数码影像的玉米育种材料株高和LAI监测[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(5): 73-82.
	NIU Q, FENG H, YANG G, et al. Monitoring plant height and leaf area index of maize breeding material based on UAV digital images[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(5): 73-82.
16	JOSÉ M P, DE CANA I, JORGE T, et al. Estimating tree height and biomass of a poplar plantation with image-based UAV technology[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(3): 313-326.
17	SIMON M, FRED B, BENOITDE S, et al. High-throughput phenotyping of plant height: Comparing unmanned aerial vehicles and ground LiDAR estimates[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017(8): ID 2002.
18	JIMENEZ-BERNI J A, DEERY D M, PABLO R L, et al. High throughput determination of plant height, ground cover, and above-ground biomass in wheat with LiDAR[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018(9): ID 237.
19	LUO S, LIU W, ZHANG Y, et al. Maize and soybean heights estimation from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR data[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021, 182(3): ID 106005.
20	ZHOU L, GU X, CHENG S, et al. Analysis of plant height changes of lodged maize using UAV-LiDAR data[J]. Agriculture, 2020, 10(5): ID 146.
21	ÁNGEL M, MAR A, ELÍAS M, et al. Analysis of vegetation indices to determine nitrogen application and yield prediction in maize (Zea mays L.) from a standard UAV service[J]. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8(12): ID 973.
22	BENDIG J, WILLKOMM M, TILLY N, et al. Very high resolution crop surface models (CSM) from UAV-based stereo images for rice growth monitoring in northeast China[J]. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, 2013(1): 45-50.
23	MATESE A, GENNARO S F D, BERTON A. Assessment of a canopy height model (CHM) in a vineyard using UAV-based multispectral imaging[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 38(8-10): 2150-2160.
24	FORLANI G, ASTA E D, DIOTRI F, et al. Quality assessment of DSMs produced from UAV flights georeferenced with on-board RTK positioning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 311.
25	IQBAL F, LUCIEER A, BARRY K, et al. Poppy crop height and capsule volume estimation from a single UAS flight[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(7): ID 647.

播期	7月25日			8月27日
播期	FK139	JNK728	ZD958	FK139	JNK728	ZD958
B1	AS 41 d	AS 36 d	AS 34 d	AS 74 d	AS 69 d	AS67 d
B2	AS 31 d	AS 29 d	AS 26 d	AS 64 d	AS 62 d	AS59 d
B3	AS 21 d	AS 18 d	AS 16 d	AS 54 d	AS 51 d	AS49 d
B4	AS 10 d	AS 7 d	AS 5 d	AS 43 d	AS 40 d	AS38 d
B5	AS 5 d	AS 1 d	Silking	AS 38 d	AS 34 d	AS33 d
B6	V14	V12	V12	AS 27 d	AS 24 d	AS22 d
B7	V7	V8	V7	AS 17 d	AS 12 d	AS10 d
B8	V6	V6	V6	AS 8 d	AS 4 d	AS2 d

播期	7月25日			8月27日
播期	FK139	JNK728	ZD958	FK139	JNK728	ZD958
B1	2.3b	2.5b	2.1c	2.3d	2.5d	2.1d
B2	2.2c	2.6a	2.2c	2.1e	2.5d	2.2cd
B3	2.4a	2.6a	2.5b	2.4bc	2.6cd	2.5b
B4	2.5a	2.7a	2.4b	2.5ab	2.7bc	2.5b
B5	2.5a	2.8a	2.6a	2.5a	2.9a	2.6a
B6	1.9d	2.0c	1.7d	2.4bc	2.8ab	2.5b
B7	1.2e	1.0d	0.9e	2.4c	2.6cd	2.2c
B8	0.3f	0.3e	0.3f	2.1e	2.2e	1.9e

测量日期	品种	相关系数
测量日期	品种	RGB图像	多光谱图
7月25日	FK139	0.818^*	0.486
	JNK728	0.954^**	0.774^*
	ZD958	0.945^**	0.737^*
	——	0.900^**	0.672^**
8月27日	FK139	0.478	0.306
	JNK728	0.549	0.272
	ZD958	0.797^*	0.415
	——	0.604^**	0.332

[1]	DAI Mian, YANG Tianle, YAO Zhaosheng, LIU Tao, SUN Chengming. Wheat Biomass Estimation in Different Growth Stages Based on Color and Texture Features of UAV Images [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(1): 71-83.
[2]	LI Shuangwei, ZHU Junqi, EVERS Jochem B., VAN DER WERF Wopke, GUO Yan, LI Baoguo, MA Yuntao. Estimating the Differences of Light Capture Between Rows Based on Functional-Structural Plant Model in Simultaneous Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(1): 97-109.
[3]	CHEN Meixiang, ZHANG Ruirui, CHEN Liping, TANG Qing, XIA Lang. Investigation on Advances of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Application Research in Agriculture and Forestry [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(3): 22-37.
[4]	WANG Guobin, HAN Xin, SONG Cancan, YI Lili, LU Wenxia, LAN Yubin. Evaluation of Droplet Size and Drift Distribution of Herbicide Sprayed by Plant Protection Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Winter Wheat Field [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(3): 38-51.
[5]	ZI Le, ZANG Yu, HUANG Junhao, BAO Ruifeng, ZHOU Zhiyan, XIAO Hanxiang. Effects on Control Efficacy of Pesticide-Adjuvants Mixture against Rice Chilo Suppressalis(walker) Based on Plant Protection Unmanned Aerial Vehicle [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(3): 52-59.
[6]	TANG Qing, ZHANG Ruirui, CHEN Liping, LI Longlong, XU Gang. Research Progress of Key Technologies and Verification Methods of Numerical Modeling for Plant Protection Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Application [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(3): 1-21.
[7]	ZHANG Xiaoqing, SHAO Song, GUO Xinyu, FAN Jiangchuan. High-Throughput Dynamic Monitoring Method of Field Maize Seedling [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(2): 88-99.
[8]	WANG Weidan, SUN Li, PEI Zhiyuan, MA Shangjie, CHEN Yuanyuan, SUN Juanying, DONG Mo. Effect of Growing Season Drought and Flood on Yield of Spring Maize in Three Northeast Provinces of China [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(2): 126-137.
[9]	SHU Meiyan, CHEN Xiangyang, WANG Xiqing, MA Yuntao. Estimation of Maize Leaf Area Index and Aboveground Biomass Based on Hyperspectral Data [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(1): 29-39.
[10]	ZHU Chao, WU Fan, LIU Changbin, ZHAO Jianxiang, LIN Lili, TIAN Xueying, MIAO Teng. Tassel Segmentation of Maize Point Cloud Based on Super Voxels Clustering and Local Features [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(1): 75-85.
[11]	ZHAO Huan, WANG Jinglu, LIAO Shengjin, ZHANG Ying, LU Xianju, GUO Xinyu, ZHAO Chunjiang. Study on the Micro-Phenotype of Different Types of Maize Kernels Based on Micro-CT [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(1): 16-28.
[12]	SHAO Guomin, WANG Yajie, HAN Wenting. Estimation Method of Leaf Area Index for Summer Maize Using UAV-Based Multispectral Remote Sensing [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(3): 118-128.
[13]	Yang Chenghai. Airborne remote sensing systems for precision agriculture applications [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(1): 1-22.
[14]	Wu Gang, Peng Yaoqi, Zhou Guangqi, Li Xiaolong, Zheng Yongjun, Yan Haijun. Recognition method for corn nutrient based on multispectral image and convolutional neural network [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(1): 111-120.
[15]	Wan Liang, Cen Haiyan, Zhu Jiangpeng, Zhang Jiafei, Du Xiaoyue, He Yong. Using fusion of texture features and vegetation indices from water concentration in rice crop to UAV remote sensing monitor [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(1): 58-67.