基于计算机视觉的奶牛生理参数监测与疾病诊断研究进展及挑战

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.SA202204005

Smart Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2): 1-18.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202204005

• 专题——智慧畜牧关键技术与装备 • 下一篇

基于计算机视觉的奶牛生理参数监测与疾病诊断研究进展及挑战

康熙¹^,²^,³(), 刘刚¹^,²(), 初梦苑¹^,², 李前¹^,², 王彦超¹^,²

^1.中国农业大学智慧农业系统集成研究教育部重点实验室，北京 100083
^2.中国农业大学农业农村部农业信息获取技术重点实验室，北京 100083
^3.浙大宁波理工学院计算机与数据工程学院，浙江宁波 315200

收稿日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2022-06-30
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1300502)
作者简介:康熙（1992－），男，博士，研究方向为农业健康养殖智能信息技术。E-mail：B20183080643@cau.edu.cn
通信作者: 刘刚（1966－），男，博士，教授，研究方向为电子信息技术在农业中的应用。E-mail：pac@cau.edu.cn

Advances and Challenges in Physiological Parameters Monitoring and Diseases Diagnosing of Dairy Cows Based on Computer Vision

KANG Xi¹^,²^,³(), LIU Gang¹^,²(), CHU Mengyuan¹^,², LI Qian¹^,², WANG Yanchao¹^,²

^1.Key Lab of Smart Agriculture Systems, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
^2.Key Laboratory of Agricultural Information Acquisition Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
^3.School of Computing and Data Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo 315200, China

Received:2022-04-28 Online:2022-06-30
corresponding author: LIU Gang, E-mail：pac@cau.edu.cn
About author:KANG Xi,E-mail：B20183080643@cau.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFD1300502)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用先进的信息技术推动智能养殖业发展已经成为奶牛养殖研究领域的重要目标和任务。计算机视觉技术具有非接触、免应激、低成本及高通量等优点，在畜牧生产中应用前景广阔。本文在阐述了计算机视觉技术在智能化养殖业发展中重要性的基础上，首先介绍了基于计算机视觉的奶牛生理参数监测进展，包括体尺、体温、体重的前沿监测设备、技术和模型参数。然后阐述了奶牛跛行及乳腺炎等疾病诊断的前沿技术发展过程和研究现状。目前，相关技术研究和应用推广存在检测准确性不高，受环境因素影响较大，非标准化养殖场结构制约检测系统普及，以及检测系统成本较高等问题和挑战。最后，本文结合中国养殖业发展现状，针对保证检测准确性、减少环境干扰等问题，就如何提高计算机视觉技术在智能化养殖业中的准确性和普适性提出了相关建议，旨在为中国奶牛养殖业的科学管理和现代化生产提供新方法和新思路。

关键词: 奶牛养殖, 计算机视觉, 生理参数监测, 疾病诊断, 精细畜牧业, 智能养殖

Abstract:

Realizing the construction of intelligent farming by using advanced information technology, thus improving the living welfare of dairy cows and the economic benefits of dairy farms has become an important goal and task in dairy farming research field. Computer vision technology has the advantages of non-contact, stress-free, low cost and high throughput, and has a broad application prospect in animal production. On the basis of describing the importance of computer vision technology in the development of intelligent farming industry, this paper introduced the cutting-edge technology of cow physiological parameters and disease diagnosis based on computer vision, including cow temperature monitoring, body size monitoring, weight measurement, mastitis detection and lameness detection. The introduction coverd the development process of these studies, the current mainstream techniques, and discussed the problems and challenges in the research and application of related technology, aiming at the problem that the current computer vision-based detection methods are susceptible to individual difference and environmental changes. Combined with the development status of farming industry, suggestions on how to improve the universality of computer vision technology in intelligent farming industry, how to improve the accuracy of monitoring cows' physiological parameters and disease diagnosis, and how to reduce the influence of environment on the system were put forward. Future research work should focus on research and developmentof algorithm, make full use of computer vision technology continuous detection and the advantage of large amount of data, to ensure the accuracy of the detection, and improve the function of the system integration and data utilization, expand the computer vision system function. Under the premise that does not affect the ability of the system, to improve the study on the number of function integration and system function and reduce equipment costs.

Key words: dairy farming, computer vision technology, physiological parameters monitoring, diseases diagnosing, precision livestock farming, intelligent farming

中图分类号:

康熙, 刘刚, 初梦苑, 李前, 王彦超. 基于计算机视觉的奶牛生理参数监测与疾病诊断研究进展及挑战[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(2): 1-18.

KANG Xi, LIU Gang, CHU Mengyuan, LI Qian, WANG Yanchao. Advances and Challenges in Physiological Parameters Monitoring and Diseases Diagnosing of Dairy Cows Based on Computer Vision[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(2): 1-18.

图/表 8

图1

表 1

图2

表 2

表3

表 4

表5

图3

参考文献 124

1	王艳阳, 李彤, 刘佳丽, 等. 中国奶牛产业发展现状与对策[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017(24): 23-26.
2	陈艳飞. 奶牛产业发展现状与未来[J]. 养殖与饲料, 2018(7): 105-106.
3	农业农村部: "十四五"奶业竞争力提升行动方案[J]. 北方牧业, 2022(5):14-15.
4	李胜利, 姚琨, 曹志军, 等. 2021年奶牛产业技术发展报告[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022(3): 244-249.
5	刘一明. 实施九大任务提振奶业发展——"十四五"奶业竞争力如何提升有了行动方案[N]. 农民日报, 2022-03-03(6).
6	刘继芳, 韩书庆, 齐秀丽. 中国信息化畜禽养殖技术应用现状与展望[J]. 中国乳业, 2021(12): 47-52.
	LIU J, HAN S, QI X. Application progress and prospects of the livestock and poultry informatized breeding technology in China[J]. China Dairy, 2021(12): 47-52.
7	王国占, 侯方安, 车宇. 国内外无人化农业发展状况[J]. 农机科技推广, 2020(8): 8-9, 15.
8	高学杰. 高产奶牛养殖技术要点与疾病防控[J]. 畜禽业, 2022, 33(3): 128-130.
9	滕光辉. 畜禽设施精细养殖中信息感知与环境调控综述[J]. 智慧农业, 2019,1(3): 1-12.
	TENG G. Information sensing and environment control of precision facility livestock and poultry farming[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2019, 1(3): 1-12.
10	赵春江.智慧农业发展现状及战略目标研究[J].智慧农业, 2019, 1(1): 1-7.
	ZHAO C. State-of-the-art and recommended developmental strategic objectives of smart agriculture[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2019, 1(1): 1-7.
11	韩书庆, 张晶, 程国栋, 等. 奶牛跛行自动识别技术研究现状与挑战[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2020, 2(3): 21-36.
	HAN S, ZHANG J, CHENG G, et al. Current state and challenges of automatic lameness detection in dairy cattle[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(3): 21-36.
12	徐文娇, 董彦君, 董玉兰, 等. 不同年龄段奶牛临床参数和血常规生理指标调查分析[J]. 中国兽医杂志, 2017, 53(10): 28-30.
	XU W, DONG Y, DONG Y, et al. Different age paragraph the cow clinical parameters and routine blood physiological index analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 53(10): 28-30.
13	吴宇峰, 李一鸣, 赵远洋, 等. 基于计算机视觉的奶牛体况评分研究综述[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(S1): 268-275.
	WU Y, LI Y, ZHAO Y, et al. Review of research on body condition score for dairy cows based on computer vision[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2021, 52(S1): 268-275.
14	张小栓, 张梦杰, 王磊, 等. 畜牧养殖穿戴式信息监测技术研究现状与发展分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(11): 1-14.
	ZHANG X, ZHANG M, WANG L, et al. Research status and development analysis of wearable information monitoring technology in animal husbandry[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019, 50(11): 1-14.
15	李胜利, 姚琨, 曹志军, 等. 2021年奶牛产业技术发展报告[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(3): 239-244.
	LI S, YAO K, CAO Z, et al. Technical development report of the dairy industry in 2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2022, 58(3): 239-244.
16	STAJNKO D, BRUS M, HOČEVAR M. Estimation of bull live weight through thermographically measured body dimensions[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2008, 61(2): 233-240.
17	TAŞDEMIR Ş, ÜRKMEZ A, İNAL Ş. A fuzzy rule-based system for predicting the live weight of Holstein cows whose body dimensions were determined by image analysis[J]. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 2011, 19(4): 689-703.
18	郭浩, 张胜利, 马钦, 等. 基于点云采集设备的奶牛体尺指标测量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(5): 116-122.
	GUO H, ZHANG S, MA Q, et al. Cow body measurement based on Xtion[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014, 30(5): 116-122.
19	MARINELLO F, PEZZUOLO A, CILLIS D, et al. Application of Kinect-Sensor for three-dimensional body measurements of cows[C]// 7th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, ECPLF 2015. Milan, Italy: European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, 2015: 661-669.
20	NIR O, PARMET Y, WERNER D, et al. 3D Computer-vision system for automatically estimating heifer height and body mass[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2018, 173: 4-10.
21	PEZZUOLO A, GUARINO M, SARTORI L, et al. A feasibility study on the use of a structured light depth-camera for three-dimensional body measurements of dairy cows in free-stall barns[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(3): ID 673.
22	LE COZLER Y, ALLAIN C, CAILLOT A, et al. High-precision scanning system for complete 3D cow body shape imaging and analysis of morphological traits[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 157: 447-453.
23	李琦, 刘伟, 赵建敏. 基于双目视觉及Mask RCNN的牛体尺无接触测量[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2020(12): 46-50.
	LI Q, LIU W, ZHAO J. Non-contact measurement of bovine body size based on binocular vision and Mask RCNN[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2020(12): 46-50.
24	初梦苑. 基于三维重建的奶牛体尺检测与体重预估研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2020.
	CHU M. Research on body measurement and weight estimation of cows based on 3D reconstruction[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2020.
25	KAMCHEN S G, SANTOS E FDOS, LOPES L B, et al. Application of depth sensor to estimate body mass and morphometric assessment in Nellore heifers[J]. Livestock Science, 2021, 245: ID 104442.
26	ZHANG J, ZHUANG Y, JI H, et al. Pig weight and body size estimation using a multiple output regression convolutional neural network: A fast and fully automatic method[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(9): ID 3218.
27	GUO H, MA X, MA Q, et al. LSSA_CAU: An interactive 3D point clouds analysis software for body measurement of livestock with similar forms of cows or pigs[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017, 138: 60-68.
28	FORBES A, DE OLIVEIRA M, DENNIS M R. Structured light[J]. Nature Photonics, 2021, 15(4): 253-262.
29	HEINRICHS A J, ROGERS G W, COOPER J B. Predicting body weight and wither height in Holstein heifers using body measurements[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1992, 75(12): 3576-3581.
30	LESOSKY M, DUMAS S, CONRADIE I, et al. A live weight-heart girth relationship for accurate dosing of east African shorthorn zebu cattle[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2012, 45(1): 311-316.
31	刘忠超, 范伟强, 何东健. 奶牛体温检测研究进展[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2018(19): 41-44.
	LIU Z, FAN W, HE D. Research progress of body temperature detection in dairy cows[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2018(19): 41-44.
32	何东健, 宋子琪. 基于热红外成像与骨架树模型的奶牛眼温自动检测[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(3): 243-250.
	HE D, SONG Z. Automatic detection of dairy cow's eye temperature based on thermal infrared imaging technology and skeleton tree model[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2021, 52(3): 243-250.
33	张磊, 董茹月, 侯宇, 等.奶牛体温评价指标及测定方法研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(2): 548-557.
	ZHANG L, DONG R, HOU Y, et al. Research progress on evaluation indices and measurements of body temperature in dairy cows[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32(2): 548-557.
34	CUTHBERTSON H, TARR G, GONZÁLEZ L A. Methodology for data processing and analysis techniques of infrared video thermography used to measure cattle temperature in real time[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 167: ID 105019.
35	WILLARD S, DRAY S, FARRAR R, et al. Use of infrared thermal imaging to quantify dynamic changes in body temperature following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration in dairy cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 85: ID26.
36	HOFFMANN G, SCHMIDT M, AMMON C, et al. Monitoring the body temperature of cows and calves using video recordings from an infrared thermography camera[J]. Veterinary Research Communications, 2013, 37(2): 91-99.
37	SALLES M S V, SILVA S CDA, SALLES F A, et al. Mapping the body surface temperature of cattle by infrared thermography[J]. Journal of Thermal Biology, 2016, 62: 63-69.
38	PENG D, CHEN S, LI G, et al. Infrared thermography measured body surface temperature and its relationship with rectal temperature in dairy cows under different temperature-humidity indexes[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2019, 63(3): 327-336.
39	何金成, 张鲜, 李素青, 等. 环境温湿度及测量部位对奶牛红外热成像温度的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 46(4): 500-508.
	HE J, ZHANG X, LI S, et al. Effects of ambient temperature and relative humidity and measurement site on the cow's body temperature measured by infrared thermography[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agric. & Life Sci.), 2020, 46(4): 500-508.
40	JADDOA M A, GONZALEZ L, CUTHBERTSON H, et al. Multiview eye localisation to measure cattle body temperature based on automated thermal image processing and computer vision[J]. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2021, 119: ID 103932.
41	张旭东, 康熙, 马丽, 等. 基于热红外图像的奶牛乳房炎自动检测方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(S1): 248-255, 282.
	ZHANG X, KANG X, MA L, et al. Automatic detection method of dairy cow mastitis based on thermal infrared image[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019, 50(S1): 248-255, 282.
42	ZHANG X, KANG X, FENG N, et al. Automatic recognition of dairy cow mastitis from erthmal images by a deep learning detector[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020, 178: ID 105754.
43	孙雨坤, 岳奎忠, 李文茜, 等. 图像信息技术在奶牛生产中的应用[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(5): 1626-1632.
	SUN Y, YUE K, LI W, et al. Application of image information technology in dairy cow production[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(5): 1626-1632.
44	KUZUHARA Y, KAWAMURA K, YOSHITOSHI R, et al. A preliminarily study for predicting body weight and milk properties in lactating Holstein cows using a three-dimensional camera system[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 111: 186-193.
45	HANSEN M F, SMITH M L, SMITH L N, et al. Automated monitoring of dairy cow body condition, mobility and weight using a single 3D video capture device[J]. Computers in Industry, 2018, 98: 14-22.
46	TASDEMIR S, URKMEZ A, INAL S. Determination of body measurements on the Holstein cows using digital image analysis and estimation of live weight with regression analysis[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011, 76(2): 189-197.
47	张立倩. 基于模糊逼近计算视觉算法的奶牛体重测量[J]. 科技通报, 2013, 29(11): 149-152.
	ZHANG L. The cows weight calculation based on non-measurement machine vision[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2013, 29(11): 149-152.
48	SONG X, BOKKERS E A M, VAN DER TOL P P J, et al. Automated body weight prediction of dairy cows using 3-dimensional vision[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(5): 4448-4459.
49	牛金玉. 基于三维点云的奶牛体尺测量与体重预测方法研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.
	NIU J. Body size measurement and weight prediction for dairy cows based on 3D point cloud[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2018.
50	LE COZLER Y, ALLAIN C, XAVIER C, et al. Volume and surface area of Holstein dairy cows calculated from complete 3D shapes acquired using a high-precision scanning system: Interest for body weight estimation[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 165: ID 104977.
51	初梦苑, 刘刚, 司永胜, 等. 基于三维重建的奶牛体重预估方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(S1): 378-384.
	CHU M, LIU G, SI Y, et al. Predicting method of dairy cow weight based on three-dimensional reconstruction[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020, 51(S1): 378-384.
52	MEHMET K, BARDAKÇIOĞLU H E. Estimation of body weight and body condition score in dairy cows by digital image analysis method[J]. Veterinary Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 2021, 6(3): 115-121.
53	孙晓玉, 韩广文, 于孟虎,等. 荷斯坦牛体尺、体重性状遗传参数的估测及与产奶性能的相关分析[J]. 中国奶牛, 1999(3): 39-40.
	SUN X, HAN G, YU M, et al. Estimation of genetic parameters of body size and body weight in Holstein cattle and their correlation with milk production performance[J]. China Dairy Cattle, 1999(3): 39-40.
54	XIANG Y, NAKAMURA S, TAMARI H, et al. 3D model generation of cattle by shape-from-silhouette method for ict agriculture[C]// 2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS). Piscataway, New York, USA: IEEE, 2016: 611-616.
55	XAVIER C, LE COZLER Y, DEPUILLE L, et al. The use of 3-dimensional imaging of Holstein cows to estimate body weight and monitor the composition of body weight change throughout lactation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2022, 105(5): 4508-4519.
56	RUCHAY A, KOBER V, DOROFEEV K, et al. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting live weight of Hereford cows[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 195: ID 106837.
57	杭孝.早期预警在奶牛疾病中的应用分析[J].今日畜牧兽医, 2021, 37(9): 25-26.
58	季凤娟. 奶牛常见疾病的防治措施[J].畜禽业, 2022, 33(1): 111-112.
59	HORTET P, SEEGERS H. Loss in milk yield and related composition changes resulting from clinical mastitis in dairy cows[J]. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 1998, 37(1-4): 1-20.
60	彭丹丹, 陈健, 赵越, 等. 脏污程度对奶牛乳区温度分布规律的研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2016, 47(4): 844-851.
	PENG D, CHEN J, ZHAO Y, et al. Effect of smudgy degree on temperature distribution of the udder surface in dairy cow[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2016, 47(4): 844-851.
61	VIGUIER C, ARORA S, GILMARTIN N, et al. Mastitis detection: Current trends and future perspectives[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2009, 27(8): 486-493.
62	MIR A Q, BANSAL B K, GUPTA D K. Subclinical mastitis in machine milked dairy farms in Punjab: Prevalence, distribution of bacteria and current antibiogram[J]. Veterinary World, 2014, 7(5): 291-294.
63	SCHUKKEN Y H, WILSON D J, WELCOME F, et al. Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts[J]. Veterinary Research, 2003, 34(5): 579-596.
64	MAURO Z, VERONICA R, FABIO L, et al. First evaluation of infrared thermography as a tool for the monitoring of udder health status in farms of dairy cows[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(3): ID 862.
65	蔡一欣, 马丽, 刘刚. 奶牛隐性乳房炎便携式计算机视觉快速检测系统设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(S1): 63-69.
	CAI Y, MA L, LIU G. Design and experiment of rapid detection system of cow subclinical mastitis based on portable computer vision technology [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017, 33(S1): 63-69.
66	VOORT M, JENSEN D, KAMPHUIS C, et al. Invited review: Toward a common language in data-driven mastitis detection research[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2021, 104(10): 10449-10461.
67	LVENDAHL P, SRENSEN L P. Frequently recorded sensor data may correctly provide health status of cows if data are handled carefully and errors are filtered away [J]. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 2016, 20(1): 3-12.
68	DENG Z, HOGEVEEN H, LAM T, et al. Performance of online somatic cell count estimation in automatic milking systems[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2020, 7: ID 221.
69	JORGENSEN C H, KRISTENSEN A R, OSTERGAARD S, et al. Use of online measures of l-lactate dehydrogenase for classification of posttreatment mammary Staphylococcus aureus infection status in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(10): 8375-8383.
70	DALEN G, RACHAH A, NORSTEBO H, et al. The detection of intramammary infections using online somatic cell counts[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(6): 5419-5429.
71	HOGEVEEN H, KAMPHUIS C, STEENEVELD W, et al. Sensors and clinical mastitis: The quest for the perfect alert [J]. Sensors, 2010, 10(9): 7991-8009.
72	DOMINIAK K N, KRISTENSEN A R. Prioritizing alarms from sensor-based detection models in livestock production—A review on model performance and alarm reducing methods[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017, 133: 46-67.
73	JONES B F, PLASSMANN P. Digital infrared thermal imaging of human skin [J]. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 2002, 21(6): 41-48.
74	SATHIYABARATHI M, JEYAKUMAR S, MANIMARAN A, et al. Infrared thermography to monitor body and udder skin surface temperature differences in relation to subclinical and clinical mastitis condition in Karan fries (bos taurus×bos indicus) crossbred cows[J]. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2018, 88(6): 694-699.
75	杨春合, 顾宪红, 曹正辉, 等. 奶牛左右乳区温度温差作为隐性乳房炎检测指标的可行性研究[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2015, 46(9): 1663-1670.
	YANG C, GU X, CAO Z, et al. Study on possibility of left and right quarter skin temperature difference as a detecting indicator for subclinical mastitis in dairy cows[J]. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2015, 46 (9): 1663-1670.
76	郭艳娇, 杨圣慧, 迟宇, 等. 基于热红外图像的奶牛乳区温度分布与乳房炎识别方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(2): 250-259.
	GUO Y, YANG S, CHI Y, et al. Recognizing mastitis using temperature distribution from thermal infrared images in cow udder regions[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2022, 38(2): 250-259.
77	王彦超, 康熙, 李孟飞, 等.基于改进YOLO v3-tiny的奶牛乳房炎自动检测方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021,52(S1): 276-283.
	WANG Y, KANG X, LI M, et al. Automatic detection method for dairy cow mastitis based on improved YOLOv3-tiny[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2021, 52(S1): 276-283.
78	HOVINEN M, SIIVONEN J, TAPONEN S, et al. Detection of clinical mastitis with the help of a thermal camera[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, 91(12): 4592-4598.
79	WOLLOWSKI L, BERTULAT S, KOSSATZ A, et al. Short communication: Diagnosis and classification of clinical and subclinical mastitis utilizing a dynamometer and a handheld infrared thermometer[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(7): 6532-6539.
80	陈丽媛, 洪小华, 颜培实. 我国南方冬季和夏季肉牛体感温度研究[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2015, 47(2): 40-44.
	CHEN L, HONG X, YAN P. Effective temperature equation of cows during winter and summer seasons in southern of China[J]. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2015, 47(2), 40-44.
81	FRANZE U, GEIDEL S, HEYDE U, et al. Investigation of infrared thermography for automatic health monitoring in dairy cows[J]. Züchtungskunde, 2012, 84(2): 158-170.
82	BERRY R J, KENNEDY A D, SCOTT S L, et al. Daily variation in the udder surface temperature of dairy cows measured by infrared thermography: Potential for mastitis detection[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2003, 83(4): 687-693.
83	POURSABERI A, BAHR C, PLUK A, et al. Real-time automatic lameness detection based on back posture extraction in dairy cattle: Shape analysis of cow with image processing techniques [J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010, 74(1): 110-119.
84	TADICH N, FLOR E, GREEN L. Associations between hoof lesions and locomotion score in 1098 unsound dairy cows[J]. The Veterinary Journal, 2010, 184(1): 60-65.
85	SJÖSTRÖM K, FALL N, BLANCO-PENEDO I, et al. Lameness prevalence and risk factors in organic dairy herds in four European countries[J]. Livestock Science, 2018, 208: 44-50.
86	GRIMM K, HAIDN B, ERHARD M, et al. New insights into the association between lameness, behavior, and performance in Simmental cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(3): 2453-2468.
87	AFONSO J S, BRUCE M, KEATING P, et al. Profiling detection and classification of lameness methods in British dairy cattle research: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2020, 7: 542-562.
88	SPRECHER D J, HOSTETLER D E, KANEENE J B. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance[J]. Theriogenology 1997, 47: 1179-1187.
89	SCHLAGETER-TELLO A, BOKKERS E A M, KOERKAMP P W G G, et al. Relation between observed locomotion traits and locomotion score in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, 98(12): 8623-8633.
90	ALSAAOD M, FADUL M, STEINER A. Automatic lameness detection in cattle[J]. The Veterinary Journal, 2019, 246: 35-44.
91	PIETTE D, NORTON T, EXADAKTYLOS V, et al. Individualised automated lameness detection in dairy cows and the impact of historical window length on algorithm performance[J]. Animal, 2020, 14(2): 409-417.
92	POURSABERI A, BAHR C, PLUK A, et al. Real-time automatic lameness detection based on back posture extraction in dairy cattle: Shape analysis of cow with image processing techniques[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010, 74(1): 110-119.
93	宋怀波, 姜波, 吴倩, 等. 基于头颈部轮廓拟合直线斜率特征的奶牛跛行检测方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(15): 190-199.
	SONG H, JIANG B, WU Q, et al. Detection of dairy cow lameness based on fitting line slope feature of head and neck outline[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(15): 190-199.
94	KANG X, ZHANG X D, LIU G. Accurate detection of lameness in dairy cattle with computer vision: A new and individualized detection strategy based on the analysis of the supporting phase[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2020, 103(11): 10628-10638.
95	JIANG B, SONG H, WANG H, et al. Dairy cow lameness detection using a back curvature feature[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 194: 106729-106731.
96	KANG X, LI S, LI Q, et al. Dimension-reduced spatiotemporal network for lameness detection in dairy cows[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 197: 106922-106932.
97	VIAZZI S, BAHR C, HERTEM TVAN, et al. Comparison of a three-dimensional and two-dimensional camera system for automated measurement of back posture in dairy cows[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2014, 100: 139-147.
98	JABBAR K A, HANSEN M F, SMITH M L, et al. Early and non-intrusive lameness detection in dairy cows using 3-dimensional video[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2017, 153: 63-69.
99	ALSAAOD M, BÜSCHER W. Detection of hoof lesions using digital infrared thermography in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 95(2): 735-742.
100	ALSAAOD M, SYRING C, DIETRICH J, et al. A field trial of infrared thermography as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for early detection of digital dermatitis in dairy cows[J]. The Veterinary Journal, 2014, 199(2): 281-285.
101	康熙, 李树东, 张旭东, 等. 基于热红外视频的奶牛跛行运动特征提取与检测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(23): 169-178.
	KANG X, LI S, ZHANG X, et al. Features extraction and detection of cow lameness movement based on thermal infrared videos[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2021, 37(23): 169-178.
102	FLOWER F C, SANDERSON D J, WEARY D M. Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2005, 88(9): 3166-3173.
103	RUTTEN C J, VELTHUIS A G J, STEENEVELD W, et al. Invited review: Sensors to support health management on dairy farms[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(4): 1928-1952.
104	JIANG B, WU Q, YIN X, et al. FLYOLOv3 deep learning for key parts of dairy cow body detection[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 166: 104982-104990.
105	OKURA F, IKUMA S, MAKIHARA Y, et al. RGB-D video-based individual identification of dairy cows using gait and texture analyses[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 165: 104944-104953.
106	BEGGS D S, JONGMAN E C, HEMSWORTH P H, et al. Lame cows on Australian dairy farms: A comparison of farmer-identified lameness and formal lameness scoring, and the position of lame cows within the milking order[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(2): 1522-1529.
107	VIAZZI S, BAHR C, SCHLAGETER-TELLO A, et al. Analysis of individual classification of lameness using automatic measurement of back posture in dairy cattle[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(1): 257-266.
108	WEIGELE H C, GYGAX L, STEINER A, et al. Moderate lameness leads to marked behavioral changes in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(3): 2370-2382.
109	JONES B W. Behavioral gait change characterization and detection using precision dairy monitoring technologies[D]. Lexington: University of Kentucky, 2017.
110	NUFFEL AVAN, ZWERTVAEGHER I, WEYENBERG SVAN, et al. Lameness de-tection in dairy cows: Part 2. Use of sensors to automatically register changes in locomotion or behavior. Animals (Basel) 2015, 5, 861-885.
111	BERCKMANS D, BAHR C, LEROY T, et al. Automatic detection of lameness in dairy cattle—Analyzing image parameters related to lameness[C]// 8th International Livestock Environment Symposium, ILES VIII. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2008: 949-956.
112	SONG X, LEROY T, VRANKEN E, et al. Automatic detection of lameness in dairy cattle—Vision-based trackway analysis in cow's locomotion[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2008, 64(1): 39-44.
113	PLUK A, BAHR C, POURSABERI A,et al. Automatic measurement of touch and release angles of the fetlock joint for lameness detection in dairy cattle using vision techniques[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 95(4): 1738-1748.
114	RADOSTITS O M, GAY C C, HINCHCLIFF K W, et al. Veterinary medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats[M]. London: Saunders Ltd., 2007.
115	POURSABERI A, BAHR C, PLUK A, et al. Online lameness detection in dairy cattle using body movement pattern (BMP)[C]// The 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. Piscataway, New York, USA: IEEE, 2011: 732-736.
116	ZHAO K, BEWLEY J M, HE D, et al. Automatic lameness detection in dairy cattle based on leg swing analysis with an image processing technique[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 148: 226-236.
117	JIANG B, SONG H, HE D. Lameness detection of dairy cows based on a double normal background statistical model[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 158: 140-149.
118	康熙, 张旭东, 刘刚, 等. 基于机器视觉的跛行奶牛牛蹄定位方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(S1): 276-282.
	KANG X, ZHANG X, LIU G, et al. Hoof location method of lame dairy cows based on machine vision[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2019(S1): 276-282.
119	SCHLAGETER-TELLO A, HERTEM TVAN, BOKKERS E A M, et al. Performance of human observers and an automatic 3-dimensional computer-vision-based locomotion scoring method to detect lameness and hoof lesions in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(7): 6322-6335.
120	PIETTE D, NORTON T, EXADAKTYLOS V, et al. Individualised automated lameness detection in dairy cows and the impact of historical window length on algorithm performance[J]. Animals. 2020, 14(2): 409-417.
121	O'LEARY N W, BYRNE D T, O'CONNOR A H, et al. Invited review: Cattle lameness detection with accelerometers[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2020, 103(5): 3895-3911.
122	张珂, 吴志明, 闫若潜, 等. 奶牛养殖场生物安全体系建设的现状、问题及对策[J].动物医学进展, 2016, 37(7): 110-114.
	ZHANG K, WU M, YAN R, et al. Current situation, problems and countermeasures for construction of biosecurity system in dairy farms[J]. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 37(7): 110-114.
123	闫河, 陈晓暾. 我国电子信息制造业出厂价格指数特征探究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2015(10): 75-77.
124	KANG X, ZHANG X, LIU G. A review: Development of computer vision-based lameness detection for dairy cows and discussion of the practical applications[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(3): 753.

文献	年份	设备类型	技术	体尺	研究结果	样本量/个
Stajnko等^［16］	2008	热成像仪	数字图像处理	体高、臀高	标准差为0.10~0.433 cm	12
Taşdemir等^［17］	2011	可见光相机	数字图像处理	肩高、臀高、臀宽、体长	平均精度为97.215%	115
郭浩等^［18］	2014	深度相机	三维点云处理	胸宽、尻宽、前乳头长度等	相对误差小于10%	——
Marinello等^［19］	2015	深度相机	三维点云处理	臀宽、体长、体高、胸围等	手工与算法测量的平均决定系数为0.929	20
Nir等^［20］	2018	深度相机	数字图像处理	体高、臀高	手工与算法测量的平均决定系数为0.969	107
Pezzuolo等^［21］	2018	深度相机	三维点云处理	臀宽、体长、体高、胸深等	相对误差小于6%	20
Le Cozler等^［22］	2019	3D扫描仪	三维点云处理	肩高、臀宽、体宽、坐骨宽度等	手工与3D测量之间平均相关性为0.75	30
李琦等^［23］	2020	可见光相机	三维点云处理	体长、体高、体斜长	平均相对误差为6.24%	15
初梦苑^［24］	2020	深度相机	三维点云处理	胸围	平均相对误差为3.30%	86
Kamchen等^［25］	2021	RGB-D相机	深度学习、数字图像处理	臀宽、臀长、臀高、肩高	平均相对误差为11.58%	260

文献	年份	相机类型	技术	研究目标	研究结果	样本量/个
Hoffmann等^［36］	2013	OPTRIS® PI 160热红外相机	Kenward-Roger近似检验	奶牛身体各部位和外阴温度差异	奶牛眼睛与外阴温度差异最小	22
Salles等^［37］	2016	FLIR Fluke Ti20TM热像仪	Pearson相关性分析	奶牛身体各部位和直肠温度相关性	奶牛前额与直肠温度相关性达到0.9	24
Peng等^［38］	2019	VarioCAM®热红外相机	单因素方差分析	不同温湿度环境下奶牛体表温度和直肠温度变化	体表温度比直肠温度对环境变化更敏感	488
何金成等^［39］	2020	FLIR E60便携式红外热像仪	相关性分析	环境温湿度对体表温度检测影响	环境温度影响较大；眼温与直肠温相关性最高	200
何东健等^［32］	2021	MAG62型热像仪	骨架树模型	奶牛眼温检测	平均绝对误差0.35 ℃、平均相对误差为0.38%	40
Jaddoa等^［40］	2021	FLIR A310、 T420 热红外相机	机器学习与阈值处理	奶牛眼温检测	平均精度为0.72，敏感性0.98	35

文献	年份	设备类型	技术	模型参数	准确率	样本量/个
Tasdemir等^［46］	2011	可见光相机	多元线性回归	体尺	平均相对误差为1.87%	16
张立倩^［47］	2013	可见光相机	模糊逼近算法	体尺	平均相对误差为2.00%	——
Song等^［48］	2017	Kinect v2	多元线性回归	体尺、年龄、胎次	平均相对误差为5.20%	30
牛金玉^［49］	2018	Kinect v2	最小二乘法	体尺	相对均方根误差为2.87%	45
Le Cozler等^［50］	2019	Morpho2D	多元线性回归	体尺、体积、表面积	平均相对误差为2.72%	64
初梦苑等^［51］	2020	Kinect v2	多元线性回归	体积、表面积	平均相对误差为2.04%	86

文献	年份	相机类型	技术	乳房炎检测指标	研究结果	样本量/个
郭艳娇等^［76］	2022	Fotric-625c红外热像仪	线刨法，温度拟合线	奶牛乳房温度拟合线的斜率	奶牛左右患病乳房识别准确率为75%	189
王彦超等^［77］	2021	FLIR-A615	深度学习	眼睛乳房温差法	奶牛乳房炎分类准确率为77.3%	22
张旭东等^［41］	2019	FLIR-A615	热红外图像处理	眼睛乳房温差法	对于乳房炎分类准确率为87.5%	17
Zhang等^［42］	2020	FLIR-A615	深度学习	眼睛乳房温差法	奶牛乳房炎分类准确率为83.33%	30
蔡一欣^［65］	2017	5000USB 摄像头	pH 测试纸图像处理	——	平均相对误差为 3.67%，标准差为1.88%	25

文献	年份	相机类型	分类算法	跛行特征	研究结果	样本量/个
Poursaberi等^［92］	2010	可见光	阈值判别	弓背	灵敏度为100%，特异性为97.60%，准确率为94.70%	184
宋怀波等^［93］	2018	可见光	KNN ^①	头颈部轮廓	准确率为93.00%	30
Kang等^［94］	2020	可见光	阈值判别	对称性	准确率为96.00%	100
Jiang等^［95］	2022	可见光	BiLSTM ^②	弓背	准确率为96.61%	90
Kang等^［96］	2022	可见光	DenseNet	对称性、跟随性	灵敏度为98.50%，特异性为99.25%，准确率为98.50%	456
Viazzi等^［97］	2014	深度	决策树	弓背	灵敏度为82.00%，特异性为91.00%，准确率为90.00%	273
Jabbar等^［98］	2017	深度	SVM ^③	对称性	灵敏度为100.00%，特异性为75.00%，准确率为95.70%	22
Alsaaod和Büscher^［99］	2012	热红外	阈值判别	牛蹄温度	灵敏度为80.00%，特异性为82.90%	24
Alsaaod等^［100］	2014	热红外	阈值判别	前后牛蹄温度差	灵敏度为89.10%，特异性为66.60%	149
康熙等^［101］	2021	热红外	阈值判别	弓背	准确率为90.00%	160

基于计算机视觉的奶牛生理参数监测与疾病诊断研究进展及挑战

Advances and Challenges in Physiological Parameters Monitoring and Diseases Diagnosing of Dairy Cows Based on Computer Vision

在线阅读

知网下载

本地下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 124

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许瑞峰, 王瑶华, 丁文勇, 於俊琦, 闫茂仓, 陈琛. 基于改进YOLOv8和多元特征的对虾发病检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 62-71.
[2]	李道亮, 刘畅. 人工智能在水产养殖中研究应用分析与未来展望[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2020, 2(3): 1-20.
[3]	滕光辉. 畜禽设施精细养殖中信息感知与环境调控综述[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2019, 1(3): 1-12.
[4]	赵一广, 杨亮, 郑姗姗, 熊本海. 家畜智能养殖设备和饲喂技术应用研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2019, 1(1): 20-31.