数字化背景下农村居民生活方式低碳转型研究综述
收稿日期: 2025-12-09
网络出版日期: 2026-03-09
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(72404151)
版权
A Review of The Low-Carbon Transition of Rural Residents' Lifestyle through Digital Empowerment
Received date: 2025-12-09
Online published: 2026-03-09
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(72404151)
Copyright
【目的/意义】 确立“双碳”目标以来，促进居民生活方式低碳转型成为高质量发展的重要议题。本文通过对国内外相关文献的述评，旨在归纳当前农村居民生活方式低碳转型的难点与数字化赋能的可行路径，为该领域研究及相关政策设计提供参考。［进展］通过梳理居民行为研究的主流理论与研究进展，提出当前农村居民生活方式低碳转型的难点主要表现为居民行为需要外部因素强刺激、意识转变还需内在认知渐浸润。进而从数字技术、数字平台两个维度探究数字化背景下农村居民生活方式低碳转型的可行性，并从国家和地方层面对低碳行为驱动政策的研究进行了评述。 【结论/展望】 数字化发展可以通过数字技术提升居民生活体验与效率、以数字金融产品与服务形成新兴载体、以信息的数字化传播扩展认知空间，以及数字社交潜移默化转变固有观念等赋能路径对农村居民生活方式转型形成助力。未来研究还可以从农村居民特征适配的意识与行为引导、生活场景中数字化驱动的深度挖掘、数字化影响的异质性，以及减碳政策的双向优化等角度开展。
丁凡琳 . 数字化背景下农村居民生活方式低碳转型研究综述[J]. 智慧农业, 2026 : 1 -13 . DOI: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202512008
[Significance] Since the establishment of the "dual carbon" goals, promoting the low-carbon transformation of lifestyles has become a core issue of green and high-quality development. However, most existing studies have selected urban residents as the research subject for investigating low-carbon behaviors, systematic exploration from the perspective of rural residents needs to be supplemented. The implementation of the Digital Rural Development Strategy creates favorable conditions for digital empowerment in the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' lifestyles. Based on the perspective of rural residents' behavior, this paper systematically sorts out relevant domestic and international literature, aiming to explore the core difficulties of rural residents' lifestyle low-carbon transformation and the feasible paths of digital empowerment, so as to provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for the deepening of research in this field and the optimization of relevant policies. [Progress] Firstly, the mainstream theories and research findings is reviewed on resident behavior, concluding that existing studies mostly focus on urban residents, with insufficient relevance analysis and in-depth discussion in rural contexts. Secondly, it deeply analyzes the core dilemmas in the low-carbon lifestyle transformation of rural residents from two dimensions: behavior and cognition. At the behavioral level, rural residents have low acceptance of new low-carbon practices; their behavioral decisions are strongly influenced by social relations such as regional and kinship ties, and external strong stimuli are needed to drive behavioral change. At the cognitive level, rural residents have limited exposure to low-carbon knowledge, which hinders the formation of low-carbon awareness. Meanwhile, there is a significant deviation between low-carbon cognition and actual behavior, and more external incentives are required for rural residents to translate awareness into action. The proposal of the Digital Countryside has provided hardware infrastructure and policy support for digitally driving the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' behavior. Accordingly, the common enabling scenarios of digitalization are further sort out in rural life and explores feasible paths for the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' behavior in the digital era. From one aspect, embedding digital technologies and their derivative products to reshape residents' living habits. Specifically, digital technologies can optimize residents' daily experience and efficiency, while digital financial products and services can reduce the cost of low-carbon behavior for rural residents. Form another, using digital platforms as communication media to gradually foster residents' low-carbon awareness. This is reflected in the efficient dissemination of information that expands rural residents' scope of low-carbon knowledge, and digital social interactions that transform their traditional mindsets. Finally, China's current policy system related to guiding residents' low-carbon behavior is reviewed and evaluated. It is characterized by national macro-plans that set the overall development direction, and local policies that focus on strengthening digital infrastructure construction. [Conclusion and Prospect] Digitalization can accurately address the behavioral and conscious difficulties in the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' lifestyles through four paths: technology embedding, financial empowerment, information dissemination, and social guidance. Future research needs to further expand the applicability of low-carbon behavior theories in rural scenarios, verify the carbon reduction effect and heterogeneous impact of digitalization in rural living scenarios, and construct a two-way interactive digital carbon reduction policy system featuring government guidance and resident participation, so as to provide more targeted theoretical support and policy ideas for the coordinated development of rural residents' lifestyle low-carbon transformation and rural revitalization.
| [1] | MUNKSGAARD J, PEDERSEN K A. CO2 accounts for open economies: Producer or consumer responsibility [J]. Energy Policy, 2001, 29(4): 327-334. |
| [2] | 张赫, 张建勋, 王睿, 等. 小城市建成环境对居民出行交通碳排放的影响机理[J]. 城市问题, 2020(7): 4-10, 20. |
| ZHANG H, ZHANG J X, WANG R, et al. Built environment factors influencing CO2 emissions from residential trips in small Chinese cities[J]. Urban Problems, 2020(7): 4-10, 20. | |
| [3] | 谭涛, 张燕媛, 唐若迪, 等. 中国农村居民家庭消费结构分析: 基于QUAIDS模型的两阶段一致估计[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(9): 17-31, 56. |
| TAN T, ZHANG Y Y, TANG R D. An Analysis of the Consumption Structure of Chinese Rural Households: Two-Stage Consistent Estimation Based on the QUAIDS Model[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014(9): 17-31, 56. | |
| [4] | 张腾, 蒋伏心, 韦朕韬. 数字经济能否成为促进我国经济高质量发展的新动能 [J]. 经济问题探索, 2021(1): 25-39. |
| ZHANG T, JIANG F X, WEI Z T. Can digital economy become a new driving force for China's high-quality economic development [J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2021(1): 25-39. | |
| [5] | YU C J, JIA N, LI W Q, et al. Digital inclusive finance and rural consumption structure–evidence from Peking University digital inclusive financial index and China household finance survey[J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2022, 14(1): 165-183. |
| [6] | 崔亚飞, 黄少安, 吴琼. 农户亲环境意向的影响因素及其效应分解研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(12): 45-49. |
| CUI Y F, HUANG S A, WU Q. Influencing factors and the effects of Chinese farmer's pro-environmental intention[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(12): 45-49. | |
| [7] | AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211. |
| [8] | AJZEN I. Attitudes, personality and behaviour[M].Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988. |
| [9] | WILLIS L, LEE E, REYNOLDS K J, et al. The theory of planned behavior and the social identity approach: A new look at group processes and social norms in the context of student binge drinking[J]. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2020, 16(3): 357-383. |
| [10] | ARMITAGE C J, CONNER M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 40(Pt 4): 471-499. |
| [11] | GUAGNANO G A, STERN P C, DIETZ T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling[J]. Environment and Behavior, 1995, 27(5): 699-718. |
| [12] | VAN LIERE K D, DUNLAP R E. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence[J]. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 1980, 44(2): 181-197. |
| [13] | 边俊杰, 段可仪. 城镇居民节能行为、能源效率缺口与公共政策——基于国内30个省份城镇居民的调查[J]. 财政科学, 2023(11): 131-146. |
| BIAN J J, DUAN K Y. Energy saving behavior, energy efficiency gap and public policies of urban residents—Based on a survey of urban residents in 30 provinces in China[J]. Fiscal Science, 2023(11): 131-146. | |
| [14] | 王小华, 温涛. 城乡居民消费行为及结构演化的差异研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015, 32(10): 90-107. |
| WANG X H, WEN T. The evolution of differences about consumption behavior and consumption structure between urban and rural residents[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2015, 32(10): 90-107. | |
| [15] | 彭远春. 城市居民环境认知对环境行为的影响分析[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 21(3): 168-174. |
| PENG Y C. Analysis of the influence of urban residents' environmental cognition on environmental behavior[J]. Journal of Central South University (Social Science), 2015, 21(3): 168-174. | |
| [16] | WILSON A L, BUCKLEY E, BUCKLEY J D, et al. Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2016, 51: 47-64. |
| [17] | 句华. 助推理论与政府购买公共服务政策创新[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43(2): 74-80. |
| JU H. Nudge theory and policy innovation in government purchase of public services[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 43(2): 74-80. | |
| [18] | WANG J S. Nudging for social change: Promises and cautions for social workers to apply behavioural economic tools[J]. The British Journal of Social Work, 2023, 53(2): 775-793. |
| [19] | 蒋琳莉, 张露, 张俊飚, 等. 稻农低碳生产行为的影响机理研究——基于湖北省102户稻农的深度访谈[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(4): 86-101. |
| JIANG L L, ZHANG L, ZHANG J B, et al. The influence mechanism of rice farmers' low-carbon production behaviors: An analysis based on in-depth interviews with 102 rice farmers in Hubei Province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2018(4): 86-101. | |
| [20] | 唐博文, 郭军. 如何扩大农村内需: 基于农村居民家庭消费的视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(3): 73-87. |
| TANG B W, GUO J. How to expand rural domestic demand: From the perspective of rural household consumption[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022(3): 73-87. | |
| [21] | 黄赜琳, 秦淑悦. 市场一体化对消费升级的影响——基于"量"与"质"的双重考察[J]. 中国人口科学, 2021, 35(5): 18-31, 126. |
| HUANG Z L, QIN S Y. The impact of market integration on consumption upgrading: A study based on "quantity" and "quality"[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2021, 35(5): 18-31, 126. | |
| [22] | 程名望, 张家平. ICT服务业资本存量及其产出弹性估算研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 189-199. |
| CHENG M W, ZHANG J P. Study on the estimation of ICT service industry capital stock and it's output elasticity[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(11): 189-199. | |
| [23] | 臧旭恒, 裴春霞. 转轨时期中国城乡居民消费行为比较研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2007, 24(1): 65-72, 91. |
| ZANG X H, PEI C X. The consumption study of Chinese urban and rural households consumption behavior in transitional period[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2007, 24(1): 65-72, 91. | |
| [24] | 胡日东, 钱明辉, 郑永冰. 中国城乡收入差距对城乡居民消费结构的影响——基于LA/AIDS拓展模型的实证分析[J]. 财经研究, 2014, 40(5): 75-87. |
| HU R D, QIAN M H, ZHENG Y B. The effect of urban-rural income gap on consumption structure of urban and rural residents in China: Empirical analysis based on extended LA/AIDS model[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2014, 40(5): 75-87. | |
| [25] | 贾晋, 温虎, 张齐圣. 正规信贷对农村家庭消费隐含碳排放的影响效应分析——来自中国农村家庭追踪调查数据的证据[J]. 农村经济, 2022(9): 98-106. |
| Jia J, Wen H, Zhang Q S. Analysis of the impact of formal credit on implicit carbon emissions from rural household consumption: Evidence from China family panel studies[J]. Rural Economy, 2022, 98(9): 98-106. | |
| [26] | POOL G J, SCHWEGLER A F. Differentiating among motives for norm conformity[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2007, 29(1): 47-60. |
| [27] | LI C H. China: The consumer revolution[M]. Singapore: Wiley, 1998. |
| [28] | QIAN W, ABDUR RAZZAQUE M, KENG KAH. Chinese cultural values and gift-giving behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2007, 24(4): 214-228. |
| [29] | 滕玉华, 吴素婷, 范世晶, 等. 基于解释结构模型的农村居民生活自愿亲环境行为发生机制研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(11): 34-40. |
| TENG Y H, WU S T, FAN S J, et al. The occurrence mechanism of rural residents' living voluntary pro-environmental behavior[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(11): 34-40. | |
| [30] | 黄河, 刘琳琳, 杨小涵. 情感驱动的实践——城市居民绿色低碳行为促进机制的ARI模型检验[J]. 全球传媒学刊, 2023, 10(2): 60-86. |
| HUANG H, LIU L L, YANG X H. Affect driven public engagement: An empirical study of urban residents' low-carbon behavior promotion mechanism based on ARI model[J]. Global Journal of Media Studies, 2023, 10(2): 60-86. | |
| [31] | 孙玉栋, 王宣桦. 数字普惠金融赋能乡村振兴的实践价值、现实挑战与政策因应[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2023(1): 112-120. |
| SUN Y D, WANG X H. The practical value and practical challenges of digital inclusive finance enabling rural revitalization and the policy response to it[J]. Journal of Beijing Administration Institute, 2023(1): 112-120. | |
| [32] | 易芳馨, 张强, 李瑶, 等. 基于数字驱动的低碳社区治理体系与治理能力提升路径[J]. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(6): 133-140. |
| YI F X, ZHANG Q, LI Y, et al. The high-quality development path of low-carbon communities: A policy implementation framework based on digital driving and behavioral nudging[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30(6): 133-140. | |
| [33] | ZHANG M S, ZHENG Q, XIA-BAUER C. A systematic assessment of low-carbon energy consumption by an integrated approach in rural China[J]. Energy Reports, 2024, 12: 5704-5711. |
| [34] | SCHUHWERK M E, LEFKOFF-HAGIUS R. Green or non-green Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product [J]. Journal of Advertising, 1995, 24(2): 45-54. |
| [35] | 岳婷, 周静, 张新悦, 等. 城市居民低碳涉入: 内涵、维度与影响因素[J]. 管理评论, 2025, 37(10): 50-62. |
| YUE T, ZHOU J, ZHANG X Y, et al. Low-carbon involvement of urban residents: Concept, dimensions and influencing factors[J]. Management Review, 2025, 37(10): 50-62. | |
| [36] | 贾亚娟, 范子珺, 张新奇. 环境价值观对居民绿色低碳生活方式选择意愿的影响——基于环境态度的中介作用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(12): 1-9. |
| JIA Y J, FAN Z J, ZHANG X Q. Influence of environmental values on residents' willingness to choose green and low-carbon lifestyle: Environmental attitudes-based mediation effect[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(12): 1-9. | |
| [37] | 何广文. 从农村居民资金借贷行为看农村金融抑制与金融深化[J]. 中国农村经济, 1999(10): 42-48. |
| HE G W. Financial repression and financial deepening in rural areas from the perspective of rural residents' fund borrowing behavior[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 1999(10): 42-48. | |
| [38] | 廖华. 中国农村居民生活用能现状、问题与应对[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(2): 1-5. |
| LIAO H. Residential energy consumption in rural China: Situation, problems and solutions[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 21(2): 1-5. | |
| [39] | VIARDOT E. The role of cooperatives in overcoming the barriers to adoption of renewable energy[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 63: 756-764. |
| [40] | L?Z?ROIU G, NEGURI?? O, GRECU I, et al. Consumers' decision-making process on social commerce platforms: Online trust, perceived risk, and purchase intentions[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11: 890. |
| [41] | DABBOUS A, TARHINI A. Does sharing economy promote sustainable economic development and energy efficiency Evidence from OECD countries[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2021, 6(1): 58-68. |
| [42] | WU Y N, XU M J, TAO Y, et al. A critical barrier analysis framework to the development of rural distributed PV in China[J]. Energy, 2022, 245(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123277 . |
| [43] | 崔亚飞, Bluemling B. 农户生活垃圾处理行为的影响因素及其效应研究——基于拓展的计划行为理论框架[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(4): 37-42. |
| CUI Y F, B B. Research on the influencing factors and effects of household waste disposal behavior—Based on the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(4): 37-42. | |
| [44] | YAGHOUBI FARANI A, MOHAMMADI Y, GHAHREMANI F. Modeling farmers' responsible environmental attitude and behaviour: A case from Iran[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(27): 28146-28161. |
| [45] | 贾亚娟, 周星, 赵敏娟. 农村居民生活垃圾分类意愿与行为悖离的影响研究——基于村庄环境、村庄制度的调节效应[J]. 江苏大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(5): 70-85. |
| JIA Y J, ZHOU X, ZHAO M J. A study of the influence of deviation between the villagers' willingness and behavior to classify domestic waste—Based on the adjustment effect of village environment and village system[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University (Social Science Edition), 2023, 25(5): 70-85. | |
| [46] | 于水, 鲁光敏, 任莹. 从政府管控到农民参与: 农村环境治理的逻辑转换和路径优化[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(8): 32-40. |
| YU S, LU G M, REN Y. From government control to farmers'participation: The logic conversion and path optimization of rural environmental governance[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022(8): 32-40. | |
| [47] | 张蕾, 蔡志坚, 胡国珠. 农村居民低碳消费行为意向分析——基于计划行为理论[J]. 经济与管理, 2015, 29(5): 92-96. |
| ZHANG L, CAI Z J, HU G Z. Analysis of low-carbon consumption behavior intention of rural residents— Based on the theory of planned behavior[J]. Economy and Management, 2015, 29(5): 92-96. | |
| [48] | ZHANG Z J, LIU Q L. Rational or altruistic: The impact of social media information exposure on Chinese youth's willingness to donate blood[J]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2024, 12: 1359362. |
| [49] | 李研, 安蕊, 王珊珊. 自我意识情绪视角下居民低碳消费意愿模型[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2022, 24(3): 89-102. |
| LI Y, AN R, WANG S S. Model of residents' low-carbon consumption intention from the perspective of self-consciousness emotion[J]. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business, 2022, 24(3): 89-102. | |
| [50] | 袁玉娟, 刘清春, 周平, 等. 城市居民低碳交通意愿与行为一致性研究[J]. 城市问题, 2021(8): 93-102. |
| YUAN Y J, LIU Q C, ZHOU P, et al. Congruence between residents' low-carbon travel intention and behavior[J]. Urban Problems, 2021(8): 93-102. | |
| [51] | ZENG C, NIU D J, LI H F, et al. Public perceptions and economic values of source-separated collection of rural solid waste: A pilot study in China[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2016, 107(C): 166-173. |
| [52] | 陈海贝, 卓翔芝. 数字赋能研究综述[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019, 39(6): 53-60. |
| CHEN H B, ZHUO X Z. A survey of digital empowerment[J]. Library Tribune, 2019, 39(6): 53-60. | |
| [53] | 上官莉娜, 魏楚珂, 杜玉萍. 数字素养促进农民参与乡村治理吗 ——基于主观社会经济地位和政治效能感的中介作用分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 25(1): 54-63. |
| SHANGGUAN L N, WEI C K, DU Y P. Whether digital literacy promote farmers' participation in rural governance or not: Analysis of the mediating role based on subjective socioeconomic status and sense of political efficacy[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 2024, 25(1): 54-63. | |
| [54] | HERMANSSON E, M?RTENSSON L. Empowerment in the midwifery context—A concept analysis[J]. Midwifery, 2011, 27(6): 811-816. |
| [55] | FAULKNER J, LASCHINGER H. The effects of structural and psychological empowerment on perceived respect in acute care nurses[J]. Journal of Nursing Management, 2008, 16(2): 214-221. |
| [56] | RIVA S, CAMERINI A L, ALLAM A, et al. Interactive sections of an Internet-based intervention increase empowerment of chronic back pain patients: Randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2014, 16(8): e180. |
| [57] | YANG J C, ZHANG T, ZHANG L. Research on the influence of digital penetration on the entrepreneurial behavior tendency of rural residents in tourism[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, 26(10): 25549-25567. |
| [58] | 魏宗财, 黄绍琪, 魏纾晴, 等. 珠三角地区居民在线消费行为特征及空间差异[J]. 地理研究, 2024, 43(12): 3249-3264. |
| WEI Z C, HUANG S Q, WEI S Q, et al. Characteristics and spatial heterogeneities of online consumption behavior of residents in Pearl River Delta region[J]. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(12): 3249-3264. | |
| [59] | 高榕蔚, 董红. 数字赋能农村人居环境治理的社会基础与实践逻辑[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(1): 12-20. |
| GAO R W, DONG H. Social conditions and action logic of digital empowerment for rural living environment governance[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2023, 23(1): 12-20. | |
| [60] | 刘导波, 张思麒. 数字经济赋能居民消费: 理论机制与微观证据[J]. 消费经济, 2022, 38(1): 72-82. |
| LIU D B, ZHANG S Q. The digital economy promotes the consumption of residents: Theoretical mechanism and micro evidence[J]. Consumer Economics, 2022, 38(1): 72-82. | |
| [61] | 宋成校, 朱红根, 吴伟萍. 数字乡村建设何以影响农村居民消费——嵌入微观行为的交互分析[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2025, 24(5): 716-725. |
| SONG C X, ZHU H G, WU W P. Effect of digital village construction on rural residents' consumption: Interactive analysis of embedded micro-behavior[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2025, 24(5): 716-725. | |
| [62] | 毛中根, 苏虹. 数智技术赋能居民消费升级: 作用机理、现实挑战与策略选择[J]. 天津社会科学, 2025(4): 92-99. |
| MAO Z G, SU H. Digital intelligence technology empowering residents to upgrade consumption: Mechanism of action, realistic challenges and strategic choices[J]. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2025(4): 92-99. | |
| [63] | HARRISON T, WAITE K. Impact of co-production on consumer perception of empowerment[J]. The Service Industries Journal, 2015, 35(10): 502-520. |
| [64] | 权一章, 谷晓坤. 同途殊归: "平台下乡"缘何导致农村基层集体行动差异 ——基于西北两村"智慧村务平台"的比较分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 25(5): 1-13. |
| QUAN Y Z, GU X K. Divergent outcomes of similar paths: why does the "rural digitalization initiative" Lead to differences in grassroots collective action —based on a comparative analysis of the "smart village governance platform" in two villages in northwest China[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2025, 25(5): 1-13. | |
| [65] | 黄卓, 王萍萍. 数字普惠金融在数字农业发展中的作用[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(5): 27-36. |
| HUANG Z, WANG P P. The role of digital financial inclusion in the development of digital agriculture[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022(5): 27-36. | |
| [66] | 张辽, 刘成飞. 数字普惠金融如何赋能乡村产业振兴[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2024(1): 41-51. |
| ZHANG L, LIU C F. How can digital financial inclusion revitalize rural industries[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2024(1): 41-51. | |
| [67] | 纪园园, 卫雪心, 朱倩. 数字经济对居民消费分布的影响研究——基于分位数回归[J]. 上海经济研究, 2025(10): 66-77. |
| JI Y Y, WEI X X, ZHU Q. The impact of the digital economy on the distribution of household consumption—Evidence from quantile regression[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2025(10): 66-77. | |
| [68] | 周蓉, 刘嫣, 唐雨虹, 等. 数字金融对农村居民互联网借贷的影响机制与效应研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2024(11): 67-79. |
| ZHOU R, LIU Y, TANG Y H, et al. A study on the impact mechanism and effect of digital finance on Internet lending for rural residents[J]. Macroeconomics, 2024(11): 67-79. | |
| [69] | 朱悦, 张军涛. 数字金融发展对城市经济绿色低碳转型的影响研究[J]. 城市问题, 2022(10): 64-71, 81. |
| ZHU Y, ZHANG J T. The impact of digital financedevelopment on green and low-carbon transformation of urban economy[J]. Urban Problems, 2022(10): 64-71, 81. | |
| [70] | 星焱. 农村数字普惠金融的"红利"与"鸿沟"[J]. 经济学家, 2021(2): 102-111. |
| XING Y. "Dividend" and "gap" of rural digital inclusive finance[J]. Economist, 2021(2): 102-111. | |
| [71] | 傅巧灵, 李媛媛, 赵睿. 数字普惠金融推进脱贫地区乡村全面振兴的逻辑、问题与建议[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2022(6): 49-56. |
| FU Q L, LI Y Y, ZHAO R. The logic, problems and suggestions of digital inclusive finance to promote comprehensive rural revitalization of poverty alleviation areas[J]. Macroeconomics, 2022(6): 49-56. | |
| [72] | 刘超, 夏湘玉. 结构重塑与行为调适: 数字技术赋能居民参与社区公共安全治理的实现逻辑[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 49(1): 26-33. |
| LIU C, XIA X Y. Structural remodeling and behavioral adjustment: The logic of digital technology empowerment in facilitating Residents' participation in community public safety governance[J]. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2025, 49(1): 26-33. | |
| [73] | ZIMMERMAN M A. Empowerment theory[M]// Handbook of Community Psychology. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2000: 43-63. |
| [74] | 贾文龙. 数字赋能农村人居环境治理的价值意蕴、偏差审视及优化路径研究[J]. 河南社会科学, 2024, 32(1): 97-108. |
| JIA W L. Research on the value implication, deviation survey and optimization path of digital empowerment for rural living environment governance[J]. Henan Social Sciences, 2024, 32(1): 97-108. | |
| [75] | 潘家华, 廖茂林, 陈素梅. 碳中和: 中国能走多快 [J]. 改革, 2021(7): 1-13. |
| PAN J H, LIAO M L, CHEN S M. Carbon neutrality: How fast can China go [J]. Reform, 2021(7): 1-13. | |
| [76] | 冯子洋, 宋冬林, 谢文帅. 数字经济助力实现"双碳"目标: 基本途径、内在机理与行动策略[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(1): 52-61. |
| FENG Z Y, SONG D L, XIE W S. Digital economy helps realize the "double carbon" goal: Basic approaches, internal mechanisms and action strategies[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 2023(1): 52-61. | |
| [77] | 王爱君, 宋依纯, 彭文慧. 数字治理与社会流动性——基于"信息惠民国家试点"政策的准自然实验[J]. 中国经济问题, 2025(5): 95-109. |
| WANG A J, SONG Y C, PENG W H. Digital governance and social mobility: Evidence from the "national pilot policy of information benefiting the people" in China[J]. China Economic Studies, 2025(5): 95-109. | |
| [78] | 贺达, 顾江. 互联网对农村居民消费水平和结构的影响——基于CFPS数据的PSM实证研究[J]. 农村经济, 2018(10): 51-57. |
| The impact of the Internet on the consumption level and structure of rural residents— An empirical study using PSM based on CFPS data[J]. Rural Economy, 2018(10): 51-57. | |
| [79] | 张必忠, 罗磊, 傅新红. 数字素养赋能农民共同富裕的机制与效应研究[J]. 农村经济, 2025(3): 124-132. |
| ZHANG B Z, LUO L, FU X H. Research on the mechanism and effect of digital literacy empowering farmers' common prosperity[J]. Rural Economy, 2025(3): 124-132. | |
| [80] | 张杰, 魏振琪. 数字经济能否驱动家庭消费低碳转型 ——基于中国家庭追踪调查的经验证据[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2023, 43(9): 3-19. |
| ZHANG J, WEI Z Q. Can the digital economy drive the low-carbon transformation of household consumption Empirical evidence based on CFPS[J]. Modern Finance and Economics-Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 2023, 43(9): 3-19. | |
| [81] | BENOIT S, BAKER T L, BOLTON R N, et al. A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 79: 219-227. |
| [82] | 罗敏, 朱雪忠. 基于共词分析的我国低碳政策构成研究[J]. 管理学报, 2014, 11(11): 1680-1685. |
| LUO M, ZHU X Z. Co-word analysis on low-carbon policies frame in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2014, 11(11): 1680-1685. | |
| [83] | 丁凡琳. 减污降碳协同治理工具选择对居民幸福感的影响——基于三部门均衡模型与中国家庭追踪调查数据库[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 45(11): 98-113. |
| DING F L. The selection of the coordination of pollution and carbon emission reduction tools and its impacts on residents' happiness based on CFPS data[J]. Jinan Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 2023, 45(11): 98-113. | |
| [84] | BORCHERS A M, XIARCHOS I, BECKMAN J. Determinants of wind and solar energy system adoption by U.S. farms: A multilevel modeling approach[J]. Energy Policy, 2014, 69: 106-115. |
| [85] | 田艳平, 李佳锶. 居民政策感知与家庭能源消费低碳化[J]. 消费经济, 2024, 40(1): 61-73. |
| TIAN Y P, LI J S. Perception of resident policies and low carbon household energy consumption[J]. Consumer Economics, 2024, 40(1): 61-73. | |
| [86] | 虞义华, 邓慧慧. 基于空间Probit模型的农村家庭低碳产品购买决策研究[J]. 求索, 2017(12): 45-53. |
| Yu Y H, DENG H H. Research on rural households' low-carbon product purchase decisions based on the spatial probit model[J].Seeker, 2017(12): 45-53. | |
| [87] | GYBERG P, PALM J. Influencing households' energy behaviour—How is this done and on what premises [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(7): 2807-2813. |
| [88] | BENARTZI S, BESHEARS J, MILKMAN K L, et al. Should governments invest more in nudging [J]. Psychological Science, 2017, 28(8): 1041-1055. |
| [89] | CARLSSON F, GRAVERT C, JOHANSSON-STENMAN O, et al. The use of green nudges as an environmental policy instrument[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2021, 15(2): 216-237. |
| [90] | HAGMAN W. When are nudges acceptable Influences of beneficiaries, techniques, alternatives and choice architects [M]. Sweden: Linkpings University, 2018. |
| [91] | BRUNNER F, KURZ V, BRYNGELSSON D, et al. Carbon label at a university restaurant—Label implementation and evaluation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 146(C): 658-667. |
| [92] | 张正平, 董晶. 金融科技赋能农村金融高质量发展的机制与路径[J]. 农业经济问题, 2023(9): 81-95. |
| ZHANG Z P, DONG J. The mechanism and path of fintech enabling the high-quality development of rural finance in China[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2023(9): 81-95. | |
| [93] | 郑美华. 农村数字普惠金融: 发展模式与典型案例[J]. 农村经济, 2019(3): 96-104. |
| ZHENG M H. Rural digital inclusive finance: Development models and typical cases[J]. Rural Economy, 2019(3): 96-104. | |
| [94] | 刘传明, 孙喆, 张瑾. 中国碳排放权交易试点的碳减排政策效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(11): 49-58. |
| LIU C M, SUN Z, ZHANG J. Research on the effect of carbon emission reduction policy in China's carbon emissions trading pilot[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(11): 49-58. | |
| [95] | YU Y T, ZHANG N. Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China[J]. Energy Economics, 2021, 96: 105125. |
| [96] | GOSNELL G K, BAZILIAN M D. Changing behaviour is the key to solving the climate challenge[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2021, 5(3): 294. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
