Welcome to Smart Agriculture 中文

LiteFocus-Net: A Three-Point Lightweight Enhancement Framework for Small-Target Detection of Corn Leaf Diseases and Pests

  • ZHANG YiBo ,
  • MAO Bo ,
  • ZHANG Lei
Expand
  • 1.College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    2.School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
YANG Yu, E-mail: 2514056148@qq.com
ZHANG Yibo, E-mail: feptsss@gmail.com
ZHANG Lei, E-mail: zhanglei@nufe.edu.cn

Received date: 2026-05-12

  Online published: 2026-07-23

Supported by

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2024YFF1105504)

Copyright

copyright©2026 by the authors

Abstract

[Objective] Early detection of corn leaf diseases and pests is important for field monitoring, precision pesticide application, and yield protection. In practical field environments, early lesions, insect bodies, eggs, and spore clusters often occupy only a very small part of the image. Their visual appearance is affected by weak texture, irregular shape, and complex backgrounds, making the visual boundary between disease targets and normal leaf tissue less distinguishable. When lightweight detectors based on the YOLO series are applied, fixed convolution kernels lack flexibility for targets with large scale differences. After repeated downsampling, small objects lose representation in deep feature maps, while larger targets dominate the regression loss. These factors make it difficult to balance detection accuracy and deployment efficiency on edge devices. To improve the recognition capability for small targets under complex field conditions, LiteFocus-Net, a lightweight enhancement framework, was developed based on YOLOv11n. [Methods] The framework improved the baseline model from three closely related aspects: adaptive backbone feature extraction, deep feature detail recovery, and scale-aware regression supervision. In the backbone, an Adaptive Kernel Lightweight Block, named AKL-Block, was designed to replace part of the original feature extraction structure. Instead of computing multiple convolution branches simultaneously during inference, AKL-Block used global average pooling and a lightweight gating module to estimate the selection probabilities of three candidate depthwise separable convolution kernels with different receptive fields. A Gumbel-Softmax strategy was used during training to keep the kernel selection process differentiable, while only the kernel with the highest selection probability is activated during inference. In this way, the model could adjust its effective receptive field according to the input feature distribution without introducing the redundant computation usually caused by parallel multi-branch structures. To alleviate the loss of small-object details in deep layers, a Feature Decomposition and Reconstruction module, namely FDR, was introduced after the P5 feature layer. The deep feature was divided into a structure branch and a detail branch. The structure branch was upsampled by bilinear interpolation to preserve global semantic information, such as leaf shape, lesion distribution, and large disease regions. The detail branch used a lightweight pixel-shuffle reconstruction operation to enhance local responses related to lesion edges, insect contours, and spore textures. The reconstructed feature was then fused with the corresponding P4 feature in the neck network, allowing the model to reuse deep semantic information while selectively strengthening detail-sensitive responses. For the regression loss, a Scale-Aware Gradient Boosting Loss, termed SAGB-Loss, was constructed to increase the training contribution of small targets. The loss combined feature-level weighting and target-area-aware weighting. The feature-level term assigned larger weights to shallow layers that are more closely related to small-object detection, while the area-aware term used a continuous exponential function to smoothly enhance the regression gradients of small targets. Experiments were carried out on a field corn leaf image dataset containing 10 324 images and eight categories of disease and pest targets. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test subsets at a ratio of 6:2:2. [Results and Discussions] LiteFocus-Net achieved 74.97% mean Average Precision (mAP) at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.5, with 2.52 million parameters and 5.3 GFLOPs. Compared with the YOLOv11n baseline, the average precision for small objects (AP_s) increased from 28.1% to 32.77%, giving an improvement of 4.7 percentage points, while the computational cost decreased by 15.9 percent. Ablation experiments confirmed the contribution of each component. AKL-Block reduced the overall computational cost and improved small-target accuracy, FDR further enhanced detail-sensitive features from deep layers, and SAGB-Loss increased the regression contribution of small targets without causing an obvious decline in medium- and large-object detection. Comparisons with Inception-style and selective-kernel multi-scale modules showed that AKL-Block achieved a more favorable accuracy-complexity trade-off under lightweight deployment constraints. Comparisons with full-channel pixel-shuffle reconstruction also indicated that FDR provided a practical balance between detail recovery and additional computational cost. Deployment tests on RK3588 and Jetson Orin NX further showed that LiteFocus-Net maintained real-time inference capability after INT8 quantization, which indicated its potential for field inspection and agricultural edge intelligence applications. [Conclusions] The results suggest that LiteFocus-Net improves small-target detection of corn leaf diseases and pests without relying on a larger model scale. Future work will focus on expanding cross-region, cross-variety, and cross-growth-stage samples, and on exploring region-level dynamic kernel selection, video-based continuous detection, and weakly supervised annotation strategies to improve robustness in long-term field deployment.

Cite this article

ZHANG YiBo , MAO Bo , ZHANG Lei . LiteFocus-Net: A Three-Point Lightweight Enhancement Framework for Small-Target Detection of Corn Leaf Diseases and Pests[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2026 : 1 -21 . DOI: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202605017

References

[1] KALUNGA P, KUNDA D. Deep learning applications in maize disease detection: a systematic review of trends, gaps, and future research[J]. Zambia ICT Journal, 2025, 9(2): 31-37.
[2] GüLMEZ B. Advancements in maize disease detection: A comprehensive review of convolutional neural networks[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 183: 109222.
[3] FENG Z R, SHI R M, JIANG Y H, et al. SPD-YOLO: A method for detecting maize disease pests using improved YOLOv7[J]. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, 84(2): 3559-3575.
[4] MENG Y, ZHAN J W, LI K S, et al. A rapid and precise algorithm for maize leaf disease detection based on YOLO MSM[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 6016.
[5] NAKATUMBA-NABENDE J, MURINDANYI S. Deep learning models for enhanced in-field maize leaf disease diagnosis[J]. Machine Learning with Applications, 2025, 20: 100673.
[6] KHAN Z, SHEN Y, LIU H. ObjectDetection in agriculture: A comprehensive review of methods, applications, challenges, and future directions[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(13): 1351.
[7] SAPKOTA R, FLORES-CALERO M, QURESHI R, et al. YOLO advances to its genesis: A decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2025, 58(9): 274.
[8] WANG C Y, YEH I H, LIAO H Y M. YOLOv9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2024. Cham, Germany: Springer, 2025: 1-21.
[9] WANG A, CHEN H, LIU L H, et al. YOLOv10: real-time end-to-end object detection[C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS), 2024: 107984-108011.
[10] KHANAM R, HUSSAIN M. YOLOv11: an overview of the key architectural enhancements[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2024.
[11] ZHANG X Y, ZHOU X Y, LIN M X, et al. ShuffleNet: an extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2018: 6848-6856.
[12] HOWARD A G, ZHU M L, CHEN B, et al. MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2017.
[13] HAN K, WANG Y H, TIAN Q, et al. GhostNet: more features from cheap operations[C]// 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2020: 1577-1586.
[14] LIN T Y, DOLLAR P, GIRSHICK R, et al. Feature pyramid networks for object detection[C]// 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2017: 936-944.
[15] LIU S, QI L, QIN H F, et al. Path aggregation network for instance segmentation[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2018: 8759-8768.
[16] TAN M X, PANG R M, LE Q V. EfficientDet: scalable and efficient object detection[C]// 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2020: 10778-10787.
[17] LIN T Y, GOYAL P, GIRSHICK R, et al. Focal loss for dense object detection[C]// 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2017: 2999-3007.
[18] ZHANG H, ZHANG S J. Focaler-IoU: more focused intersection over union loss[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2024.
[19] ZHANG Y F, REN W Q, ZHANG Z, et al. Focal and efficient IOU loss for accurate bounding box regression[J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 506: 146-157.
[20] TONG Z J, CHEN Y H, XU Z W, et al. Wise-IoU: bounding box regression loss with dynamic focusing mechanism[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2023.
[21] ZHANG W, HU H, SUN Y Q, et al. AgriPest-YOLO: A lightweight detection network for dense small agricultural pests under complex field backgrounds[J]. Agriculture Communications, 2022, 1(1): 100017.
[22] ZHENG Y, ZHENG W H, DU X. A lightweight rice pest detection algorithm based on improved YOLOv8[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 29888.
[23] HUANG Y K, ZHONG Y L, ZHONG D C, et al. Pepper-YOLO: An lightweight model for green pepper detection and picking point localization in complex environments[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1508258.
[24] LU Y Z, LIU P F, TAN C. MA-YOLO: A pest target detection algorithm with multi-scale fusion and attention mechanism[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(7): 1549.
[25] CEN X Y, LU S L, QIAN T T. YOLO-LCE: A lightweight YOLOv8 model for agricultural pest detection[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(9): 2022.
[26] YANG H, SHENG S Y, JIANG F, et al. YOLO-SDW: A method for detecting infection in corn leaves[J]. Energy Reports, 2024, 12: 6102-6111.
[27] JANG E, GU S X, POOLE B. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax[PP/OL]. arXiv: 1611.01144, 2017.
[28] HU J, SHEN L, SUN G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2018: 7132-7141.
[29] SHI W Z, CABALLERO J, HUSZAR F, et al. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network[C]// 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1874-1883.
[30] ZHAO Y A, LV W Y, XU S L, et al. DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection[C]// 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2024: 16965-16974.
[31] CAI H, LI J Y, HU M Y, et al. EfficientViT: Lightweight multi-scale attention for high-resolution dense prediction[C]// 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2023: 17256-17267.
[32] WANG C C, HE W, NIE Y, et al. Gold-YOLO: efficient object detector via gather-and-distribute mechanism[C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS), 2023: 51094-51112.
[33] CHEN Y M, YUAN X B, WANG J B, et al. YOLO-MS: Rethinking multi-scale representation learning for real-time object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025, 47(6): 4240-4252.
[34] XU X Z, JIANG Y Q, CHEN W H, et al. DAMO-YOLO: A report on real-time object detection design[PP/OL]. arXiv:, 2022.
[35] LYU C Q, ZHANG W W, HUANG H A, et al. RTMDet: An empirical study of designing real-time object detectors[PP/OL]. arXiv.2212.07784, 2022.
[36] MEHTA S, RASTEGARI M. MobileViT: Light-weight, general-purpose, and mobile-friendly vision transformer[PP/OL] arXiv: , 2021.
[37] ZHANG J N, LI X T, LI J, et al. Rethinking mobile block for efficient attention-based models[C]// 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2023: 1389-1400.
[38] CHEN J R, KAO S H, HE H, et al. Run, don't walk: chasing higher FLOPS for faster neural networks[C]// 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2023: 12021-12031.
Outlines

/