Smart Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 82-98.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202211004
收稿日期:
2022-11-11
出版日期:
2023-03-30
基金资助:
作者简介:
桂泽春,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业风险管理。E-mail:guizechun2022@163.com
通信作者:
赵思健,博士,研究员,研究方向为农业风险管理及保险。E-mail:zhaosijian@caas.cnReceived:
2022-11-11
Online:
2023-03-30
corresponding author:
ZHAO Sijian, E-mail:zhaosijian@caas.cn
About author:
GUI Zechun, E-mail:guizechun2022@163.com
Supported by:
摘要:
农业是关系国计民生的基础产业,但同时又是弱质产业,传统农业风险管理研究方法中存在非线性信息挖掘不足、精确度不高和鲁棒性差等问题。人工智能(Artificial Intelligence,AI)拥有基于大数据的强非线性拟合、端到端建模和特征自学习等强大功能可很好地解决上述问题。本文首先分析了AI在农业脆弱性评估、农业风险预测,以及农业损害评估三大方面的研究进展,得出如下结论:1. AI在农业脆弱性评估中的特征重要性评估缺乏科学有效的验证指标,且应用方式导致无法比较多个模型之间的优劣,建议采用主客观法进行评价;2. 在风险预测中,发现随着预测时间的增加,机器学习模型的预测能力往往会下降,过拟合问题是风险预测中的常见问题,且目前研究针对图数据空间信息的挖掘还较少;3. 农业生产环境复杂,应用场景多变是影响损害评估准确性的重要因素,提升深度学习模型的特征提取能力和鲁棒性是未来技术发展需要克服的重点和难点问题。然后,针对AI应用过程中存在的性能提升问题和小样本问题提出了相应的解决方案。对于性能提升问题,根据使用者对人工智能的熟悉程度,可分别采用多种模型比较法、模型组合法和神经网络结构优化法以提升模型的性能表现;对于小样本的问题,往往可以将数据增强、生成对抗网络和迁移学习相结合,以增强模型的鲁棒性和提高模型识别的准确性。最后,对AI在农业风险管理中的应用进行了展望。未来可以考虑将人工智能引入农业脆弱性曲线的构建;针对农业产业链的上下游关系和与农业相关的行业关系,更多地应用图神经网络对农业价格风险预测进一步深入研究;损害评估建模过程中可以更多地引入评估目标相关领域的专业知识以增强对目标的特征学习,对小样本数据进行增广也是未来研究的重点内容。
中图分类号:
桂泽春, 赵思健. 人工智能在农业风险管理中的应用研究综述[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(1): 82-98.
GUI Zechun, ZHAO Sijian. Research Application of Artificial Intelligence in Agricultural Risk Management: A Review[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023, 5(1): 82-98.
1 | BENAMI E, JIN Z N, CARTER M R, et al. Uniting remote sensing, crop modelling and economics for agricultural risk management[J]. Nature reviews earth & environment, 2021, 2(2): 140-159. |
2 | 赵思健, 张峭. 东北三省农作物洪涝时空风险评估[J]. 灾害学, 2013, 28(3): 54-60. |
ZHAO S J, ZHANG Q. Spatial-temporal risk assessment of crops caused by flood in the three northeastern provinces of China[J]. Journal of catastrophology, 2013, 28(3): 54-60. | |
3 | CHEN W, JIANG Y. Application of Markov Model-Based IoT in Agricultural Insurance and Risk Management[J]. Mobile information systems, 2021, 2021: 1-8. |
4 | WANG C L, GAO Y W, AZIZ A, et al. Agricultural disaster risk management and capability assessment using big data analytics[J]. Big data, 2022, 10(3): 246-261. |
5 | 刘学文. 中国农业风险管理研究——基于完善农业风险管理体系的视角[D]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2014. |
LIU X W. The analysis on agriculture's risk management in China— From the perspective of improving the agriculture's risk management system[D]. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 2014. | |
6 | GHAFFARIAN S, VAN DER VOORT M, VALENTE J, et al. Machine learning-based farm risk management: A systematic mapping review[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 192: ID 106631. |
7 | 张峭, 王克, 汪必旺, 等. 农业风险综合管理: 一个理论框架[J]. 农业展望, 2016, 12(3): 59-65. |
ZHANG Q, WANG K, WANG B W, et al. Integrated risk management in agriculture: A theoretical framework[J]. Agricultural outlook, 2016, 12(3): 59-65. | |
8 | 别得进, 朱秀芳, 赵安周, 等. 农业旱灾脆弱性研究综述[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 51(S1): 62-69. |
BIE D J, ZHU X F, ZHAO A Z, et al. Assessment of agricultural drought vulnerability: A review[J]. Journal of Beijing normal university (natural science), 2015, 51(S1): 62-69. | |
9 | PARKER L, BOURGOIN C, MARTINEZ-VALLE A, et al. Vulnerability of the agricultural sector to climate change: The development of a pan-tropical Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment to inform sub-national decision making[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(3): ID e0213641. |
10 | PATHAK T, MASKEY M, DAHLBERG J, et al. Climate change trends and impacts on California agriculture: A detailed review[J]. Agronomy, 2018, 8(3): ID 25. |
11 | YANG W, XU K, LIAN J, et al. Integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach based on TOPSIS and Shannon entropy methods[J]. Ecological indicators, 2018, 89: 269-280. |
12 | 谢家智, 车四方, 林涌. 农业旱灾风险管理脆弱性评价及驱动因素分析[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43(3): 43-53, 189. |
XIE J Z, CHE S F, LIN Y. Vulnerability assessment and the driving force in the management of agricultural drought hazard[J]. Journal of southwest university (social sciences edition), 2017, 43(3): 43-53, 189. | |
13 | HANADÉ HOUMMA I, MANSOURI LEL, GADAL S, et al. Modelling agricultural drought: A review of latest advances in big data technologies[J]. Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 2022, 13(1): 2737-2776. |
14 | TAMAGNO S, EAGLE A J, MCLELLAN E L, et al. Predicting nitrate leaching loss in temperate rainfed cereal crops: Relative importance of management and environmental drivers[J]. Environmental research Letters, 2022, 17(6): ID 064043. |
15 | ABDALLAH EBEN, GRATI R, BOUKADI K. A machine learning-based approach for smart agriculture via stacking-based ensemble learning and feature selection methods[C]// 2022 18th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 1-8. |
16 | LI Y, GONG S Y, ZHANG Z R, et al. Vulnerability evaluation of rainstorm disaster based on ESA conceptual framework: A case study of Liaoning province, China[J]. Sustainable cities and society, 2021, 64: ID 102540. |
17 | DENG X Y, WANG G Q, YAN H F, et al. Spatial–temporal pattern and influencing factors of drought impacts on agriculture in China[J]. Frontiers in environmental science, 2022, 10: ID 820615. |
18 | KINNUNEN P, HEINO M, SANDSTRÖM V, et al. Crop yield loss risk is modulated by anthropogenic factors[J]. Earth's future, 2022, 10(9): ID e2021EF002420. |
19 | 孙鹏, 刘果镍, 梁媛媛, 等. 基于机器学习算法的安徽省农业旱灾风险动态评估[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2022, 53(5): 22-35. |
SUN P, LIU G N, LIANG Y Y, et al. Machine learning algorithm-based dynamic assessment of agricultural drought dangerousness in Anhui province[J]. Water resources and hydropower engineering, 2022, 53(5): 22-35. | |
20 | SAMUEL J, RAO C A R, RAJU B M K, et al. Assessing the impact of climate resilient technologies in minimizing drought impacts on farm incomes in drylands[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 14(1): ID 382. |
21 | 刘伟, 徐洁, 黎洁. 陕南易地扶贫搬迁农户生计脆弱性研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(10): 2002-2014. |
LIU W, XU J, LI J. Livelihood vulnerability of rural households under poverty alleviation relocation in southern Shaanxi, China[J]. Resources science, 2018, 40(10): 2002-2014. | |
22 | MELKETO T, SCHMIDT M, BONATTI M, et al. Determinants of pastoral household resilience to food insecurity in a far region, northeast Ethiopia[J]. Journal of arid environments, 2021, 188: ID 104454. |
23 | 和月月, 周常春. 贫困地区农户生计脆弱性评价及影响因素分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(19): 70-74. |
HE Y Y, ZHOU C C. Vulnerability evaluation and influencing factors analysis of farmers' livelihood in poverty-stricken areas[J]. Statistics & decision, 2020, 36(19): 70-74. | |
24 | SAHA T K, PAL S. Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee River Basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches[J]. Ecological indicators, 2019, 98: 251-265. |
25 | ROY P, PAL S C, CHAKRABORTTY R, et al. Climate change and groundwater overdraft impacts on agricultural drought in India: Vulnerability assessment, food security measures and policy recommendation[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 849: ID 157850. |
26 | 张帅, 董会忠, 曾文霞. 土地生态系统脆弱性时空演化特征及影响因素——以黄河三角洲高效生态经济区为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(4): 1696-1704. |
ZHANG S, DONG H Z, ZENG W X. The time-space evolution characteristics of the vulnerability of land ecosystems and influencing factors: A case study of the Yellow River Delta Efficiency Eco-economic Zone[J]. China environmental science, 2019, 39(4): 1696-1704. | |
27 | SAHA S, KUNDU B, SAHA A, et al. Manifesting deep learning algorithms for developing drought vulnerability index in monsoon climate dominant region of West Bengal, India[J]. Theoretical and applied climatology, 2023, 151(1): 891-913. |
28 | 苏芳, 李景坤, 许韶华. 基于BP神经网络的农户生计风险评价模型[J]. 冰川冻土, 2017, 39(6): 1381-1390. |
SU F, LI J K, XU S H. An assessment model of farmer livelihood risk based on BP neural network[J]. Journal of glaciology and geocryology, 2017, 39(6): 1381-1390. | |
29 | KIRASICH K, SMITH T, SADLER B. Random forest vs logistic regression: Binary classification for heterogeneous datasets[J]. SMU Data science review, 2018, 1(3): ID 9. |
30 | FUNG K F, HUANG Y F, KOO C H, et al. Improved SVR machine learning models for agricultural drought prediction at downstream of Langat River Basin, Malaysia[J]. Journal of water and climate change, 2020, 11(4): 1383-1398. |
31 | SUTANTO S J, VAN DER WEERT M, WANDERS N, et al. Moving from drought hazard to impact forecasts[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1): 1-7. |
32 | 李航. 统计学习方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2012. |
LI H. Statistical learning method[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2012. | |
33 | VAN KLOMPENBURG T, KASSAHUN A, CATAL C. Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020, 177: ID 105709. |
34 | HE L L, FANG W T, ZHAO G N, et al. Fruit yield prediction and estimation in orchards: A state-of-the-art comprehensive review for both direct and indirect methods[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 195: ID 106812. |
35 | PRODHAN F A, ZHANG J H, HASAN S S, et al. A review of machine learning methods for drought hazard monitoring and forecasting: Current research trends, challenges, and future research directions[J]. Environmental modelling & software, 2022, 149: ID 105327. |
36 | DOMINGUES T, BRANDÃO T, FERREIRA J C. Machine learning for detection and prediction of crop diseases and pests: A comprehensive survey[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(9): ID 1350. |
37 | RADOČAJ D, JURIŠIĆ M. GIS-based cropland suitability prediction using machine learning: A novel approach to sustainable agricultural production[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(9): ID 2210. |
38 | ZOUNEMAT-KERMANI M, BATELAAN O, FADAEE M, et al. Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2021, 598: ID 126266. |
39 | PEI F S, LI X, LIU X P, et al. Assessing the impacts of droughts on net primary productivity in China[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2013, 114: 362-371. |
40 | HA T V, HUTH J, BACHOFER F, et al. A review of earth observation-based drought studies in southeast Asia[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(15): ID 3763. |
41 | PRODHAN F A, ZHANG J H, YAO F M, et al. Deep learning for monitoring agricultural drought in South Asia using remote sensing data[J]. Remote sensing, 2021, 13(9): ID 1715. |
42 | PARK S, SEO E, KANG D, et al. Prediction ofdrought on pentad scale using remote sensing data and MJO index through random forest over East Asia[J]. Remote sensing, 2018, 10(11): ID 1811. |
43 | ZHANG Q, SHI R, SINGH V P, et al. Droughts across China: Drought factors, prediction and impacts[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 803: ID 150018. |
44 | LI J, WANG Z L, WU X S, et al. Robust meteorological drought prediction using antecedent SST fluctuations and machine learning[J]. Water resources research, 2021, 57(8): ID e2020WR029413. |
45 | 张建海, 张棋, 许德合, 等. ARIMA-LSTM组合模型在基于SPI干旱预测中的应用——以青海省为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 1004-1013. |
ZHANG J H, ZHANG Q, XU D H, et al. Application of a combined ARIMA-LSTM model based on SPI for the forecast of drought: A case study in Qinghai province[J]. Arid land geography, 2020, 43(4): 1004-1013. | |
46 | WANG Y, HONG H Y, CHEN W, et al. Flood susceptibility mapping in Dingnan County (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2019, 247: 712-729. |
47 | VENKATESAN E, MAHINDRAKAR A B. Forecasting floods using extreme gradient boosting: A new approach[J]. International journal of civil engineering and technology, 2019, 10(2): 1336-1346. |
48 | MIRZAEI S, VAFAKHAH M, PRADHAN B, et al. Flood susceptibility assessment using extreme gradient boosting (EGB), Iran[J]. Earth science informatics, 2021, 14(1): 51-67. |
49 | TABBUSSUM R, DAR A Q. Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms—Artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2021, 28(20): 25265-25282. |
50 | ZHANG K, NIU J F, LI X, et al. Comparison of artificial intelligence flood forecasting models in China's semi-arid and semi-humid regions[J]. Water resources protection, 2021, 37(1): 28-35. |
51 | EBRAHIMI M, MOHAMMADI-DEHCHESHMEH M, EBRAHIMIE E, et al. Comprehensive analysis of machine learning models for prediction of sub-clinical mastitis: Deep learning and Gradient-boosted trees outperform other models[J]. Computers in biology and medicine, 2019, 114: ID 103456. |
52 | TEIXEIRA V A, LANA A M Q, BRESOLIN T, et al. Using rumination and activity data for early detection of anaplasmosis disease in dairy heifer calves[J]. Journal of dairy science, 2022, 105(5): 4421-4433. |
53 | CASELLA E, CANTOR M C, SILVESTRI S, et al. Cost-aware inference of bovine respiratory disease in calves using precision livestock technology[C]// 2022 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems(DCOSS). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 109-116. |
54 | AHMED G, MALICK R A S, AKHUNZADA A, et al. An approach towards IoT-based predictive service for early detection of diseases in poultry chickens[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(23): ID 13396. |
55 | 陈英义, 程倩倩, 方晓敏, 等. 主成分分析和长短时记忆神经网络预测水产养殖水体溶解氧[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17): 183-191. |
CHEN Y Y, CHENG Q Q, FANG X M, et al. Principal component analysis and long short-term memory neural network for predicting dissolved oxygen in water for aquaculture[J]. Transactions of the Chinese society of agricultural engineering, 2018, 34(17): 183-191. | |
56 | 郝玉莹, 赵林, 孙同, 等. 基于RF-LSTM的地表水体水质预测[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2021, 32(6): 41-48. |
HAO Y Y, ZHAO L, SUN T, et al. Surface water quality prediction based on RF-LSTM[J]. Journal of water resources and water engineering, 2021, 32(6): 41-48. | |
57 | JHA G, SINHA K. Agricultural price forecasting using neural network model: An innovative information delivery system[J]. Agricultural economics research review, 2013, 26(347-2016-17087): 229-239. |
58 | PAUL R K, YEASIN M, KUMAR P, et al. Machine learning techniques for forecasting agricultural prices: A case of brinjal in Odisha, India[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(7): ID e0270553. |
59 | ZHANG D B, CHEN S Y, LING L W, et al. Forecasting agricultural commodity prices using model selection framework with time series features and forecast horizons[J]. IEEE access, 2020, 8: 28197-28209. |
60 | 吕逸鹏, 林旭东. 基于分类模型的生猪价格预测[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2020, 56(12): 215-219. |
LYU Y P, LIN X D. Pork price prediction based on classification model[J]. Chinese journal of animal science, 2020, 56(12): 215-219. | |
61 | 许钰林, 康孟珍, 王秀娟, 等. 基于深度学习的玉米和大豆期货价格智能预测[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(4): 156-163. |
XU Y L, KANG M Z, WANG X J, et al. Corn and soybean futures price intelligent forecasting based on deep learning[J]. Smart agriculture, 2022, 4(4): 156-163. | |
62 | WONGCHAI A, JENJETI D R, PRIYADARSINI A I, et al. Farm monitoring and disease prediction by classification based on deep learning architectures in sustainable agriculture[J]. Ecological modelling, 2022, 474: ID 110167. |
63 | XING L W, CUI N B, LIU C W, et al. Estimation of daily apple tree transpiration in the Loess Plateau region of China using deep learning models[J]. Agricultural water management, 2022, 273: ID 107889. |
64 | VENKATACHALAM K, TROJOVSKÝ P, PAMUCAR D, et al. DWFH: An improved data-driven deep weather forecasting hybrid model using Transductive Long Short Term Memory (T-LSTM)[J]. Expert systems with applications, 2023, 213: ID 119270. |
65 | WANG J A, SI H P, GAO Z, et al. Winter wheat yield prediction using an LSTM model from MODIS LAI products[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(10): ID 1707. |
66 | ZHANG L, CAI Y Y, HUANG H L, et al. A CNN-LSTM model for soil organic carbon content prediction with long time series of MODIS-based phenological variables[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(18): ID 4441. |
67 | LIU Y Q, ZHANG Q, SONG L H, et al. Attention-based recurrent neural networks for accurate short-term and long-term dissolved oxygen prediction[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2019, 165: ID 104964. |
68 | CELIK M F, ISIK M S, YUZUGULLU O, et al. Soil moisture prediction from remote sensing images coupled with climate, soil texture and topography via deep learning[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(21): ID 5584. |
69 | ZHUANG J Y, XU S W, LI G Q, et al. Intelligentdecision method of multi-agricultural commodity model based on machine learning[J]. International journal of pattern recognition and artificial intelligence, 2022, 36(8): ID 2251003. |
70 | 刘忠雨, 李彦霖, 周洋. 深入浅出图神经网络: GNN 原理解析[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2020. |
LIU Z Y, LI Y L, ZHOU Y. Learning graph neural network[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2020. | |
71 | ZHOU J, CUI G Q, HU S D, et al. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications[J]. AI open, 2020, 1: 57-81. |
72 | ZHOU Y, ZHENG H X, HUANG X, et al. Graph neural networks: Taxonomy, advances, and trends[J]. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology, 2022, 13(1): ID 15. |
73 | LACHAUD G, CONDE-CESPEDES P, TROCAN M. Mathematical expressiveness of graph neural networks[J]. Mathematics, 2022, 10(24): ID 4770. |
74 | LI P P, HAO H J, ZHANG Z, et al. A field study to estimate heavy metal concentrations in a soil-rice system: Application of graph neural networks[J]. Science of the total environment, 2022, 832: ID 155099. |
75 | ZENG H W, ZHU Q, DING Y L, et al. Graph neural networks with constraints of environmental consistency for landslide susceptibility evaluation[J]. International journal of geographical information science, 2022, 36(11): 2270-2295. |
76 | KIM R, SO C H, JEONG M, et al. Hats: A hierarchical graph attention network for stock movement prediction[J/OL]. arXiv:, 2019. |
77 | MAMAT N, OTHMAN M F, ABDOULGHAFOR R, et al. Advancedtechnology in agriculture industry by implementing image annotation technique and deep learning approach: A review[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(7): ID 1033. |
78 | ADI M, SINGH A K, REDDY A H, et al. An overview on plant disease detection algorithm using deep learning[C]// 2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2021: 305-309. |
79 | MAHESWARI P, RAJA P, APOLO-APOLO O E, et al. Intelligent fruit yield estimation for orchards using deep learning based semantic segmentation techniques-a review[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, 12: ID 684328. |
80 | QIN Q, HU X J. The application of attention mechanism in semantic image segmentation[C]// 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2020: 1573-1580. |
81 | JIANG B D, AN X Y, XU S F, et al. Intelligentimage semantic segmentation: A review through deep learning techniques for remote sensing image analysis[J]. Journal of the Indian society of remote sensing, 2022: 1-14. |
82 | PUNITHAVATHI R, DELPHIN CAROLINA RANI A, SUGHASHINI K R, et al. Computer vision and deep learning-enabled weed detection model for precision agriculture[J]. Computer systems science and engineering, 2023, 44(3): 2759-2774. |
83 | KHATTAK A, ASGHAR M U, BATOOL U, et al. Automatic detection of Citrus fruit and leaves diseases using deep neural network model[J]. IEEE access, 2021, 9: 112942-112954. |
84 | SINGH S, GUPTA I, GUPTA S, et al. Deep learning based automated detection of diseases from apple leaf images[J]. CMC-Computers, Materials & Continua, 2022, 71(1): 1849-1866. |
85 | MIRZAZADEH A, AZIZI A, ABBASPOUR-GILANDEH Y, et al. A novel technique for classifying bird damage to rapeseed plants based on a deep learning algorithm[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(11): ID 2364. |
86 | YANG W, YANG C, HAO Z Y, et al. Diagnosis of plant cold damage based on hyperspectral imaging and convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 118239-118248. |
87 | JIAO L, XIE C J, CHEN P, et al. Adaptive feature fusion pyramid network for multi-classes agricultural pest detection[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 195: ID 106827. |
88 | BI C G, HU N, ZOU Y Q, et al. Development of deep learning methodology for maize seed variety recognition based on improved swin transformer[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(8): ID 1843. |
89 | LYU M J, ZHOU G X, HE M F, et al. Maize leaf disease identification based on feature enhancement and DMS-robust alexnet[J]. IEEE access, 2020, 8: 57952-57966. |
90 | SAHU S, J A. Maize Plant Disease classification using optimized DenseNet121[C]// 2022 OITS International Conference on Information Technology (OCIT). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 1-6. |
91 | GEHLOT M, SAINI M L. Analysis of different CNN architectures for tomato leaf disease classification[C]// 2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2021: 1-6. |
92 | HAMIDISEPEHR A, MIRNEZAMI S V, WARD J K. Comparison of object detection methods for corn damage assessment using deep learning[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2020, 63(6): 1969-1980. |
93 | SHARMA P, BERWAL Y P S, GHAI W. Performance analysis of deep learning CNN models for disease detection in plants using image segmentation[J]. Information processing in agriculture, 2020, 7(4): 566-574. |
94 | 万军杰, 祁力钧, 卢中奥, 等. 基于迁移学习的GoogLeNet果园病虫害识别与分级[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(11): 209-221. |
WAN J J, QI L J, LU Z A, et al. Recognition and grading of diseases and pests in orchard by GoogLeNet based on Transfer Learning[J]. Journal of China agricultural university, 2021, 26(11): 209-221. | |
95 | CHEN J D, CHEN J X, ZHANG D F, et al. Using deep transfer learning for image-based plant disease identification[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2020, 173: ID 105393. |
96 | 周维, 牛永真, 王亚炜, 等. 基于改进的YOLOv4-GhostNet水稻病虫害识别方法[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(3): 685-695. |
ZHOU W, NIU Y Z, WANG Y W, et al. Rice pests and diseases identification method based on improved YOLOv4-GhostNet[J]. Jiangsu journal of agricultural sciences, 2022, 38(3): 685-695. | |
97 | REDDY B S, NEERAJA S. Plant leaf disease classification and damage detection system using deep learning models[J]. Multimedia tools and applications, 2022, 81(17): 24021-24040. |
98 | YUMANG A N, CHLOE M STA JUANA M, DILOY R L C. Detection and classification of defective fresh excelsa beans using mask R-CNN algorithm[C]// 2022 14th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 97-102. |
99 | KUMAR D, KUKREJA V. Image-based wheat mosaic virus detection with mask-RCNN model[C]// 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2022: 178-182. |
100 | DAS M, BAIS A. DeepVeg: Deep learning model for segmentation of weed, canola, and canola flea beetle damage[J]. IEEE access, 2021, 9: 119367-119380. |
101 | LOYANI L K, BRADSHAW K, MACHUVE D. Segmentation of Tuta absoluta's damage on tomato plants: A computer vision approach[J]. Applied artificial intelligence, 2021, 35(14): 1107-1127. |
102 | ZHANG J Z, CONG S J, ZHANG G, et al. Detecting pest-infested forest damage through multispectral satellite imagery and improved UNet+[J]. Sensors (basel, Switzerland), 2022, 22(19): ID 7440. |
103 | NASIRI A, OMID M, TAHERI-GARAVAND A, et al. Deep learning-based precision agriculture through weed recognition in sugar beet fields[J]. Sustainable computing: Informatics and systems, 2022, 35: ID 100759. |
104 | MEMON M S, KUMAR P, IQBAL R. Metadeep learn leaf disease identification model for cotton crop[J]. Computers, 2022, 11(7): 102. |
105 | LECUN Y, BOTTOU L, BENGIO Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11): 2278-2324. |
106 | KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2017, 60(6): 84-90. |
107 | 马岽奡, 唐娉, 赵理君, 等. 深度学习图像数据增广方法研究综述[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2021, 26(3): 487-502. |
MA D A, TANG P, ZHAO L J, et al. Review of data augmentation for image in deep learning[J]. Journal of image and graphics, 2021, 26(3): 487-502. | |
108 | ZHUANG F Z, QI Z Y, DUAN K Y, et al. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2021, 109(1): 43-76. |
109 | ZHANG L, NIE Q, JI H Y, et al. Hyperspectral imaging combined with generative adversarial network (GAN)-based data augmentation to identify haploid maize kernels[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis, 2022, 106: ID 104346. |
[1] | 郭旺, 杨雨森, 吴华瑞, 朱华吉, 缪祎晟, 顾静秋. 农业大模型:关键技术、应用分析与发展方向[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 1-13. |
[2] | 毛克彪, 张晨阳, 施建成, 王旭明, 郭中华, 李春树, 董立新, 吴门新, 孙瑞静, 武胜利, 姬大彬, 蒋玲梅, 赵天杰, 邱玉宝, 杜永明, 徐同仁. 基于人工智能的地球物理参数反演范式理论及判定条件[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(2): 161-171. |
[3] | 赵瑞雪, 杨晨雪, 郑建华, 李娇, 王剑. 农业智能知识服务研究现状及展望[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(4): 105-125. |
[4] | 杨亮, 熊本海, 王辉, 陈睿鹏, 赵一广. 家畜饲喂机器人研究进展与发展展望[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(2): 86-98. |
[5] | 耿闻轩, 赵俊晔, 阮继伟, 侯跃辉. 人工智能辅助种植策略对温室草莓生产调控效果对比研究[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(2): 183-193. |
[6] | 张宇, 赵春江, 林森, 郭文忠, 文朝武, 龙洁花. 基于Penman-Monteith模型和路径排序算法相结合的草莓灌溉方法与验证[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2021, 3(3): 116-128. |
[7] | 李道亮, 刘畅. 人工智能在水产养殖中研究应用分析与未来展望[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2020, 2(3): 1-20. |
[8] | 赵春江. 智慧农业发展现状及战略目标研究[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2019, 1(1): 1-7. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||