欢迎您访问《智慧农业(中英文)》官方网站! English

Smart Agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (6): 58-74.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202505022

• 专刊--遥感+AI 赋能农业农村现代化 • 上一篇    下一篇

南方丘陵山区耕地撂荒遥感监测综述

龙禹桥1, 孙晶2, 温艳茹2, 汪楚涯1, 董秀春1, 黄平1, 吴文斌2, 陈晋3, 丁明忠4()   

  1. 1. 四川省农业科学院遥感与数字农业研究所(成都农业遥感分中心),四川 成都 610066,中国
    2. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所/北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室,北京 100081,中国
    3. 北京师范大学 地理科学学部,北京,100875,中国
    4. 四川省农业科学院,四川 成都 610066,中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-22 出版日期:2025-11-30
  • 基金项目:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD2001105); 西藏自治区科技计划重点研发计划项目(XZ202201ZY0008N); 四川省财政自主创新专项(2022ZZCX031)
  • 作者简介:

    龙禹桥,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为农业土地资源遥感。E-mail:

  • 通信作者:
    丁明忠,博士,高级农艺师,研究方向为农业信息化。E-mail:

Remote Sensing Approaches for Cropland Abandonment Perception in Southern Hilly and Mountainous Areas of China: A Review

LONG Yuqiao1, SUN Jing2, WEN Yanru2, WANG Chuya1, DONG Xiuchun1, HUANG Ping1, WU Wenbin2, CHEN Jin3, DING Mingzhong4()   

  1. 1. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Agriculture (Chengdu Agricultural Remote Sensing Sub-center), Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China
    2. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Beijing 100081, China
    3. Faculty of Geography Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    4. Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China
  • Received:2025-05-22 Online:2025-11-30
  • Foundation items:National Key Research and Development Project of China(2022YFD2001105); Key Research and Development Project of the Tibet Autonomous Region Science and Technology Program(XZ202201ZY0008N); Sichuan Provincial Financial Independent Innovation Project(2022ZZCX031)
  • About author:

    LONG Yuqiao, E-mail:

  • Corresponding author:
    DING Mingzhong, E-mail:

摘要:

[目的/意义] 耕地撂荒是全球土地利用变化中的一个核心议题,其背后蕴含着粮食安全与生态恢复(如碳汇)之间复杂的权衡关系。在中国南方丘陵山区,破碎的地形与复杂的农业系统使得撂荒现象尤为普遍且监测困难。精准、高效地获取撂荒时空信息,对于制定兼顾粮食生产与生态服务的土地利用政策至关重要。本文旨在系统评述撂荒地遥感监测方法,梳理其技术演进脉络,并展望未来发展方向。 [进展] 本文系统回顾了相关文献,揭示出撂荒地遥感监测技术已展现出清晰的演进脉络。在监测范式层面,其已从早期基于多时相分类后比较的“状态对比”,发展为当前利用时间序列分割算法进行“过程追踪”的主流动态分析。在识别算法层面,则实现了从依赖特征工程的传统机器学习,向能够自动学习时空特征的深度学习模型的深化。然而,现有研究在方法论上仍存在共性问题,突出表现为地面验证样本的时空代表性偏差,以及由云覆盖、混合像元和物候差异导致的不确定性。 [结论/展望] 当前研究仍面临光学数据获取难、方法精细度不够、撂荒特征挖掘弱等挑战。未来的研究应致力于构建一个集成的、智能化的监测体系。具体发展方向包括:构建融合光学、合成孔径雷达(Synthetic Aperture Radar, SAR)等多模态信息的无缝、高分辨率数据立方体;建立基于分层抽样原则的地面验证与多目标校准网络;发展物候知识与深度学习耦合的精细识别模型,并向量化评估“撂荒强度”演进;推动遥感云计算平台从“数据仓库”向支撑多尺度、多模态分析的“智能生态系统”转型;最终实现从描述性制图向预测性过程模拟与风险评估的范式跃迁。

关键词: 耕地撂荒, 遥感监测, 可持续利用, 丘陵山区, 南方地区, 遥感信息

Abstract:

[Significance] Cropland abandonment in hilly and mountainous regions is a pronounced manifestation of land‐use marginalization, with profound implications for both regional food security and ecosystem service provision. In southern China, this issue is particularly acute due to a confluence of factors including early and rapid urbanization, rugged topographic relief, complex multi‐cropping systems, and substantial rural‐to‐urban labor migration, which have driven widespread abandonment of steep, fragmented terraces. This trend presents a profound dual dilemma: On one hand, the cessation of cultivation diminishes local grain production capacity, amplifies pressure on existing cropland, and threatens national food supplies; On the other hand, the secondary succession of spontaneous vegetation on these deserted parcels offers significant carbon sequestration potential and contributes to biodiversity recovery. Yet, accurately mapping these spatio-temporal patterns is severely hampered by persistent cloud cover and the landscape's complexity. This leaves decision-makers without the timely, high‐resolution maps needed to track abandonment dynamics, uncover their socioeconomic and environmental drivers, and craft land-use policies that holistically balance agricultural output, carbon storage, and landscape resilience. [Progress] Drawing from literature published since 2014, this paper systematically reviews remote sensing‐based methods for cropland abandonment, revealing a clear developmental trajectory. Methodologically, the approaches have evolved along two parallel paths. First, the monitoring paradigm has shifted from early "state comparison" methods, such as post-classification comparison of discrete multi-temporal images, to modern "process tracking" approaches. These leverage dense time series, utilizing phenology‐aware algorithms such as LandTrendr and BFAST to identify abrupt or gradual breaks in the vegetation trajectory, thus capturing the dynamics of abandonment and distinguishing it from short-term fallows. Second, the identification algorithm has progressed from traditional machine learning classifiers and object-based image analysis (OBIA), which depend on hand‐crafted features, towards sophisticated deep learning frameworks capable of automatically learning complex spatio-temporal signatures. Concurrently, data pre-processing techniques have advanced significantly, with harmonic analysis, Savitzky-Golay filtering, and the integration of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data now routinely applied to reconstruct continuous, high-quality time series. Furthermore, this review provides a critical synthesis of common methodological issues, focusing on the spatio-temporal representativeness bias in ground validation samples and the multiple sources of uncertainty stemming from cloud cover, mixed pixels, and phenological variability. [Conclusions and Prospects] Despite considerable advances, persistent challenges continue to limit operational monitoring. Looking forward, the field must evolve from descriptive mapping toward a truly predictive and decision‐ready framework. This transformation hinges on five interlinked frontiers. First, it requires forging the seamless integration of diverse data streams: Fusing optical imagery, radar backscatter, and terrain models within cloud computing environments to yield uninterrupted, high‐resolution time series that capture both abrupt and gradual land‐use changes. Second, it necessitates the establishment of an extensive, stratified ground‐truth network; by systematically sampling high-risk, transitional, and reference plots and collecting synchronized measurements, researchers can iteratively recalibrate classification models and improve their resilience across the region's landscape mosaic. Third, on the algorithmic frontier, hybrid approaches that embed expert‐defined phenological rules within deep learning architectures offer a promising path to robustly disentangle permanent abandonment from temporary fallows and to quantify a continuous "abandonment intensity". Fourth, the deployment of fully automated and reproducible processing pipelines on cloud platforms like Google Earth Engine will democratize access to near-real‐time monitoring and enhance reproducibility through open-source workflows. Finally, anchoring detection within dynamic simulation frameworks (e.g., agent‐based models) driven by historical trajectories and key drivers will allow for the projection of future abandonment of "hotspots". Layering these projections with multi‐criteria risk assessments will yield spatially explicit risk maps to guide precision interventions—such as targeted recultivation subsidies or ecological restoration efforts—enabling sustainable land stewardship that simultaneously safeguards food security and enhances ecosystem resilience.

Key words: cropland abandonment, remote sensing, sustainable utilization, hilly and mountainous areas, Southern China, remote sensing information

中图分类号: