Design and Test of Rotary Envelope Combing-Type Tobacco Leaf Harvesting Mechanism

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.SA202501020

Abstract

Abstract:

[Objective] China is a big tobacco producer in the world, where tobacco significantly contributes to the national economy. Among all production stages, the leaf harvesting process requires the most labor. Currently, tobacco leaf harvesting in China remains predominantly manual, characterized by low mechanization, high labor demand, a limited harvesting window, and high labor intensity. With the advancement of agricultural modernization, mechanized tobacco leaf harvesting has become increasingly essential. However, existing tobacco harvesters are oversized and cause substantial leaf damage, making them unsuitable for China's conditions. To address this, a rotary envelope combing-type harvesting mechanism is proposed to minimize leaf damage and loss during harvesting. [Methods] A tobacco plant model was developed based on morphological characteristics and assessed the mechanical properties of tobacco leaves using a digital push-pull force gauge to measure tensile and bending characteristics. Force measurements for leaf separation in various directions revealed minimal force requirements when separating leaves from top to bottom. Based on these findings, a rotary envelope comb-type harvesting mechanism was designed, featuring both a transmission mechanism and a picking wheel. During operation, the picking wheel rotates around the tobacco stem, employing inertial combing from top to bottom for efficient leaf separation. Analysis of interactions between the picking mechanism and tobacco leaves identified combing speed as the parameter with greatest impact on picking efficiency. The mechanism's structural parameters affecting the picking wheel's movement trajectory were examined, and an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm was applied using MATLAB to refine these parameters. Additionally, Abaqus finite element simulation software was utilized to optimize the wheel structure's mechanical combing process. Dynamic simulation tests using Adams software modeled the mechanism's process of enveloping the tobacco stem and separating leaves, validating suction efficiency and determining optimal envelope range and speed parameters at various traveling speeds. To evaluate the picking effect and effectiveness of the tobacco leaf picking mechanism designed in this study, a field experiment was conducted in Sanxiang town, Yiyang county, Henan province. The performance of the harvesting mechanism was analyzed based on two critical evaluation criteria: the rate of tobacco leaf damage and the leakage rate. [Results and Discussions] By optimizing the mechanism's structural parameters using MATLAB, horizontal movement was reduced by 50.66%, and the movement trajectory was aligned vertically with the tobacco leaves, significantly reducing the risk of collision during the picking process. Finite element analysis identified the diameter of the picking rod as the key structural parameter influencing picking performance. Following extensive simulations, the optimal picking rod diameter was determined to be 15 mm, offering an ideal balance between structural strength and functional performance. The optimal envelope circle diameter for the mechanism was established at 70 mm. Aluminum alloy was selected as the material for the picking rod due to its lightweight nature, high strength-to-weight ratio, and excellent corrosion resistance. Dynamics analysis further revealed that the combing speed should not exceed 2.5 m/s to minimize leaf damage. The ideal rotational speed range for the picking mechanism was determined to be between 120 and 210 r/min, balancing operational efficiency with leaf preservation. These findings provide crucial guidance for refining the design and enhancing the practical performance of the picking mechanism. Field tests confirmed that the mechanism significantly improved operational performance, achieving a leakage rate below 7% and a damage rate below 10%, meeting the requirements for efficient tobacco picking. It was observed that excessive leaf leakage primarily occurred when leaves were steeply inclined, which hindered effective stem envelopment by the harvesting mechanism. Consequently, the mechanism proved particularly effective for picking centrally positioned leaves, while drooping leaves resulted in higher leakage and damage rates. The primary cause of leaf damage was found to be mechanical contact between the harvesting mechanism and the leaves during operation. Notably, while increasing striking speed reduced leakage, it simultaneously led to a higher damage rate. Compared to the existing harvesting mechanism, this newly developed mechanism is more compact and supports layered leaf picking, making it especially well-suited for integration into small- and medium-sized harvesting machinery. [Conclusions] This study presents an effective and practical solution for tobacco leaf harvesting mechanization, specifically addressing the critical challenges of leaf damage and leakage. The proposed solution not only improves harvesting quality but also features a significantly simplified mechanical structure. By combining innovative technology with optimized design, this approach minimizes impact on delicate leaves, reduces leakage, and ensures higher yields with minimal human intervention. Analysis and testing demonstrate this mechanized solution's potential to significantly reduce production losses, offering both economic and operational benefits for the tobacco industry.

Key words: tobacco leaf harvest, combing harvest, harvest loss, mechanism design, rotary envelope combing-type mechanism

CLC Number:

S225.99

WANG Xiaohan, RAN Yunliang, GE Chao, GUO Ting, LIU Yihao, CHEN Du, WANG Shumao. Design and Test of Rotary Envelope Combing-Type Tobacco Leaf Harvesting Mechanism[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(3): 210-223.

Figures/Tables 28

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Fig.3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Table 3

Fig. 11

Fig.12

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 13

Table 6

Orthogonal experiment results and range analysis of picking wheel parameters

序号	采收杆直径A/mm	包络圆直径B/mm	材料密度 C/（kg/mm³）	空列D	最大应力/MPa
最优组合	$A 1 B 1 C 1$			—	—
1	15	70	2.74×10^-6	1	0.457
2	15	80	4.43×10^-6	2	0.473
3	15	90	8.96×10^-6	3	0.464
4	10	70	4.43×10^-6	3	0.505
5	10	80	8.96×10^-6	1	0.529
6	10	90	2.74×10^-6	2	0.511
7	5	70	8.96×10^-6	2	0.638
8	5	80	2.74×10^-6	3	0.612
9	5	90	4.43×10^-6	1	0.639
$k 1 j$ 平均响应值	0.465	0.533	0.527	—	—
$k 2 j$ 平均响应值	0.515	0.538	0.539	—	—
$k 3 j$ 平均响应值	0.630	0.538	0.544	—	—
$R j$ 极差	0.165	0.005	0.017	—	—
因子主次	1	3	2	—	—

Table 6

Table 7

Fig.14

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Fig. 17

Fig. 18

Fig. 19

Table 8

Fig. 20

References 31

[1]	余泳昌, 魏富德, 秦伟桦, 等. 烟草收获机技术发展概述[J]. 农机化研究, 2016, 38(2): 255-262.
	YU Y C, WEI F D, QIN W H, et al. Technology development of tobacco harvester[J]. Journal of agricultural mechanization research, 2016, 38(2): 255-262.
[2]	RAJA B, VAISHNAVI P, KAVITHA D. Green tobacco sickness among tobacco harvesters: A review of the literature[J]. International journal of community dentistry, 2021, 9(2): 36-40.
[3]	刘从, 李军政, 王海毕, 等. 烟叶机械采收发展现状及对策分析[J]. 南方农机, 2024, 55(10): 24-28, 32.
[4]	谭绍辉, 孙超然, 李军政, 等. 南方丘陵地区烟叶机械化收获研究现状及对策研究[J]. 南方农机, 2023, 54(14): 33-36.
[5]	周铭颖, 江智敏, 丁建冰, 等. 延迟采收对稻茬烤烟上部叶物理性状的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2022, 36(2): 143-147, 159.
	ZHOU M Y, JIANG Z M, DING J B, et al. Effect of delayed harvest on physical properties of upper flue-cured tobacco under tobacco-rice rotation system[J]. Crop research, 2022, 36(2): 143-147, 159.
[6]	ZISKA L H, PARKS R M. Recent and projected changes in global climate may increase nicotine absorption and the risk of green tobacco sickness[J]. Communications medicine, 2024, 4(1): ID 158.
[7]	COX J R. Tobacco harvester: US19520286274[P]. 1953-04-21.
[8]	BALTHES G E. Tobacco harvester: US4192124[P]. 1980-03-11.
[9]	ROSENKOETTER R G. Defoliating tobacco harvester: US5293733[P]. 1994-03-15.
[10]	于洁, 褚金奎, 吴中心, 等. 全自动烟叶采收机方案设计[J]. 农机化研究, 2019, 41(4): 70-74.
	YU J, CHU J K, WU Z X, et al. Scheme design of automatic tobacco harvester[J]. Journal of agricultural mechanization research, 2019, 41(4): 70-74.
[11]	李阳, 褚金奎, 于洁. 烟草收获机采摘机构对烟叶采收效果影响的研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2022, 44(12): 170-174, 181.
	LI Y, CHU J K, YU J. Study on the effect of tobacco harvester picking mechanism on tobacco harvesting results[J]. Journal of agricultural mechanization research, 2022, 44(12): 170-174, 181.
[12]	王昱, 张文杭, 曾山, 等. 一种低损柔性采摘刀及烟叶采收方法: CN117678421A[P]. 2024-03-12.
[13]	陶彦清, 程永军. 一种烟叶采收用离散型万向刮叶刀: CN218831350U[P]. 2023-04-11.
[14]	齐龙, 田玉渊, 王志琪, 等. 烟叶采收装置及采收方法: CN113261426A[P]. 2021-08-17.
[15]	王秀山, 张合虎, 姜国强, 等. 一种带有智能仿生采摘手的烟草收获机: CN109328638B[P]. 2024-02-13.
[16]	孙福山, 刘自畅, 杜兴华, 等. 一种小型龙门履带式烟草采收机:CN115119617B[P]. 2023-06-02.
[17]	丁永前, 徐志刚, 张洪达, 等. 一种烟叶自动分层定量采收方法: CN202110524868.1[P]. 2022-04-12.
[18]	SUN C R, TAN S H, SUN S L, et al. Design and test of the key components for a combing-type tobacco harvester[J]. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering, 2024, 17(1): 145-153.
[19]	WANG J, SHAN C L, GOU F Q, et al. A review of key technologies and intelligent applications in soybean mechanized harvesting: Chinese and international perspectives[J]. Journal of biosystems engineering, 2025, 50(1): 79-104.
[20]	赵祖松颖, 张卫鹏, 王刚, 等. 基于可拓学原理的烟草田间作业机械评价研究——以烟草田间起垄机械为例[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2017, 23(2): 106-116.
	ZHAO Z S Y, ZHANG W P, WANG G, et al. Evaluation of tobacco farming machinery based on extenics: taking ridging machine as an example[J]. Acta tabacaria sinica, 2017, 23(2): 106-116.
[21]	LI Y, HE Y S, ZHANG K, et al. Design and performance evaluation of a self-propelled mugwort harvester for hilly and mountainous regions[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(1): ID 111.
[22]	PAPUSHA S K, PAPUSHA V K, PESTRYAKOVA Y A. Theoretical research of process of separating tobacco leaf from stem[J]. E3S web of conferences, 2019, 126: ID 00027.
[23]	YANG D J, JIANG L H. Design and research of large ginkgo biloba leaf picker [J]. Journal of physics: conference series, 2021, 1815(1): 12-39.
[24]	刘磊, 吴腾, 孔凡婷, 等. 辊刷式蓖麻收获机采摘机构优化设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(8): 19-29.
	LIU L, WU T, KONG F T, et al. Optimized design and experiment of the picking mechanism for brush-roller Castor harvesters[J]. Transactions of the Chinese society of agricultural engineering, 2021, 37(8): 19-29.
[25]	陈龙. 自走式蔬菜移栽机栽植装置优化设计与试验[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2024.
	CHEN L. Optimal design and experiment of planting device of self-propelled vegetable transplanter[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2024.
[26]	LIU H, ZHANG X W, TU L P. A modified particle swarm optimization using adaptive strategy[J]. Expert systems with applications, 2020, 152: ID 113353.
[27]	SUN S M, YU P, XING J W, et al. Multi-objective collaborative optimization of active distribution network operation based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Scientific reports, 2025, 15(1): ID 8999.
[28]	ADUTWUM A A, HAN F, JEREMIAH K O, et al. An improved multi-leader comprehensive learning particle swarm optimisation based on gravitational search algorithm[J]. Connection science, 2021, 33 (4): 803-834.
[29]	TIAN Y Y, ZENG Z W, GONG H, et al. Simulation of tensile behavior of tobacco leaf using the discrete element method (DEM)[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2023, 205: ID 107570.
[30]	仝振伟, 张秀丽, 邹彩虹, 等. 中部烟叶主脉的力学特性试验[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(21): 270-272, 281.
	TONG Z W, ZHANG X L, ZOU C H, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of main veins of middle tobacco leaves[J]. Jiangsu agricultural sciences, 2019, 47(21): 270-272, 281.
[31]	WANG S Y, HU Z C, CHEN Y Q, et al. Integration of agricultural machinery and agronomy for mechanised peanut production using the vine for animal feed[J]. Biosystems engineering, 2022, 219: 135-152.

品种	高度/m			烟杆直径/mm			叶片数/片			最低叶片高度/mm			冠层直径/m
品种	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差
平均值	1.13			35.6			18			174			1.1
云烟87（福建）	1.00~1.20	1.08	0.08	30.1~36.0	32.8	1.87	16~18	17	1.00	110~180	159	24.70	0.9~1.2	1.1	0.09
云烟87（云南）	1.20~1.30	1.27	0.05	30.4~39.2	35.9	1.81	18~20	19	1.86	150~200	177	18.63	0.9~1.2	1.1	0.14
K326（云南）	1.00~1.10	1.08	0.03	35.1~45.4	39.9	2.08	18~22	20	1.67	180~230	198	18.34	0.9~1.2	1.1	0.10

品种	叶长/mm			叶宽/mm			叶柄直径/mm						叶倾角/°			叶厚/mm			叶间距/mm
	叶长/mm			叶宽/mm			横向			纵向			叶倾角/°			叶厚/mm			叶间距/mm
	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差	范围	平均值	标准差
平均值	749			269			22.2			13.7			44.8			0.4			50
云烟87 （福建）	690~810	755	55.13	220~380	292	39.02	18.9~23.5	21.1	1.83	13.3~15.0	13.6	1.59	25~60	44.7	12.54	0.2~0.5	0.3	0.12	30~60	51	12.24
云烟87 （云南）	620~890	733	59.54	180~360	272	40.91	18.7~26.8	23.6	1.91	11.7~17.1	14.2	1.17	25~60	45.4	11.61	0.3~0.6	0.5	0.11	40~80	55	10.73
K326 （云南）	590~920	758	34.68	210~400	276	40.86	18.5~26.8	22.7	1.31	11~17.3	13.2	0.73	30~55	44.4	12.02	0.3~0.8	0.5	0.11	20~70	45	13.28

参数	l ₁/mm	l ₂/mm	l ₃/mm	l ₄/mm	l ₅/mm	θ ₀/°
优化前	55	150	150	150	160	90
优化后	39.72	170.26	153.18	163.92	119.09	89.75
优化后取整	40	170	150	160	120	90

材料	密度/（kg/mm³）	杨氏模量/MPa	泊松比
烟叶	8.50×10^-7	29.78	0.30
烟杆	1.60×10^-6	120.00	0.33
铝合金	2.74×10^-6	7.17×10⁴	0.33
钛合金	4.43×10^-6	1.05×10⁵	0.33
铜合金	8.96×10^-6	1.1×10⁵	0.33

方差源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
模型	0.043 4	6	0.007 2	35.920 0	0.027 3*
A	0.042 9	2	0.021 5	106.300 0	0.009 3**
B	0.000 0	2	0.000 0	0.108 1	0.902 4
C	0.000 5	2	0.000 2	1.150 0	0.465 3
误差	0.000 4	2	0.000 2	—	—
总和	0.043 8	8	—	—	—