1 |
ZHANG Z Y, ZHANG Y G, ZHANG Y, et al. The potential of satellite FPAR product for GPP estimation: An indirect evaluation using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2020, 240: ID 111686.
|
2 |
BAKER N R. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo [J]. Annual review of plant biology, 2008, 59: 89-113.
|
3 |
ZARCO-TEJADA P J, CATALINA A, GONZÁLEZ M R, et al. Relationships between net photosynthesis and steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence retrieved from airborne hyperspectral imagery[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2013, 136: 247-258.
|
4 |
庄家煜, 包维嘉, 苏武峥. 农业遥感应用现状与展望[J]. 农业展望, 2024, 20(4): 68-74.
|
|
ZHUANG J Y, BAO W J, SU W Z. Current situation and prospect of agricultural remote sensing technology application[J]. Agricultural outlook, 2024, 20(4): 68-74.
|
5 |
KÖHLER P, GUANTER L, JOINER J. A linear method for the retrieval of Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY data[J]. Atmospheric measurement techniques, 2015, 8(6): 2589-2608.
|
6 |
JOINER J, GUANTER L, LINDSTROT R, et al. Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: Methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2[J]. Atmospheric measurement techniques, 2013, 6(10): 2803-2823.
|
7 |
JOINER J, YOSHIDA Y, VASILKOV A P, et al. First observations of global and seasonal terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from space[J]. Biogeosciences, 2011, 8(3): 637-651.
|
8 |
SUN Y, FRANKENBERG C, JUNG M, et al. Overview of Solar-Induced chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: Retrieval, cross-mission comparison, and global monitoring for GPP[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2018, 209: 808-823.
|
9 |
FRANKENBERG C, O'DELL C, BERRY J, et al. Prospects for chlorophyll fluorescence remote sensing from the orbiting carbon observatory-2[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2014, 147: 1-12.
|
10 |
章钊颖, 王松寒, 邱博, 等. 日光诱导叶绿素荧光遥感反演及碳循环应用进展[J]. 遥感学报, 2019, 23(1): 37-52.
|
|
ZHANG Z Y, WANG S H, QIU B, et al. Retrieval of Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and advancements in carbon cycle application[J]. Journal of remote sensing, 2019, 23(1): 37-52.
|
11 |
ZHANG L L, ZHANG Z, LUO Y C, et al. Combining optical, fluorescence, thermal satellite, and environmental data to predict county-level maize yield in China using machine learning approaches[J]. Remote sensing, 2019, 12(1): ID 21.
|
12 |
CAO J, ZHANG Z, TAO F L, et al. Integrating multi-source data for rice yield prediction across China using machine learning and deep learning approaches[J]. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2021,297: ID 108275.
|
13 |
GUO M, LI J, HUANG S B, et al. Feasibility of using MODIS products to simulate Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in boreal forests[J]. Remote sensing, 2020, 12(4): ID 680.
|
14 |
YANG P Q, VANDERTOL C, VERHOEF W,et al.Using reflectance to explain vegetation biochemical and structural effects on sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2019, 231: ID 110996.
|
15 |
DUVEILLER G, FILIPPONI F, WALTHER S, et al. A spatially downscaled Sun-induced fluorescence global product for enhanced monitoring of vegetation productivity[J]. Earth system science data, 2020, 12(2): 1101-1116.
|
16 |
MA Y, LIU L Y, LIU X J, et al. An improved downscaled Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (DSIF) product of GOME-2 dataset[J]. European journal of remote sensing, 2022, 55(1): 168-180.
|
17 |
LI X, XIAO J F. A global, 0.05-degree product of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence derived from OCO-2, MODIS, and reanalysis data[J]. Remote sensing, 2019, 11(5): ID 517.
|
18 |
YU L, WEN J, CHANG C Y, et al. High-resolution global contiguous SIF of OCO-2[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2019, 46(3): 1449-1458.
|
19 |
DUVEILLER G, CESCATTI A. Spatially downscaling Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence leads to an improved temporal correlation with gross primary productivity[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2016, 182: 72-89.
|
20 |
WEN J, KÖHLER P, DUVEILLER G, et al. A framework for harmonizing multiple satellite instruments to generate a long-term global high spatial-resolution solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF)[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2020, 239: ID 111644.
|
21 |
LIU X J, LIU L Y, BACOUR C, et al. A simple approach to enhance the TROPOMI solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence product by combining with canopy reflected radiation at near-infrared band[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2023, 284: ID 113341.
|
22 |
KANG X Y, HUANG C P, ZHANG L F, et al. Downscaling solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence for field-scale cotton yield estimation by a two-step convolutional neural network[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 201: ID 107260.
|
23 |
YOSHIDA Y, JOINER J, TUCKER C, et al. The 2010 Russian drought impact on satellite measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from modeling and comparisons with parameters derived from satellite reflectances[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2015, 166: 163-177.
|
24 |
YANG X, TANG J W, MUSTARD J F, et al. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2015, 42(8): 2977-2987.
|
25 |
KIRA O, Y-Y CHANG C, GU L, et al. Partitioning net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF)[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2021, 48(4): ID e2020GL091247.
|
26 |
GAO Y, WANG S H, GUAN K Y, et al. The ability of Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from OCO-2 and MODIS-EVI to monitor spatial variations of soybean and maize yields in the Midwestern USA[J]. Remote sensing, 2020, 12(7): ID 1111.
|
27 |
MOHAMMED G H, COLOMBO R, MIDDLETON E M, et al. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in vegetation: 50 years of progress[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2019, 231: ID 111177.
|
28 |
梁守真, 马万栋, 王猛, 等. 冠层绿色FPAR与植被指数关系及其对气溶胶的敏感性分析[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2018, 41(12): 11-14.
|
|
LIANG S Z, MA W D, WANG M, et al. Analysis on the relationship between green FPAR and vegetation indices and their sensitivity to aerosol optical depth[J]. Geomatics & spatial information technology, 2018, 41(12): 11-14.
|
29 |
KÖEHLER P, FRANKENBERG C, MAGNEY T S, et al. Global retrievals of solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence with TROPOMI: First results and inter-sensor comparison to OCO-2[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2018, 45(19): 10456-10463.
|
30 |
FRANKENBERG C, FISHER J B, WORDEN J, et al. New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2011, 38(17): ID 2011GL048738.
|
31 |
GUANTER L, FRANKENBERG C, DUDHIA A, et al. Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2012, 121: 236-251.
|
32 |
PARAZOO N C, BOWMAN K, FRANKENBERG C, et al. Interpreting seasonal changes in the carbon balance of southern Amazonia using measurements of XCO2 and chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2013, 40(11): 2829-2833.
|
33 |
GENTINE P, ALEMOHAMMAD S H. Reconstructed solar-induced fluorescence: A machine learning vegetation product based on MODIS surface reflectance to reproduce GOME-2 solar-induced fluorescence[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2018, 45(7): 3136-3146.
|
34 |
LI X, XIAO J F, HE B B. Chlorophyll fluorescence observed by OCO-2 is strongly related to gross primary productivity estimated from flux towers in temperate forests[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2018, 204: 659-671.
|
35 |
MA Y, LIU L Y, CHEN R N, et al. Generation of a global spatially continuous TanSat solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence product by considering the impact of the solar radiation intensity[J]. Remote sensing, 2020, 12(13): ID 2167.
|