蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量评价预测模型构建方法及性能测试

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.2020.2.3.202003-SA010

Smart Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3): 37-47.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.2020.2.3.202003-SA010

• 专题--农业人工智能与大数据 • 上一篇下一篇

蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量评价预测模型构建方法及性能测试

李华龙¹(), 李淼¹(), 詹凯²(), 刘先旺¹, 杨选将¹, 胡泽林¹, 郭盼盼¹

^1.中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院智能机械研究所，安徽合肥 230031
^2.安徽省农业科学院畜牧与兽医研究所，安徽合肥 230031

收稿日期:2020-03-02 修回日期:2020-08-06 出版日期:2020-09-30
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31902205);安徽省重点研发计划(201904a06020041);国家现代农业（蛋鸡）产业技术体系(CARS-40-K21)
作者简介:李华龙（1984－），男，博士，助理研究员，研究方向为畜禽养殖环境控制技术与应用。E-mail：hlli@iim.ac.cn。
通信作者: 1.李淼（1955－），女，研究员，研究方向为农业信息技术研究与应用。电话：13955132281。E-mail：mli@iim.ac.cn；
2. 詹凯（1968－），男，研究员，研究方向为蛋鸡生产与环境控制。电话：13966677476。E-mail：zhankai633@126.com

Construction Method and Performance Test of Prediction Model for Laying Hen Breeding Environmental Quality Evaluation

LI Hualong¹(), LI Miao¹(), ZHAN Kai²(), LIU Xianwang¹, YANG Xuanjiang¹, HU Zelin¹, GUO Panpan¹

^1.Institute of Intelligent Machines, Hefei Institutes of Physical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
^2.Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Agricultural Academy of Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, China

Received:2020-03-02 Revised:2020-08-06 Online:2020-09-30
corresponding author:
1. LI Miao, E-mail：mli@iim.ac.cn；

2. ZHAN Kai, E-mail：zhankai633@126.com
About author:LI Hualong, E-mail：hlli@iim.ac.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31902205); Anhui Province Key Research and Development Program (201904a06020041); National Modern Agriculture (Egg Chicken) Industry Technology System (CARS-40-K21)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量对蛋鸡的健康生长和生产性能的提升至关重要。蛋鸡养殖环境是多环境因子相互影响制约的复杂非线性系统，凭借单一的养殖环境参数难以对环境质量做出准确有效的评价。针对上述问题，本研究综合蛋鸡设施养殖环境的温度、湿度、光照强度、氨气浓度等多个环境影响因子，在布谷鸟搜索算法优化神经网络（CS-BP）预测模型的基础上，构建了改进的CS-BP的蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量评价预测模型。将构建的改进CS-BP预测模型与BP神经网络、遗传算法优化BP神经网络（GA-BP）、粒子群算法优化BP神经网络（PSO-BP）3种深度学习方法进行性能参数分析比对，结果表明：改进CS-BP评价预测模型的平均绝对误差（MAE）、平均相对误差（MAPE）和决定系数（R²）分别为0.0865、0.0159和0.8569，其各项指标性能均优于上述3种对比模型，该模型具有较强的模型泛化能力和较高的预测精度。对改进CS-BP的蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量评价模型进行测试，其分类准确率达0.9333以上。本研究构建的模型可以为蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量提供更加全面有效的科学评价，对实现蛋鸡生产环境的最优控制，促进蛋鸡生产性能的提升具有重要意义。

关键词: 蛋鸡设施养殖, 环境质量评价, 布谷鸟搜索算法优化神经网络（CS-BP）, 遗传算法优化BP神经网络（GA-BP）, 粒子群算法优化BP神经网络（PSO-BP）, 深度学习, 多环境因子

Abstract:

Environmental quality of facilities affects the healthy growth and production of laying hens. The breeding environment of laying hens is a complex and non-linear system in which multiple environmental factors interact and restrict each other. It is difficult to make an accurate and effective evaluation on the suitability of laying hens with a single breeding environment parameter. In order to solve the above problem, an improved cuckoo search algorithm optimization neural network (CS-BP) model for the evaluation and prediction of the environmental suitability of laying hen facility was proposed in this research. In this model, the effects of environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, light intensity and ammonia concentration were comprehensively analyzed, and the problem of high prediction accuracy caused by BP neural network easily falling into local minimum value was overcome. In the experiment, the model was compared with BP neural network, genetic algorithm optimized BP neural network (GA-BP) and particle swarm optimization BP neural network (PSO-BP). The results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE), mean relative error (MAPE) and the coefficient of determination (R²) of the prediction model based on the improved CS-BP were 0.0865, 0.0159 and 0.8569, respectively. The prediction model based on the improved CS-BP had a strong generalization ability and a high testing precision, and its index performance was better than the above three comparison models. The classification accuracy of the improved CS-BP model was tested, and the result was 0.9333. The model constructed in this research can provide more comprehensive and effective scientific evaluation for the environmental quality of laying hens facility, which is of great significance to realize the optimal control of the production environment and promote the production performance of layers.

Key words: facility breeding for laying hens, environmental quality evaluation, CS-BP, GA-BP, PSO-BP, deep learning, multiple environmental factors

中图分类号:

TP183

李华龙, 李淼, 詹凯, 刘先旺, 杨选将, 胡泽林, 郭盼盼. 蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量评价预测模型构建方法及性能测试[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2020, 2(3): 37-47.

LI Hualong, LI Miao, ZHAN Kai, LIU Xianwang, YANG Xuanjiang, HU Zelin, GUO Panpan. Construction Method and Performance Test of Prediction Model for Laying Hen Breeding Environmental Quality Evaluation[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2020, 2(3): 37-47.

参考文献

1	李保明, 王阳, 郑炜超. 我国规模化养鸡环境控制技术的最新进展[J]. 中国家禽, 2019, 41(9): 1-7.
1	LI B, WANG Y, ZHENG W. Advances in environment control technology of poultry in China[J]. China Poultry, 2019, 41(9): 1-7.
2	滕光辉. 畜禽设施精细养殖中信息感知与环境调控综述[J]. 智慧农业, 2019, 1(3): 1-12.
2	TENG G. Information sensing and environment control of precision facility livestock and poultry farming[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2019, 1(3): 1-12.
3	赵一广, 杨亮, 郑姗姗, 等. 家畜智能养殖设备和饲喂技术应用研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 智慧农业, 2019, 1(1): 20-31.
3	ZHAO Y, YANG L, ZHENG S, et al. Advances in the development and applications of intelligent equipment and feeding technology for livestock production[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2019, 1(1): 20-31.
4	KUANG W, LIU H, YAO Y, et al. The monitoring and analysis of cascade cage laying house environmental quality and laying performance[J]. China Poultry. 2017, 39(1): 64-65.
5	左玲玲. 我国生猪生产发展政策措施[J]. 兽医导刊, 2017(7): 17-18.
5	ZUO L. Policy measures for the development of pig production in China[J]. Veterinary Orientation, 2017 (7): 17-18.
6	XIN H, GATES R S, GREEN A R, et al. Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems[J]. Poultry Science, 2011, 90 (1): 263-277.
7	周可嘉. 现代化超大规模蛋鸡舍冬春季环境参数控制综合评价研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.
7	ZHOU K. Comprehensive evaluation of environmental parameters control in winter and spring in modern super large scale layer house[D]. Yangling: Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University, 2014.
8	谢秋菊, 苏中滨, NI J, 等. 猪舍环境适宜性模糊综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 23(16): 198-205.
8	XIE Q, SU Z, NI J, et al. Fuzzy synthetic assessment of swine house environmental adaptability[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 23(16): 198-205.
9	BASAK J K, ARULMOZHI E, KHAN F, et al. Modelling of ambient environment and thermal status relationship of pig's body in a pig barn[J]. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 2020, 54(8): 1049-1054.
10	陈冲, 刘星桥, 刘超吉, 等. 哺乳母猪舍环境舒适度评价预测模型优化[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(8): 311-319.
10	CHEN C, LIU X, LIU C, et al. Optimization of evaluation and prediction model of environmental comfort in lactating sow house[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020, 51(8): 311-319.
11	KARADURMUS E, CESMECI M, YUCEER M. An artificial neural network model for the effects of chicken manure on ground water[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12: 494-497.
12	陈伟宏, 安吉尧, 李仁发, 等. 深度学习认知计算综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2017, 43(11): 1886-1897.
12	CHEN W, AN J, LI R, et al. Review on deep-learning-based cognitive computing[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(11): 1886-1897.
13	MIRZAEE-GHALEH, OMID M, KEYHANI A, et al. Comparison of fuzzy and on/off controllers for winter season indoor climate management in a model poultry house[J]. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 110: 187-195.
14	RAMIREZ-MORALES I, FERNANDEZ-BLANCO E, RIVERO D. Automated early detection of drops in commercial egg production using neural networks[J]. British Poultry Science, 2017, 58(6): 739-747.
15	YAKUBU A, OLUERMI O, EKPO E. Predicting heat stress index in Sasso hens using automatic linear modelling and artificial neural network[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2018, 62(7): 1181-1186.
16	李若飞, 魏萍, 敖长林, 等. 鸡舍环境细菌的神经网络模型相关分析[J]. 现代畜牧兽医, 2009(6): 65-68.
16	LI R, WEI P, AO C, et al. Neural network model correlation analysis of environmental bacteria in chicken house[J]. Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2009(6): 65-68.
17	易姣红. 基于布谷鸟搜索算法优化神经网络的研究[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2014.
17	YI J. Research on BP neural network optimization by cukoo search algorithm[D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Science and Technology, 2014.
18	SHARMA V, KUMAR R. A cooperative network framework for multi-UAV guided ground Ad Hoc networks[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems. 2015, 77(3/4): 629-652.
19	刘先旺, 李华龙, 李淼, 等. 基于CS和BP的鸡舍环境与产蛋性能关系模型研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(11): 267-270.
19	LIU X, LI H, LI M, et al. Study on the relationship model between the environment of chicken house and egg laying performance based on CS and BP[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(11): 267-270.
20	李华龙, 李淼, 詹凯, 等. 基于物联网的层叠式鸡舍环境智能监控系统[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(S2): 210-215.
20	LI H, LI M, ZHAN K, et al. Intelligent monitoring system for laminated henhouse based on Internet of Things[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(S2): 210-215.
21	中华人民共和国农业部. 畜禽场环境质量标准: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
21	Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. Environmental quality standards for livestock farms: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2000.
22	王阳, 石海鹏, 王雅韬, 等. 侧墙进风小窗位置对蛋鸡舍内环境的影响[J]. 中国家禽, 2016, 38(16): 38-42.
22	WANG Y, SHI H, WANG Y, et al. Effect of air inlets situation on microenvironment of layer house in winter[J]. China Poultry, 2016, 38(16): 38-42.
23	ZHAO Y, SHEPHERD T A, LI H, et al. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems—Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality[J]. Poultry Science, 2015, 94(3): 518-533.

[1]	李豪, 杜雨秋, 肖星竹, 陈彦羲. 基于深度学习的四川盆地丘陵区县域耕地遥感识别研究[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(3): 34-45.
[2]	聂刚刚, 饶洪辉, 李泽锋, 刘木华. 基于改进YOLACT的油茶叶片炭疽病感染严重程度分级模型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(3): 138-147.
[3]	张京, 赵泽瑄, 赵艳茹, 卜泓超, 吴星宇. 基于Bi-GRU和空-谱信息融合的油菜菌核病侵染区域高光谱图像分割方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 40-48.
[4]	庞春晖, 陈鹏, 夏懿, 章军, 王兵, 邹岩, 陈天娇, 康辰瑞, 梁栋. 用于小麦多生长阶段倒伏边界精准检测的分层交互特征金字塔网络[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 128-139.
[5]	张玉玉, 邴树营, 纪元浩, 严蓓蓓, 许金普. 基于改进YOLOv8s的玫瑰鲜切花分级方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 118-127.
[6]	张建华, 姚琼, 周国民, 吴雯迪, 修晓杰, 王健. 作物农艺性状与形态结构表型智能识别技术综述[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 14-27.
[7]	郭旺, 杨雨森, 吴华瑞, 朱华吉, 缪祎晟, 顾静秋. 农业大模型：关键技术、应用分析与发展方向[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 1-13.
[8]	王鹤榕, 陈英义, 柴莹倩, 徐玲, 于辉辉. 融合VoVNetv2和置换注意力机制的鱼群摄食图像分割方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(4): 137-149.
[9]	李政凯, 于嘉辉, 潘时佳, 贾泽丰, 牛子杰. 冬季猕猴桃树单木骨架提取与冠层生长预测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(4): 92-104.
[10]	唐辉, 王铭, 于秋实, 张佳茜, 刘连涛, 王楠. 融合改进UNet和迁移学习的棉花根系图像分割方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 96-109.
[11]	泮玮婷, 孙梦丽, 员琰, 刘平. 基于深度学习ImCascade R-CNN的小麦籽粒表形鉴定方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 110-120.
[12]	管博伦, 张立平, 朱静波, 李闰枚, 孔娟娟, 汪焱, 董伟. 农业病虫害图像数据集构建关键问题及评价方法综述[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 17-34.
[13]	龙佳宁, 张昭, 刘晓航, 李云霞, 芮照钰, 余江帆, 张漫, FLORES Paulo, 韩哲雄, 胡灿, 王旭峰. 利用改进EfficientNetV2和无人机图像检测小麦倒伏类型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 62-74.
[14]	刘易雪, 宋育阳, 崔萍, 房玉林, 苏宝峰. 基于无人机遥感和深度学习的葡萄卷叶病感染程度诊断方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 49-61.
[15]	毛克彪, 张晨阳, 施建成, 王旭明, 郭中华, 李春树, 董立新, 吴门新, 孙瑞静, 武胜利, 姬大彬, 蒋玲梅, 赵天杰, 邱玉宝, 杜永明, 徐同仁. 基于人工智能的地球物理参数反演范式理论及判定条件[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(2): 161-171.

蛋鸡设施养殖环境质量评价预测模型构建方法及性能测试

Construction Method and Performance Test of Prediction Model for Laying Hen Breeding Environmental Quality Evaluation

在线阅读

知网下载

本地下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价