欢迎您访问《智慧农业(中英文)》官方网站! English

Smart Agriculture

• •    

数字素养对农牧户贷款行为影响的研究述评与展望

乌云花(), 艾丽雅   

  1. 内蒙古农业大学经济管理学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010011,中国
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-13 出版日期:2026-04-22
  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金(72163024); 农村牧区综合发展创新团队项目(NMGIRT2223)
  • 通信作者:
    乌云花,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为农牧业经济理论与政策。E-mail:

A Review and Prospect of the Impact of Digital Literacy on the Loan Behavior of Farmers and Herdsmen

WU Yunhua(), AI Liya   

  1. College of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China
  • Received:2026-01-13 Online:2026-04-22
  • Foundation items:National Natural Science Foundation Project(72163024); Rural and Pastoral Comprehensive Development Innovation Team Project(NMGIRT2223)
  • Corresponding author:
    WU Yunhua, E-mail:

摘要:

【目的/意义】 数字素养是影响农牧户融入数字金融市场、获取信贷服务的关键能力。本文系统梳理数字素养、农牧户贷款行为及其数字素养对农牧户贷款行为的影响,对于深化农村金融理论、制定精准的农牧区数字普惠金融政策具有重要意义。 【进展】 首先梳理了数字素养概念的动态演进与多维测度体系的发展。其次,关于农牧户贷款行为,梳理了农牧户融资可得性的影响因素、农村金融“最后一公里”梗阻,以及数字素养对农牧区数字金融服务发展的促进作用。最后,梳理数字素养对农牧户贷款行为的影响机制。 【结论/展望】 结论表明,数字素养通过提升信息获取、拓展社会网络、增强信用可见度等途径,对农牧户正规与非正规信贷可得性产生积极影响。但仍存在局限:已有研究侧重于农区和农户的比较多,但是针对牧区和牧户的研究不足,测度工具适配性不够,牧区的独特性与牧户的异质性未受到充分重视,影响机制黑箱待解。未来研究需补充构建以牧区和牧户为导向的理论与数字素养测度框架,推进方法创新与数据积累,深化异质性研究,拓展研究边界,为农牧户行为研究提供更坚实的理论支撑与实践指引。

关键词: 数字素养, 农牧户, 贷款行为, 数字普惠金融, 异质性

Abstract:

[Significance] Digital literacy is essential for farming and herding households to integrate into digital financial markets and access credit services. Against the backdrop of the rapid development of inclusive digital finance, a systematic review of existing research on the relationship between digital literacy and the borrowing behaviour of farming and herding households is significant for deepening rural financial theory, revealing the mechanisms underlying the digital divide and formulating targeted digital financial policies for rural and pastoral areas. This paper focuses on farming and herding households, emphasising that, in a fintech-driven environment, digital literacy influences access to financing, economic resilience, and sustainable development capabilities, and is not merely a matter of technological adoption. [Progress] It is found that the concept of digital literacy had undergone a progressive evolution from information literacy, internet literacy, and media literacy to digital literacy, gradually forming a comprehensive competency framework that encompassed multiple dimensions, including information retrieval, communication and collaboration, content creation, and security. About measurement, the EU's DigComp 2.2 and UNESCO's DLGF had been adopted extensively. Domestic research had constructed indicator systems across multiple dimensions, including general, social, creative, security, and financial aspects. However, the adaptability of existing measurement tools in pastoral contexts remained insufficient. Regarding the loan behaviour of farming and herding households, extant research was found to focus primarily on financing accessibility, the "last-mile" bottlenecks in rural finance, and the role of digital literacy in promoting digital financial services. The accessibility of financing was influenced by a multitude of factors, including individual and household characteristics, social capital, the policy environment, and technological development. Rural financial bottlenecks were identified as the result of several challenges, such as poor institutional transmission, insufficient technological adaptation, lack of resource guarantees, and mismatched service design. Digital literacy was demonstrated to enhance the availability of both formal and informal credit for farming and herding households by means of improving information access efficiency, expanding social networks, increasing credit visibility, and optimising risk identification. It was also shown to play a positive role in promoting income growth, technology adoption, and economic resilience. [Conclusions and Prospects] The extant research was found to confirm the positive impact of digital literacy on the loan-taking behaviour of farming and herding households. However, significant limitations remained to be addressed. Firstly, the research perspective had been primarily focused on agricultural areas and farming households, with a severe lack of specialised studies on pastoral areas and herding households, thereby overlooking the unique circumstances of pastoral areas, such as the seasonal nature of production, the biological nature of assets, and the dispersed nature of settlements. Secondly, digital literacy measurement tools were inadequately adapted to pastoral contexts, failing to cover core pastoral production scenarios such as pasture monitoring, remote livestock management, and e-commerce sales. Thirdly, research on the underlying mechanisms remained superficial; specifically, how digital literacy influenced borrowing behaviour through intermediary pathways such as social capital, financial knowledge, and risk preference, particularly the differentiated mechanisms between formal and informal channels, had yet to be clarified. Fourthly, difficulties in data acquisition and limitations in research methods were found to have constrained the reliability of causal inferences. Fifthly, there was a mismatch between digital finance policies and the actual needs of pastoral areas. It was recommended that future research efforts concentrate on the development of a theoretical analytical framework and measurement system that was specifically tailored to the pastoral context. This was to be accompanied by the advancement of large-scale, long-term micro-surveys and the development of panel data. Researchers were also advised to actively incorporate methods such as experimental economics and machine learning into their studies. Furthermore, there was a need to deepen the analysis of stratified studies on the internal heterogeneity of herding households. The implementation outcomes of existing digital inclusive finance policies and training programmes were to be systematically evaluated. Additionally, it was considered crucial to proactively address emerging topics such as green credit, insurtech and supply chain finance. Finally, critical issues including digital risk governance and algorithmic fairness were noted as requiring due attention. This provides both theoretical support and practical guidance for ensuring that digital finance benefits a wide range of farmers and herders in a more precise and equitable manner.

Key words: digital literacy, farmers and herdsmen, loan behavior, digital inclusive finance, heterogeneity

中图分类号: