光声光谱技术在农林产品品质评估中的应用研究进展

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.SA202505026

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的/意义】 农林产品品质评估是保障食品安全和提高产品竞争力的核心环节，传统检测方法存在破坏样本、设备昂贵、适应性差等缺陷。近年来，光声光谱技术凭借非接触、高灵敏、多形态适应等特性，逐步应用于农林产品品质评估中，为突破农林产品内外品质同步检测提供新的解决方案。 【进展】 本文综述了光声光谱技术最新进展并探讨未来方向，旨在为相关领域研究者构建系统化的技术发展框架。目前，在硬件创新上，量子级联激光器与共振式光声池可显著提升光声光谱检测灵敏度。在方法应用方面，多频深度扫描技术实现了种子胚乳层与果蔬皮下组织的层析分析，提高了光声光谱对农林产品深度辨析的能力。在实际应用中，光声光谱技术已成功用于种子品质评估、果蔬品质检测、粮油成分分析和食品真实性与安全检测。 【结论/展望】 光声光谱技术在实际产业应用中仍面临样品异质性干扰、环境噪声抑制、多组分谱峰重叠、设备微型化等挑战。未来研究需着力开发融合多种感知技术的多模态传感系统以获取多维度信息；研制芯片化光声探测器，实现系统微型化与硬件成本降低；并构建基于迁移学习的小样本自适应模型，利用注意力机制解析多组分谱峰重叠问题，从而提升在果蔬谷物等复杂基质上的泛化检测能力。随着硬件成本下降和深度学习技术发展，光声光谱技术有望构建覆盖“田间采收-加工仓储-市场流通”的全链条检测方案，推动农林产品质量管控向智能化、标准化迈进，为产业升级提供关键技术支撑。

关键词: 光声光谱, 光学传感, 农林产品品质, 无损检测, 种子品质, 果蔬品质, 粮油成分

Abstract:

[Significance] The quality assessment of agricultural and forestry products is a core process in ensuring food safety and enhancing product competitiveness. Traditional detection methods suffer from drawbacks such as sample destruction, expensive equipment, and poor adaptability. As an innovative analytical technique combining optical and acoustic detection principles, photoacoustic spectroscopy technology (PAS) overcomes the limitations of conventional detection techniques that rely on transmitted or reflected optical signals through its unique light-thermal-acoustic energy conversion mechanism. With its non-contact, high-sensitivity, and multi-form adaptability characteristics, PAS has been increasingly applied in the quality assessment of agricultural and forestry products in recent years, providing a new solution for the simultaneous detection of internal and external quality in these products. [Progress] In the specific applications of agricultural and forestry product testing, PAS has demonstrated practical value in multiple aspects. In seed testing, researchers have established quantitative relationship models between photoacoustic signals and seed viability also achieved dynamic assessment of seed health by monitoring respiratory metabolic gases (e.g., CO₂ and ethylene). In fruit and vegetable quality analysis, PAS can capture characteristic substance changes during ripening. In the quality control of grain and oil products, Fourier-transform infrared PAS technology has been successfully applied to the rapid detection of protein content in wheat flour and aflatoxin in corn. In food safety monitoring, PAS has achieved breakthrough progress in heavy metal residue detection, pesticide residue analysis, and food authenticity identification. [Conclusions and Prospects] Despite its evident advantages, PAS technology still faces multiple challenges in practical implementation. Technically, the complex matrix of agricultural and forestry products causes non-uniform generation and propagation of photoacoustic signals, complicating data analysis. And environmental noise interference (e.g., mechanical vibrations, temperature fluctuations) compromises detection stability, while spectral peak overlap in multi-component systems limits quantitative analysis accuracy. Equipment-wise, current PAS systems remain bulky and costly, primarily due to reliance on imported core components like high-power lasers and precision lock-in amplifiers, severely hindering widespread adoption. Moreover, the absence of standardized photoacoustic databases and universal analytical models restricts the technology's adaptability across diverse agricultural products. Looking forward, PAS development may focus on these key directions.Firstly, multi-technology integration by combining with Raman spectroscopy, near-infrared spectroscopy, and other sensing methods to construct multidimensional data spaces for enhanced detection specificity. Moreover, miniaturization through developing chip-based detectors via micro-electromechanical technology, replacing conventional solid-state lasers with vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs), and adopting 3D printing for integrated photoacoustic cell fabrication to significantly reduce system size and cost. Furthermore, intelligent algorithm innovation with incorporating advanced deep learning models like attention mechanisms and transfer learning to improve interpretation of complex photoacoustic spectra. As these technical bottlenecks are progressively overcome, PAS is poised to establish a quality monitoring network spanning the entire "field-to-market" chain—from harvesting to processing/storage to distribution—thereby transforming agricultural quality control from traditional sampling-based methods to intelligent, standardized, full-process monitoring. This will provide technical support for food safety assurance and agricultural industry advancement.

Key words: photoacoustic spectroscopy, optical sensing, quality of agricultural and forestry products, non-destructive detection, seed quality, fruit and vegetable quality, grain and oil composition

中图分类号:

TS255.1

谢为俊, 陈科颖, 乔梦梦, 吴斌, 郭庆, 赵茂程. 光声光谱技术在农林产品品质评估中的应用研究进展[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(4): 18-30.

XIE Weijun, CHEN Keying, QIAO Mengmeng, WU Bin, GUO Qing, ZHAO Maocheng. Application of Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in Quality Assessment of Agricultural and Forestry Products[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(4): 18-30.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

光声光谱技术在粮油品质分析领域的应用

技术方法	应用领域	研究对象	检测目标形态	数据处理方法	核心目标	波长范围	功率	光调制频率	特征波长范围
光声光谱^［49］	谷物质量评估	玉米	固态	感官评价相关性分析	关联光吸收特性与消费者感知颜色	350~700 nm	——	17 Hz	350~670 nm
紫外-可见光声光谱^［50］	谷物成分分析	红高粱	粉末	F检验、t检验	替代传统化学法测定酚类化合物	200~800 nm	——	18 Hz	285 nm 335 nm
傅里叶变换红外光声光谱^［51］	谷物黄曲霉素检测	玉米	固态	专家系统	玉米黄曲霉侵染检测	4 000~600 cm^-1	140 W	——	3 400~3 360 cm^-1 2 853~2 923 cm^-1 3 200~2 200 cm^-1
傅里叶变换红外光声光谱^［52］	谷物营养成分分析	小麦	粉末	主成分分析、多变量校准模型	测定小麦粉中的总蛋白和湿面筋	4 000~500 cm^-1	——	——	4 000~2 300 cm^-1 2 300~1 600 cm^-1 1 600~400 cm^-1
光声光谱^［53］	谷物光学系数测定	玉米	固体	波长和谷物状态、厚度和光学不透明数据分析	确定玉米种的光吸收系数	320~700 nm	——	——	633 nm
光声光谱^［54］	谷物病原体检测	小麦	固态	特征峰识别	快速诊断小麦携带的病原菌污染	200~800 nm	——	18 Hz	285和335 nm
紫外-可见光声光谱^［55］	谷物质量评估	玉米	固态	主成分分析	区分不同产地玉米的营养品质差异	270~500 nm	——	17 Hz	325~395 nm
光声光谱^［56］	谷物质量评估	玉米	固态	方差分析	谷物反射率测量、物理特性和养分含量	270~500 nm	——	——	290 nm 350 nm
光声光谱^［57］	谷物质量评估	豆类	固态	相关性分析	优化激光参数以提升谷物储藏性能	270~500 nm	——	17 Hz	470 nm
光声光谱^［58］	谷物评估	玉米	固态	非辐射弛豫模型	研究种子色素分子能量衰减过程	350、470和650 nm	700 W	17~50 Hz	350 nm
光声光谱^［59］	谷物质量检测	大麦	固态	光学吸收系数分析 + 方差分析	评估激光处理对谷物微生物的抑制作用	650 nm	27.4 mW	17 Hz	650 nm
光声光谱^［60］	谷物分类	玉米	固态	标准差分析、一阶导数处理	提高颜色差异玉米的检测灵敏度	325~800 nm	——	17 Hz	325~670 nm
多频光声光谱^［61］	种子深度剖面分析	玉米	固态	频率扫描热扩散模型	无损获取玉米内部结构信息	330~800 nm	——	17~50 Hz	350~800 nm
光声光谱^［62］	谷物健康监测	玉米	固态	方差分析	分析激光处理对色素合成的生物刺激效应	400~500 nm	27.4 mW	17 Hz	471~478 nm
光声光谱^［63］	谷物健康管理	大麦	固态	微生物计数统计分析	验证激光处理对种子真菌污染的抑制作用	650 nm	27.4 mW	——	650 nm
光声光谱^［64］	谷物生物物理学	玉米	固态	温度-时间曲线分析	研究激光辐照对玉米种子表面温度的影响	650 nm	27.4 mW	——	650 nm
光声显微镜^［65］	谷物老化评估	小麦/玉米种子	固态	热成像分析	评估谷物老化对内部结构的影响	330~800 nm	——	1 Hz	——
光热电显微镜^［66］	谷物检测	玉米	固态	直方图核密度估计	区分种子晶体与粉质结构	650 nm	100 mW	1 Hz	——
光声显微镜^［67］	谷物结构分析	玉米	固态	数据密度分布分析	优化热成像分辨率与深度敏感性	405、532和650 nm	5 mW	17 Hz	405 nm
光声光谱^［68］	油品质量检测	柯拜巴油	液态	光谱特征峰与浓度关联分析	分析油品在不同稀释条件下的光学特性	0.18~4.00 μm	700 W	——	0.23 和2.72 μm
傅里叶变换红外光声光谱^［69］	营养成分分析	油菜籽	固态	独立成分分析+偏最小二乘	快速无损测定氮含量	4 000~500 cm⁻¹	——	——	1 747、2 858和2 927 cm^-1
光声光谱^［70］	油品质量检测	大豆油	液态	主成分分析、Stacking集成模型	快速无损识别油品变质程度	0.18~4.00 μm	700 W	——	0.23 和1.40 μm

表1

图6

参考文献 87

[1]	ABASI S, MINAEI S, JAMSHIDI B, et al. Dedicated non-destructive devices for food quality measurement: A review[J]. Trends in food science & technology, 2018, 78: 197-205.
[2]	WANG Y, FENG Y H, ZHANG B C, et al. Machine learning-supported sensor array for multiplexed foodborne pathogenic bacteria detection and identification[J]. Trends in food science & technology, 2024, 154: ID 104787.
[3]	XIE W J, WEI S, ZHENG Z H, et al. A CNN-based lightweight ensemble model for detecting defective carrots[J]. Biosystems engineering, 2021, 208: 287-299.
[4]	LI Y, GUO L Z, YANG H N, et al. Multiscale bioimpedance detection methods and modeling for dynamic non-destructive monitoring of agricultural product quality[J]. Trends in food science & technology, 2025, 157: ID 104888.
[5]	XIE W J, ZHAO M C, LIU Y, et al. Recent advances in transformer technology for agriculture: a comprehensive survey[J]. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 2024, 138: ID 109412.
[6]	ZAUKUU J L, ATTIPOE N Q, KORNEH P B, et al. Detection of bissap calyces and bissap juices adulteration with sorghum leaves using NIR spectroscopy and VIS/NIR spectroscopy[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis, 2025, 141: ID 107358.
[7]	刘燕德, 刘良峰, 李雄, 等. 基于高光谱成像结合波段比和改进分水岭分割算法的草莓早期损伤检测[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2024, 29(11): 50-62.
	LIU Y D, LIU L F, LI X, et al. Detection of early damage on strawberries using hyperspectral reflectance imaging combined with band ratio and improved watershed segmentation algorithm[J]. Journal of China agricultural university, 2024, 29(11): 50-62.
[8]	王偲琦, 黄琳琳, 臧秀, 等. 低场核磁共振无损检测技术在水产品加工贮藏方面的应用[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(8): 1725-1729.
	WANG S Q, HUANG L L, ZANG X, et al. Application of low field nuclear magnetic technology in aquatic products processing and storage[J]. Journal of food safety & quality, 2018, 9(8): 1725-1729.
[9]	胡军, 吕豪豪, 乔鹏, 等. 基于太赫兹成像检测技术与特征提取方法结合巴旦木饱满度检测方法研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2024, 44(7): 1896-1904.
	HU J, LYU H H, QIAO P, et al. Research on almond plumpness detection method based on terahertz imaging technology and feature extraction method[J]. Spectroscopy and spectral analysis, 2024, 44(7): 1896-1904.
[10]	徐振, 刘燕德, 胡军, 等. 基于太赫兹时域光谱技术的掺假川贝母检测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(15): 308-314.
	XU Z, LIU Y D, HU J, et al. Detection of adulterated fritillariae using terahertz time domain spectroscopy[J]. Transactions of the Chinese society of agricultural engineering, 2021, 37(15): 308-314.
[11]	WANG D C, FENG Z, JI S Y, et al. Simultaneous prediction of peach firmness and weight using vibration spectra combined with one-dimensional convolutional neural network[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2022, 201: ID 107341.
[12]	SUN Y C, YU G, LU Q, et al. An electronic nose device with rapid and universal odor detection capability[J]. Sensors and actuators B: chemical, 2025, 440: ID 137871.
[13]	LI Z G, LIU J X, SI G S, et al. Design of a high-sensitivity differential Helmholtz photoacoustic cell and its application in methane detection[J]. Optics express, 2022, 30(16): 28984-28996.
[14]	CAO Y, LIU K, WANG R F, et al. Three-wavelength measurement of aerosol absorption using a multi-resonator coupled photoacoustic spectrometer[J]. Optics express, 2021, 29(2): 2258-2269.
[15]	ROSENCWAIG A. Photoacoustic spectroscopy of biological materials[J]. Science, 1973, 181(4100): 657-658.
[16]	ROSENCWAIG A. Photoacoustic spectroscopy. New tool for investigation of solids[J]. Analytical chemistry, 1975, 47(6): 592-604.
[17]	ROSENCWAIG A, GERSHO A. Theory of the photoacoustic effect with solids[J]. Journal of applied physics, 1976, 47(1): 64-69.
[18]	SUBBARAYA B H, LAL S. Rocket measurements of ozone concentrations in the stratosphere and mesosphere over Thumba[J]. Proceedings of the Indian academy of sciences-earth and planetary sciences, 1981, 90(2): 173-187.
[19]	KEERATIRAWEE K, HAUSER P C. Photoacoustic detection of ozone with a red laser diode[J]. Talanta, 2021, 223: ID 121890.
[20]	SUN B, WEI T T, ZHANG M J, et al. Optical synchronous signal demodulation-based quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy for remote, multi-point methane detection in complex environments[J]. Photoacoustics, 2025, 43: ID 100708.
[21]	VIRENDRA N, SURYA N. Chapter 2-Physics and instrumentation of photothermal and photoacoustic spectroscopy of solids[M]. Amsterdam: Photoacoustic and Photothermal Spectroscopy, Elsevier, 2023: 21-49.
[22]	ZHAO Y, WANG S Q, MERRILL J A, et al. Triplex radiometric, photoacoustic, and ultrasonic imaging based on single-pulse excitation[J]. Optics letters, 2020, 45(7): 1703-1706.
[23]	HOSSEINAEE Z, LE M, BELL K, et al. Towards non-contact photoacoustic imaging review[J]. Photoacoustics, 2020, 20: ID 100207.
[24]	DU J Y, YANG S S, QIAO Y C, et al. Recent progress in near-infrared photoacoustic imaging[J]. Biosensors and bioelectronics, 2021, 191: ID 113478.
[25]	SAMPAOLO A, PATIMISCO P, GIGLIO M, et al. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy for multi-gas detection: A review[J]. Analytica chimica acta, 2022, 1202: ID 338894.
[26]	张凤, 俞旭君, 董良, 等. 多光谱光声层析成像技术在精索静脉曲张大鼠睾丸成像中的初步探索[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2023, 48(10): 1166-1172.
	ZHANG F, YU X J, DONG L, et al. Initial exploration of multispectral optoacoustic tomography in imaging of the testes in varicocele rats[J]. Journal of Chongqing medical university, 2023, 48(10): 1166-1172.
[27]	NIKOLIĆ P M, TODOROVIĆ D M. Photoacoustic and electroacoustic properties of semiconductors[J]. Progress in quantum electronics, 1989, 13(2): 107-189.
[28]	ZHA S L, CHEN H, LIU C, et al. Multivariate-coupled-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy with Chebyshev rational fractional-order filtering algorithm for trace CH₄ detection[J]. Photoacoustics, 2025, 42: ID 100692.
[29]	LAI E P C, WONG B, VANDERNOOT V A. Preservation of solid mercuric dithizonate samples with polyvinyl chloride for determination of mercury(II) in environmental waters by photochromism-induced photoacoustic spectrometry[J]. Talanta, 1993, 40(7): 1097-1105.
[30]	HIRSCHMANN C B, SINISALO S, UOTILA J, et al. Trace gas detection of benzene, toluene, p-, m- and o-xylene with a compact measurement system using cantilever enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy and optical parametric oscillator[J]. Vibrational spectroscopy, 2013, 68: 170-176.
[31]	NAVAS M J, JIMÉNEZ A M, ASUERO A G. Human biomarkers in breath by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. Clinica chimica acta, 2012, 413(15/16): 1171-1178.
[32]	THAKUR S, RAI V, SINGH J. Chapter 3-Physics and techniques of photoacoustic spectroscopy of liquids[M]. Amsterdam: Photoacoustic and Photothermal Spectroscopy, Elsevier, 2023, 51-68.
[33]	张硕. 基于压电技术的固体光声光谱检测[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2011.
	ZHANG S. Solid photoacoustic spectrum detection based on piezoelectric technique[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2011.
[34]	LYU G Q, DU C W, MA F, et al. In situ detection of rice leaf cuticle responses to nitrogen supplies by depth-profiling Fourier transform photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. Spectrochimica acta part A, molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy, 2020, 228: ID 117759.
[35]	LIU L Y, WANG Z S, LI J, et al. A non-invasive analysis of seed vigor by infrared thermography[J]. Plants, 2020, 9(6): ID 768.
[36]	卢伟, 张孜谞, 蔡苗苗, 等. 基于光声光谱和TCA迁移学习的稻种活力检测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22): 341-348.
	LU W, ZHANG Z X, CAI M M, et al. Detection of rice seeds vigor based on photoacoustic spectrum combined with TCA transfer learning[J]. Transactions of the Chinese society of agricultural engineering, 2020, 36(22): 341-348.
[37]	李欢欢, 卢伟, 杜昌文, 等. 基于光声光谱结合LS-SVR的稻种活力快速无损检测方法研究[J]. 中国激光, 2015, 42(11): 280-289.
	LI H H, LU W, DU C W, et al. Study on rapid and non-destructive detection of rice seed vigor based on photoacoustic spectroscopy combined with LS-SVR[J]. Chinese journal of lasers, 2015, 42(11): 280-289.
[38]	王新宇, 牛鹏帅, 卢伟, 等. 基于光声光谱深度扫描的单粒玉米种子发芽率无损检测方法[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2020, 41(6): 119-125.
	WANG X Y, NIU P S, LU W, et al. A nondestructive detection method for single maize seed germination rate based on photoacoustic spectrum deep scanning[J]. Journal of South China agricultural university, 2020, 41(6): 119-125.
[39]	郭振宇, 樊亚杉, 翟保杰, 等. 光声光谱二氧化碳传感的种子活力检测[J]. 光学精密工程, 2025, 33(3): 367-376.
	GUO Z Y, FAN Y S, ZHAI B J, et al. Detection of seed viability by photoacoustic carbon dioxide sensing[J]. Optics and precision engineering, 2025, 33(3): 367-376.
[40]	POPA C, PETRUS M. Heavy metals impact at plants using photoacoustic spectroscopy technology with tunable CO₂ laser in the quantification of gaseous molecules[J]. Microchemical journal, 2017, 134: 390-399.
[41]	HUANG Z C, SAITO Y, GAO T Q, et al. A review of fluorescence imaging system supported by excitation-emission matrix for fruit and vegetable quality estimation[J]. Food control, 2025, 169: ID 111040.
[42]	BERGEVIN M, N'SOUKPOÉ-KOSSI C, CHARLEBOIS D, et al. Assessment of strawberry maturity by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. Applied spectroscopy, 1995, 49(3): 397-399.
[43]	POPA C, DUMITRAS D C, PATACHIA M, et al. Testing fruit quality by photoacoustic spectroscopy assay[J]. Laser physics, 2014, 24(10): ID 105702.
[44]	ROJAS-MARROQUIN A, LUVIANO L, HERNÁNDEZ-WONG J, et al. Application of photoacoustic spectroscopy and phase-resolved technique to the study of photoprotective pigments in golden delicious apple (Malus domestica)[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2020, 41(3): ID 32.
[45]	LIMA R J S, VASCONCELOS A S, SUASSUNA J F. Carotenoids and flavonoids identification in Brazilian tropical fruits and vegetables using photoacoustic technique[J]. Journal de physique, 2005, 125: 51-53.
[46]	LOURENÇO NETO M, AGRA K L, SUASSUNA FILHO J, et al. TDDFT calculations and photoacoustic spectroscopy experiments used to identify phenolic acid functional biomolecules in Brazilian tropical fruits in natura[J]. Spectrochimica acta part A: Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy, 2018, 193: 249-257.
[47]	BARRIENTOS-SOTELO V R, CANO-CASAS R, CRUZ-OREA A, et al. Photoacoustic characterization of green, red and dehydrated Capsicum annuum L. variety pasilla [J]. Food biophysics, 2015, 10(4): 481-486.
[48]	ZENDEJAS-LEAL B E, BARRIENTOS-SOTELO V R, CANO-CASAS R, et al. Photoacoustic monitoring of absorption spectrum during the dehydration process of pasilla chili pepper[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2018, 39(7): ID 80.
[49]	HERNAACUTE NDEZ A C, DOMIACUTE NGUEZ PACHECO F A, CRUZ OREA A, et al. Optical absorption coefficient of different tortillas by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. African journal of biotechnology, 2012, 11(92): 15916-15922.
[50]	DÓKA O, BICANIC D D, DICKO M H, et al. Photoacoustic approach to direct determination of the total phenolic content in red sorghum flours[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2004, 52(8): 2133-2136.
[51]	GORDON S H, SCHUDY R B, WHEELER B C, et al. Identification of Fourier transform infrared photoacoustic spectral features for detection of Aspergillus flavus infection in corn[J]. International journal of food microbiology, 1997, 35(2): 179-186.
[52]	LIU Q, ZHANG W, ZHANG B, et al. Determination of total protein and wet gluten in wheat flour by Fourier transform infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy with multivariate analysis[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis, 2022, 106: ID 104349 .
[53]	HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR C, CRUZ-OREA A, IVANOV R, et al. The optical absorption coefficient of maize seeds investigated by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. Food biophysics, 2011, 6(4): 481-486.
[54]	GUPTA V, KUMAR A, GARG G K, et al. Photoacoustic spectroscopy for identification and differential diagnosis of T. INDICA with other seed-borne pathogens of wheat and rice[J]. Instrumentation science & technology, 2001, 29(4): 283-293.
[55]	MOLINA R R, AGUILAR C H, PACHECO A D, et al. Alternative method to characterize corn grain by means of photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2013, 34(8): 1540-1548.
[56]	RODRÍGUEZ-PÁEZ C L, CARBALLO-CARBALLO A, RICO-MOLINA R, et al. The optical absorption coefficient of maize grains investigated by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2016, 38(1): ID 11.
[57]	SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ G, HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR C, DOMINGUEZ-PACHECO A, et al. The optical absorption coefficient of bean seeds investigated using photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2015, 36(5): 835-843.
[58]	DOMÍNGUEZ-PACHECO A, HERNÁNDEZ-AGUILAR C, CRUZ-OREA A. Photoacoustic determination of non-radiative relaxation time of absorbing centers in maize seeds[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2017, 38(7): ID 111.
[59]	PÉREZ REYES M C, HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR C, DOMINGUEZ-PACHECO A, et al. The optical absorption coefficient of barley seeds investigated by photoacoustic spectroscopy and their effects by laser biostimulation[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2015, 36(9): 2389-2400.
[60]	RICO MOLINA R, HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR C, DOMINGUEZ PACHECO A, et al. Characterization of maize grains with different pigmentation investigated by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2014, 35(9): 1933-1939.
[61]	HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR C, DOMINGUEZ PACHECO A, CRUZ OREA A, et al. Depth profiles in maize (Zea mays L.) seeds studied by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2015, 36: 891-899.
[62]	HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR C, CARBALLO A C, CRUZ-OREA A, et al. The carotenoid content in seedlings of maize seeds irradiated by a 650 nm diode laser: Qualitative photoacoustic study[J]. The European physical journal special topics, 2008, 153(1): 515-518.
[63]	HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR C, MEZZALAMA M, LOZANO N, et al. Optical absorption coefficient of laser irradiated wheat seeds determined by photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. The European physical journal special topics, 2008, 153(1): 519-522.
[64]	HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR C, DOMINGUEZ PACHECO F A, CRUZ OREA A, et al. Thermal effects of laser irradiation on maize seeds[J]. International agrophysics, 2015, 29(2): 147-156.
[65]	PACHECO A D, AGUILAR C H, OREA A C, et al. Evaluation of wheat and maize seeds by photoacoustic microscopy[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2009, 30(6): 2036-2043.
[66]	ROJAS-LIMA J E, DOMÍNGUEZ-PACHECO F A, HERNÁNDEZ-AGUILAR C, et al. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for statistical characterization of photopyroelectric signals obtained from maize seeds[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2018, 40(1): ID 4.
[67]	MEDINA-PEREZ A, DOMINGUEZ-PACHECO A, HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR C, et al. Thermal imaging using photoacoustic microscopy with different excitation wavelengths[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2019, 40(2): ID 23.
[68]	SANTOS J G, SILVEIRA L B, OLENKA L, et al. Photoacoustic investigation of copaiba oil[J]. The European physical journal special topics, 2008, 153(1): 523-526.
[69]	LU Y Z, DU C W, YU C B, et al. Determination of nitrogen in rapeseed by Fourier transform infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy and independent component analysis[J]. Analytical letters, 2015, 48(7): 1150-1162.
[70]	LUO H, YANG K Y, JI L L, et al. Photoacoustic spectroscopy combined with integrated learning to identify soybean oil with different frying durations[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(9): ID 4247.
[71]	BICANIC D, SWARTS J, LUTEROTTI S, et al. Optothermistor as a breakthrough in the quantification of lycopene content of thermally processed tomato-based foods: Verification versus absorption spectrophotometry and high-performance liquid chromatography[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2005, 53(9): 3295-3299.
[72]	DÖKA O, BICANIC D, SZÖLLÖSY L. Rapid and gross screening for Pb₃O₄ adulterant in ground sweet red paprika by means of photoacoustic spectroscopy[J]. Instrumentation science & technology, 1998, 26(2/3): 203-208.
[73]	LIU L X, WANG Y F, GAO C M, et al. Photoacoustic spectroscopy as a non-destructive tool for quantification of pesticide residue in apple cuticle[J]. International journal of thermophysics, 2015, 36(5): 868-872.
[74]	FIORANI L, ARTUSO F, GIARDINA I, et al. Photoacoustic laser system for food fraud detection[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(12): ID 4178.
[75]	OLIVEIRA V, CAETANO I, MACHADO C, et al. Photoacoustic spectroscopy and multivariate techniques: New applications to simplify the analysis of raw propolis[J]. Microchemical journal, 2023, 194: ID 109309.
[76]	SAMMARCO G, ALINOVI M, FIORANI L, et al. Oregano herb adulteration detection through rapid spectroscopic approaches: fourier transform-near infrared and laser photoacoustic spectroscopy facilities[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis, 2023, 124: ID 105672.
[77]	HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR C, DOMINGUEZ PACHECO A, VALDERRAMA BRAVO C, et al. Photoacoustic characterization of wheat bread mixed with Moringa oleifera [J]. Current research in food science, 2021, 4: 521-531.
[78]	DIAS R, VALDERRAMA P, MARÇO P, et al. Infrared-photoacoustic spectroscopy and multiproduct multivariate calibration to estimate the proportion of coffee defects in roasted samples[J]. Beverages, 2023, 9(1): ID 21.
[79]	SHARIFI F, MOJTABA N, GHASEMI M, et al. Finite element simulation and development of a LED-based photoacoustic spectroscopy system for quality assessment of some food liquids[J]. Innovative food technologies, 2022, 9(4): 383-405.
[80]	SHARIFI F, NADERI-BOLDAJI M, GHASEMI-VARNAMKHASTI M, et al. Feasibility study of detecting some milk adulterations using a LED-based Vis-SWNIR photoacoustic spectroscopy system[J]. Food chemistry, 2023, 424: ID 136411.
[81]	KHOSROSHAHI M E, PATEL Y, WOLL-MORISON V. Non-destructive assessment of milk quality using pulsed UV photoacoustic, fluorescence and near FTIR spectroscopy[J]. Laser physics letters, 2022, 19(7): ID 075602.
[82]	XU R, ADIL M Z, JABEEN S, et al. Recent advancements in chemometrics based non-destructive analytical techniques for rapid detection of adulterants in milk and dairy products: A review[J]. Food control, 2025, 174: ID 111247.
[83]	PATIMISCO P, SAMPAOLO A, DONG L, et al. Recent advances in quartz enhanced photoacoustic sensing[J]. Applied physics reviews, 2018, 5(1): ID 011106.
[84]	YANG X, CHEN B S, LIANG Y Z, et al. A review of laser-spectroscopy-based gas sensing techniques for trace formaldehyde detection[J]. Measurement, 2025, 253: ID 117656.
[85]	ZHANG C, QIAO S D, HE Y, et al. Multi-resonator T-type photoacoustic cell based photoacoustic spectroscopy gas sensor for simultaneous measurement C₂H₂, CH₄ and CO₂ [J]. Sensors and actuators B: chemical, 2025, 427: ID 137168.
[86]	MOTA L, RODRIGUES G, MIKLÓS A, et al. Enhanced selectivity and sensitivity of the first harmonic detection in a compact differential photoacoustic cell for sensing ammonia at trace levels[J]. Measurement, 2025, 244: ID 116464.
[87]	FATIMA A, KRATKIEWICZ K, MANWAR R, et al. Review of cost reduction methods in photoacoustic computed tomography[J]. Photoacoustics, 2019, 15: ID 100137.