• •
收稿日期:2026-05-12
出版日期:2026-07-23
基金项目:作者简介:杨 玉,硕士研究生,研究方向为智慧农业及装备。E-mail:2514056148@qq.com通信作者:
章 磊,硕士,实验师,研究方向为智慧农业及装备。E-mail:zhanglei@nufe.edu.cn
ZHANG YiBo1(
), MAO Bo2(
), ZHANG Lei2
Received:2026-05-12
Online:2026-07-23
Foundation items:National Key Research and Development Program of China(2024YFF1105504)
About author:YANG Yu, E-mail: 2514056148@qq.comCorresponding author:ZHANG Lei, E-mail: zhanglei@nufe.edu.cn摘要:
[目的/意义] 玉米叶片病虫害早期目标通常具有尺度小、纹理弱、背景复杂和类间差异不明显等特点,通用轻量化检测模型在田间端侧部署时难以兼顾检测精度与实时推理效率。为提高复杂田间环境下玉米叶片病虫害小目标识别能力,提出一种三点式轻量化增强框架LiteFocus-Net。 [方法] 以YOLOv11n为基线,从主干特征提取、深层细节恢复和训练损失约束三个方面进行改进。首先,设计自适应核轻量化模块(Adaptive Kernel Lightweight Block,AKL-Block),通过全局池化和门控选择机制在3×3、5×5和7×7候选深度可分离卷积核中进行输入级选择,以较低计算代价增强模型对不同尺度目标的适应能力;其次,构建特征分解重构模块(Feature Decomposition and Reconstruction,FDR),将P5深层特征划分为结构分支和细节分支,并对细节分支进行轻量化重构,以恢复小病斑边缘、虫体轮廓和孢子纹理等局部响应;最后,提出尺度感知梯度增强损失(Scale-Aware Gradient Boosting Loss,SAGB-Loss),从特征层级和目标面积两个维度对回归损失进行连续加权,提高小目标样本的训练贡献。在包含10 324张田间玉米叶片图像、8类病虫害目标的数据集上进行实验。 [结果和讨论] LiteFocus-Net在交并比阈值为0.5时的平均精度均值(mean Average Precision, mAP@0.5)达到74.97%,参数量为2.52 M,计算量为5.3 GFLOPs;与YOLOv11n相比,小目标平均精度(Average Precision for small objects,AP_s)由28.1%提升至32.77%,计算量降低15.9%。 [结论] LiteFocus-Net能够在降低计算开销的同时提升玉米叶片病虫害小目标检测性能,可在田间巡检、精准防控和农业边缘智能设备部署和应用。
中图分类号:
杨玉, 张轶博, 毛波, 章磊. LiteFocus-Net:面向玉米叶片病虫害小目标检测的三点式轻量化增强框架[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202605017.
ZHANG YiBo, MAO Bo, ZHANG Lei. LiteFocus-Net: A Three-Point Lightweight Enhancement Framework for Small-Target Detection of Corn Leaf Diseases and Pests[J]. Smart Agriculture, doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202605017.
表3
LiteFocus-Net在玉米叶片病虫害数据集上的完整消融实验及统计显著性分析
| Scheme | AKL | FDR | SAGB | mAP@0.5/% | AP_s/% | AP_m/% | AP_l/% | Params/M | 计算量/GFLOPs | 调整后p值(AP_s) | 调整后p值 (mAP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv11n Baseline | — | — | — | 72.20±0.20 | 28.10±0.50 | 55.80±0.30 | 64.30±0.20 | 2.58 | 6.3 | — | — |
| only AKL-Block | √ | — | — | 73.50±0.20 | 30.10±0.40 | 56.20±0.20 | 64.10±0.30 | 2.50 | 5.0 | 0.026 | 0.005 |
| only FDR | — | √ | — | 72.80±0.20 | 28.70±0.40 | 55.90±0.30 | 64.00±0.20 | 2.58 | 6.3 | 0.367 | 0.043 |
| only SAGB-Loss | — | — | √ | 72.70±0.20 | 28.50±0.40 | 55.90±0.30 | 64.10±0.20 | 2.58 | 6.3 | 0.367 | 0.043 |
| AKL-Block + FDR | √ | √ | — | 74.30±0.30 | 31.40±0.50 | 56.10±0.30 | 63.90±0.30 | 2.52 | 5.3 | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| AKL-Block + SAGB-Loss | √ | — | √ | 73.70±0.20 | 30.30±0.40 | 56.30±0.20 | 64.10±0.30 | 2.50 | 5.0 | 0.023 | 0.005 |
| FDR + SAGB-Loss | — | √ | √ | 73.50±0.20 | 29.20±0.50 | 56.00±0.30 | 63.80±0.20 | 2.58 | 6.3 | 0.163 | 0.005 |
| LiteFocus-Net | √ | √ | √ | 74.97±0.32 | 32.77±0.71 | 56.37±0.40 | 64.03±0.15 | 2.52 | 5.3 | 0.004 | 0.009 |
表 6
LiteFocus-Net各模块在小目标精度(AP_s)上的单独及组合增益对比
| 模块组合 | AP_s/% (均值±标准差) | 相对基线增益 | 单独增益之和 | 交互增益 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 28.10±0.50 | — | — | — |
| only AKL | 30.10±0.40 | +2.0 | — | — |
| only FDR | 28.70±0.40 | +0.6 | — | — |
| only SAGB | 28.50±0.40 | +0.4 | — | — |
| AKL + FDR | 31.40±0.50 | +3.3 | +2.6 | +0.7 (正向) |
| AKL + SAGB | 30.30±0.40 | +2.2 | +2.4 | -0.2 (轻微负向) |
| FDR + SAGB | 29.20±0.50 | +1.1 | +1.0 | +0.1 (中性) |
| AKL + FDR + SAGB | 32.77±0.71 | +4.7 | +3.0 | +1.7 (正向) |
表7
AKL-Block不同候选核集合的消融实验
| 卷积核选择方案 | mAP@0.5/% | AP_s/% | AP_m/% | AP_l/% | Params/M | 计算量/GFLOPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {3×3} | 72.80±0.20 | 29.00±0.40 | 55.90±0.30 | 63.70±0.30 | 2.47 | 4.6 |
| {3×3, 5×5} | 73.20±0.20 | 29.70±0.40 | 56.00±0.30 | 63.90±0.30 | 2.49 | 4.8 |
| {3×3, 5×5, 7×7} | 73.50±0.20 | 30.10±0.40 | 56.20±0.20 | 64.10±0.30 | 2.50 | 5.0 |
| {1×1, 3×3, 5×5, 7×7} | 73.40±0.20 | 29.90±0.40 | 56.10±0.30 | 64.00±0.30 | 2.51 | 4.9 |
| {3×3, 5×5, 7×7, 9×9} | 73.60±0.20 | 30.20±0.40 | 56.20±0.30 | 64.20±0.30 | 2.52 | 5.4 |
表8
FDR模块不同通道比例的消融实验
| 结构分支:细节分支 | 结构分支通道数 | 细节分支通道数 | mAP@0.5/% | AP_s/% | AP_m/% | AP_l/% | Params/M | 计算量/GFLOPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:1 | 128 | 128 | 74.00±0.20 | 30.80±0.40 | 56.20±0.30 | 64.10±0.30 | 2.51 | 5.2 |
| 3:5 | 96 | 160 | 74.10±0.20 | 31.10±0.40 | 56.20±0.30 | 64.00±0.30 | 2.51 | 5.2 |
| 1:3 | 64 | 192 | 74.30±0.30 | 31.40±0.50 | 56.10±0.30 | 63.90±0.30 | 2.52 | 5.3 |
| 1:7 | 32 | 224 | 74.10±0.20 | 31.50±0.50 | 55.80±0.30 | 63.60±0.30 | 2.54 | 5.4 |
表 11
固定大核、Inception、SKNet和AKL-Block骨干模块的性能与复杂度比较
| Scheme | mAP@0.5 | AP_s | AP_m | AP_l | Params/M | 计算量/GFLOPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv11n Baseline | 72.20±0.20 | 28.10±0.50 | 55.80±0.30 | 64.30±0.20 | 2.58 | 6.3 |
| C3k2-Fixed 7×7 | 72.10±0.20 | 27.60±0.40 | 55.60±0.30 | 64.50±0.30 | 2.55 | 6.8 |
| C3k2-Inception | 73.70±0.30 | 30.40±0.50 | 56.30±0.30 | 64.80±0.30 | 2.68 | 7.9 |
| C3k2-SK | 73.60±0.30 | 30.20±0.50 | 56.20±0.30 | 64.60±0.30 | 2.66 | 7.3 |
| AKL-Block (Ours) | 73.50±0.20 | 30.10±0.40 | 56.20±0.20 | 64.10±0.30 | 2.50 | 5.0 |
表 13
FDR与其他特征增强方法对比
| Scheme | mAP@0.5 | AP_s | AP_m | AP_l | Params/M | 计算量/GFLOPs | Extra Params/M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No P5 enhancement | 73.50±0.20 | 30.10±0.40 | 56.20±0.20 | 64.10±0.30 | 2.50 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Bilinear-only | 73.60±0.20 | 30.30±0.40 | 56.10±0.20 | 64.10±0.30 | 2.50 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Deconv | 74.10±0.30 | 31.00±0.50 | 56.20±0.30 | 64.00±0.30 | 2.68 | 5.6 | 0.18 |
| Full-PixelShuffle | 74.80±0.30 | 32.20±0.50 | 56.40±0.30 | 64.20±0.30 | 2.62 | 5.8 | 0.12 |
| FDR (Ours) | 74.30±0.30 | 31.40±0.50 | 56.10±0.30 | 63.90±0.30 | 2.52 | 5.3 | 0.02 |
表 15
SAGB-Loss与其他损失加权策略对比
| Loss Strategy | mAP@0.5/% | AP_s/% | AP_m/% | AP_l/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIoU (Baseline) | 74.30±0.30 | 31.40±0.50 | 56.10±0.30 | 63.90±0.30 |
| EIoU | 74.50±0.30 | 31.70±0.50 | 56.30±0.30 | 64.00±0.30 |
| EIoU + Layer-wise weighting | 74.70±0.30 | 32.20±0.50 | 56.40±0.30 | 64.00±0.30 |
| EIoU + Hard area threshold weighting | 74.60±0.30 | 32.80±0.50 | 55.80±0.30 | 63.90±0.30 |
| SAGB-Loss (Ours) | 74.97±0.32 | 32.77±0.71 | 56.37±0.40 | 64.03±0.15 |
表 17
LiteFocus-Net与现有先进模型的性能对比
| Method | mAP@0.5 | AP_s | AP_m | AP_l | Params/M | 计算量/GFLOPs | FPS/(帧/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faster R-CNN (ResNet50) | 66.9 | 19.3 | 48.2 | 60.4 | 137.10 | 370.20 | 21.0 |
| SSD (VGG16) | 72.3 | 24.5 | 53.1 | 63.8 | 26.29 | 62.74 | 41.0 |
| RT-DETR (R18)[ | 75.8 | 31.2 | 57.0 | 65.8 | 20.00 | 71.10 | 24.0 |
| YOLOv5n | 62.1 | 22.3 | 48.5 | 56.2 | 1.90 | 4.50 | 141.0 |
| YOLOv8n | 71.1 | 26.5 | 54.2 | 63.1 | 3.20 | 8.70 | 124.0 |
| YOLOv11n (Baseline) | 72.2 | 28.1 | 55.8 | 64.3 | 2.58 | 6.30 | 136.0 |
| YOLOv11s | 74.5 | 30.1 | 56.6 | 65.2 | 9.42 | 21.90 | 86.0 |
| YOLOv11m | 75.3 | 31.0 | 57.0 | 65.8 | 20.00 | 67.70 | 51.0 |
| YOLOv11l | 76.7 | 32.3 | 58.2 | 66.5 | 25.29 | 86.60 | 43.0 |
| EfficientViT[ | 73.3 | 29.5 | 55.9 | 64.8 | 3.56 | 6.90 | 128.0 |
| Gold-YOLO[ | 74.8 | 31.5 | 56.9 | 65.6 | 21.50 | 46.00 | 38.0 |
| YOLO-MS (XS)[ | 73.8 | 30.2 | 56.1 | 64.9 | 4.50 | 8.70 | 118.0 |
| YOLO-MS (S)[ | 75.6 | 32.0 | 57.2 | 66.0 | 8.10 | 15.40 | 82.0 |
| DAMO-YOLO (Tiny)[ | 73.1 | 29.0 | 55.5 | 64.5 | 6.80 | 14.10 | 95.0 |
| DAMO-YOLO(Small)[ | 74.3 | 30.6 | 56.3 | 65.2 | 11.20 | 23.40 | 68.0 |
| RTMDet-Tiny[ | 73.5 | 29.8 | 55.7 | 64.7 | 4.00 | 14.20 | 72.0 |
| RTMDet-Small[ | 74.9 | 31.2 | 56.8 | 65.3 | 8.89 | 14.80 | 68.0 |
| MobileViT-YOLO[ | 72.8 | 28.6 | 54.8 | 64.0 | 8.60 | 10.20 | 105.0 |
| EMO-YOLO[ | 73.4 | 29.7 | 55.6 | 64.5 | 5.10 | 8.50 | 122.0 |
| FasterNet-YOLO[ | 72.5 | 28.9 | 55.0 | 64.2 | 3.96 | 7.80 | 136.0 |
| YOLO-MSM[ | 74.0 | 30.2 | 55.8 | 64.5 | 5.40 | 18.50 | 69.6 |
| MA-YOLO[ | 73.9 | 32.1 | 56.8 | 65.2 | 6.42 | 17.20 | 67.2 |
| YOLO-LCE[ | 73.9 | 30.1 | 56.2 | 64.0 | 1.69 | 5.40 | 130.0 |
| LiteFocus-Net (Ours) | 75.0 | 32.8 | 56.4 | 64.0 | 2.52 | 5.30 | 135.0 |
表 19
LiteFocus-Net与YOLOv11n在RK3588和Jetson Orin上的量化推理性能及能效
| Platform | Model | Precision | Latency/ms | Power/W | Memory/MB | mAP@0.5 | Energy consumption per frame/(mJ/frame) | Energy efficiency ratio/(帧/(s·W)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RK3588 CPU | YOLOv11n | INT8 | 12.7 | 0.9 | 92 | 69.8 | 11.43 | 87.5 |
| RK3588 CPU | LiteFocus-Net | INT8 | 12.1 | 0.9 | 88 | 71.5 | 10.89 | 91.8 |
| RK3588 NPU | LiteFocus-Net | INT8 | 7.5 | 1.2 | 152 | 71.5 | 9.00 | 111.1 |
| Jetson Orin | YOLOv11n | INT8 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 124 | 69.7 | 27.03 | 37.0 |
| Jetson Orin | LiteFocus-Net | FP16 | 6.8 | 6.2 | 198 | 74.7 | 42.16 | 23.7 |
| Jetson Orin | LiteFocus-Net | INT8 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 122 | 71.5 | 23.52 | 42.5 |
表 20
LiteFocus-Net与YOLOv11n在不同复杂田间条件下的鲁棒性测试结果
| 测试条件 | 图像数/张 | 目标实例数/个 | YOLOv11n mAP@0.5/% | LiteFocus-Net mAP@0.5/% | YOLOv11n AP_s/% | LiteFocus-Net AP_s/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 全部测试集 | 2 049 | 4 827 | 72.2 | 75.0 | 28.1 | 32.8 |
| 强光条件 | 312 | 708 | 70.8 | 74.1 | 26.9 | 31.7 |
| 弱光条件 | 286 | 655 | 69.6 | 73.0 | 25.8 | 30.8 |
| 逆光条件 | 241 | 536 | 67.9 | 71.7 | 24.6 | 29.8 |
| 局部遮挡 | 354 | 812 | 68.7 | 72.6 | 25.1 | 30.4 |
| 不同拍摄角度 | 328 | 741 | 71.0 | 74.4 | 27.2 | 32.0 |
| [1] | KALUNGA P, KUNDA D. Deep learning applications in maize disease detection: a systematic review of trends, gaps, and future research[J]. Zambia ICT Journal, 2025, 9(2): 31-37. |
| [2] | GÜLMEZ B. Advancements in maize disease detection: A comprehensive review of convolutional neural networks[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 183: 109222. |
| [3] | FENG Z R, SHI R M, JIANG Y H, et al. SPD-YOLO: A method for detecting maize disease pests using improved YOLOv7[J]. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2025, 84(2): 3559-3575. |
| [4] | MENG Y, ZHAN J W, LI K S, et al. A rapid and precise algorithm for maize leaf disease detection based on YOLO MSM[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 6016. |
| [5] | NAKATUMBA-NABENDE J, MURINDANYI S. Deep learning models for enhanced in-field maize leaf disease diagnosis[J]. Machine Learning with Applications, 2025, 20: 100673. |
| [6] | KHAN Z, SHEN Y, LIU H. ObjectDetection in agriculture: A comprehensive review of methods, applications, challenges, and future directions[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(13): 1351. |
| [7] | SAPKOTA R, FLORES-CALERO M, QURESHI R, et al. YOLO advances to its genesis: A decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2025, 58(9): 274. |
| [8] | WANG C Y, YEH I H, LIAO H Y M. YOLOv9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information[C]// Computer Vision – ECCV 2024. Cham, Germany: Springer, 2025: 1-21. |
| [9] | WANG A, CHEN H, LIU L H, et al. YOLOv10: real-time end-to-end object detection[C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS), 2024: 107984-108011. |
| [10] | KHANAM R, HUSSAIN M. YOLOv11: an overview of the key architectural enhancements[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2024. |
| [11] | ZHANG X Y, ZHOU X Y, LIN M X, et al. ShuffleNet: an extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2018: 6848-6856. |
| [12] | HOWARD A G, ZHU M L, CHEN B, et al. MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2017. |
| [13] | HAN K, WANG Y H, TIAN Q, et al. GhostNet: more features from cheap operations[C]// 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2020: 1577-1586. |
| [14] | LIN T Y, DOLLAR P, GIRSHICK R, et al. Feature pyramid networks for object detection[C]// 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2017: 936-944. |
| [15] | LIU S, QI L, QIN H F, et al. Path aggregation network for instance segmentation[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2018: 8759-8768. |
| [16] | TAN M X, PANG R M, LE Q V. EfficientDet: scalable and efficient object detection[C]// 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2020: 10778-10787. |
| [17] | LIN T Y, GOYAL P, GIRSHICK R, et al. Focal loss for dense object detection[C]// 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2017: 2999-3007. |
| [18] | ZHANG H, ZHANG S J. Focaler-IoU: more focused intersection over union loss[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2024. |
| [19] | ZHANG Y F, REN W Q, ZHANG Z, et al. Focal and efficient IOU loss for accurate bounding box regression[J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 506: 146-157. |
| [20] | TONG Z J, CHEN Y H, XU Z W, et al. Wise-IoU: bounding box regression loss with dynamic focusing mechanism[PP/OL]. arXiv: , 2023. |
| [21] | ZHANG W, HU H, SUN Y Q, et al. AgriPest-YOLO: A lightweight detection network for dense small agricultural pests under complex field backgrounds[J]. Agriculture Communications, 2022, 1(1): 100017. |
| [22] | ZHENG Y, ZHENG W H, DU X. A lightweight rice pest detection algorithm based on improved YOLOv8[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 29888. |
| [23] | HUANG Y K, ZHONG Y L, ZHONG D C, et al. Pepper-YOLO: An lightweight model for green pepper detection and picking point localization in complex environments[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1508258. |
| [24] | LU Y Z, LIU P F, TAN C. MA-YOLO: A pest target detection algorithm with multi-scale fusion and attention mechanism[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(7): 1549. |
| [25] | CEN X Y, LU S L, QIAN T T. YOLO-LCE: A lightweight YOLOv8 model for agricultural pest detection[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(9): 2022. |
| [26] | YANG H, SHENG S Y, JIANG F, et al. YOLO-SDW: A method for detecting infection in corn leaves[J]. Energy Reports, 2024, 12: 6102-6111. |
| [27] | JANG E, GU S X, POOLE B. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax[PP/OL]. arXiv: 1611.01144, 2017. |
| [28] | HU J, SHEN L, SUN G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2018: 7132-7141. |
| [29] | SHI W Z, CABALLERO J, HUSZAR F, et al. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network[C]// 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1874-1883. |
| [30] | ZHAO Y A, LV W Y, XU S L, et al. DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection[C]// 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2024: 16965-16974. |
| [31] | CAI H, LI J Y, HU M Y, et al. EfficientViT: Lightweight multi-scale attention for high-resolution dense prediction[C]// 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2023: 17256-17267. |
| [32] | WANG C C, HE W, NIE Y, et al. Gold-YOLO: efficient object detector via gather-and-distribute mechanism[C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS), 2023: 51094-51112. |
| [33] | CHEN Y M, YUAN X B, WANG J B, et al. YOLO-MS: Rethinking multi-scale representation learning for real-time object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025, 47(6): 4240-4252. |
| [34] | XU X Z, JIANG Y Q, CHEN W H, et al. DAMO-YOLO: A report on real-time object detection design[PP/OL]. arXiv:, 2022. |
| [35] | LYU C Q, ZHANG W W, HUANG H A, et al. RTMDet: An empirical study of designing real-time object detectors[PP/OL]. arXiv.2212.07784, 2022. |
| [36] | MEHTA S, RASTEGARI M. MobileViT: Light-weight, general-purpose, and mobile-friendly vision transformer[PP/OL] arXiv: , 2021. |
| [37] | ZHANG J N, LI X T, LI J, et al. Rethinking mobile block for efficient attention-based models[C]// 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2023: 1389-1400. |
| [38] | CHEN J R, KAO S H, HE H, et al. Run, don't walk: chasing higher FLOPS for faster neural networks[C]// 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE, 2023: 12021-12031. |
| [1] | 苏玉杰, 李玥, 魏霖静, 吴兵, 郭林海, 剡斌, 周慧, 高玉红, 康亮河, 刘欢, 苏舜昌. 基于轻量化改进YOLOv11n-Seg的胡麻倒伏区域识别方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(2): 35-47. |
| [2] | 张文博, 江一珏, 宋巍, 贺琪, 张文博. CAGE-YOLO: 基于遥感影像的水产养殖网箱高密度小目标检测模型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(2): 98-117. |
| [3] | 刘浩然, 王宇, 赵学观, 吴华瑞, 付豪, 庞树杰, 翟长远. CD-YOLO:基于改进YOLOv11s的田间胡萝卜苗检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(2): 158-174. |
| [4] | 李澳强, 戴航宇, 郭亚. 基于双目视觉和改进YOLOv11-pose的河蟹水下原位质量估测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(1): 192-202. |
| [5] | 姚晓通, 曲绍业. 基于改进YOLOv12s的辣椒叶片病虫害轻量化检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(1): 1-14. |
| [6] | 武张斌, 何宁, 吴延东, 郭新宇, 温维亮. 点云数据驱动的玉米叶片生物量估算方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(1): 156-166. |
| [7] | 曹玉莹, 刘银川, 高新悦, 贾银江, 董守田. LightTassel-YOLO:一种基于无人机遥感的玉米雄穗实时检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(6): 96-110. |
| [8] | 赵峻, 聂志刚, 李广, 刘佳宇. 基于无人机低空近景图像的玉米螟虫害检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(6): 111-123. |
| [9] | 党珊珊, 乔世成, 白明宇, 张明月, 赵晨雨, 潘春宇, 王国忱. 基于DCC-YOLOv10n的玉米叶片病害小目标检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(5): 124-135. |
| [10] | 韩文凯, 李涛, 冯青春, 陈立平. 面向复杂果园环境的改进YOLOv11n苹果轻量化实例分割算法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(5): 114-123. |
| [11] | 李汶政, 杨信廷, 孙传恒, 崔腾鹏, 王慧, 李珊珊, 李文勇. 联合空间深度转换卷积与多尺度注意力机制的灯诱稻飞虱害虫检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(5): 169-181. |
| [12] | 杨启良, 禹璐, 梁嘉平. 基于改进YOLOv11的采后芦笋分级检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(4): 84-94. |
| [13] | 谢纪元, 张东彦, 牛圳, 程涛, 苑峰, 刘亚玲. 基于YOLOv10-MHSA的“三北”工程内蒙古地区植树位点精准检测研究[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(3): 108-119. |
| [14] | 常戬, 王冰冰, 尹龙, 李燕青, 李兆歆, 李壮. 基于YOLOv10n-CHL的蜜蜂授粉轻量化识别模型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(3): 185-198. |
| [15] | 常戬, 王冰冰, 尹龙, 李燕青, 李兆歆, 李壮. 基于YOLOv10n-CHL轻量化的蜜蜂授粉识别模型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2025, 7(3): 1-14. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||