Smart Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4): 192-203.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202511007
• Information Processing and Decision Making • Previous Articles
WU Mingqing1,2,3, LI Weikang1,2,3, WANG Jing1,2,3, LI Jing1,2,3, PEI Rentao1, HUANG Haitao1,2, QIU Huanghuang1,2, LEI Chujing1,2, ZHAO Duo1, HUANG Jingtao4, GAO Zhiyong1,2,3,5(
)
Received:2025-11-09
Online:2026-07-30
Foundation items:Yunnan Province Agricultural Fundamental Research Joint Special Project(202301BD070001-181); National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFD1901203)
About author:WU Mingqing, E-mail: Wmqing1015@163.com;
LI Weikang E-mail: liw1328131531@163.com
corresponding author:
CLC Number:
WU Mingqing, LI Weikang, WANG Jing, LI Jing, PEI Rentao, HUANG Haitao, QIU Huanghuang, LEI Chujing, ZHAO Duo, HUANG Jingtao, GAO Zhiyong. Estimation of Citrus Transpiration in a Savanna Valley Based on Feature Selection and Optimization Algorithms[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2026, 8(4): 192-203.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.smartag.net.cn/EN/10.12133/j.smartag.SA202511007
Table 1
Hyperparameter search space for different models and optimization algorithms
| 模型及优化算法 | 参数名称 | 参数空间 | 优化算法 | 参数名称 | 参数设置 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | n_estimators max_depth min_samples_split | (10, 500) (2, 10) (2, 10) | BO | n_trials n_startup_trials | 100 20 |
| SVR | kernel c epsilon gamma | (rbf,linear,sigmoid) (0.1, 100.0) (0.01, 0.3) (0.01, 1.0) | PSO | swarm_size max_iter w c1/c2 | 50 100 0.6 1.7/1.7 |
| XGB | n_estimators max_depth learning_rate min_child_weight | (10, 500) (2,10) (1e-3, 3e-1) (1, 8) | ASHA | n_trials step HyperbandPruner | 40 (1, 10) (min_=1;max=500, reduction_factor=2) |
Table 2
Performance of original and optimized RF, SVR, and XGB models for citrus transpiration prediction on the training set
| 模型 | R 2 | MAE/(mm/d) | RMSE/(mm/d) | T stat | U 95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | 0.88 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.58 |
| RF-PSO | 0.95 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| RF-BO | 0.97 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.31 |
| RF-ASHA | 0.97 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.29 |
| SVR | 0.80 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 1.61 | 0.74 |
| SVR-PSO | 0.80 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 1.65 | 0.74 |
| SVR-BO | 0.81 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 1.73 | 0.73 |
| SVR-ASHA | 0.81 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 1.05 | 0.74 |
| XGB | 0.88 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.57 |
| XGB-PSO | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| XGB-BO | 0.99 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| XGB-ASHA | 0.99 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.48 |
Table 3
Performance of original and optimized RF, SVR, and XGB models for citrus transpiration prediction on the test set
| 模型 | R2 | MAE/(mm/d) | RMSE/(mm/d) | T stat | U 95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | 0.77 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.87 | 0.83 |
| RF-PSO | 0.84 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.61 | 0.70 |
| RF-BO | 0.86 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| RF-ASHA | 0.89 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.95 | 0.57 |
| SVR | 0.79 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 1.52 | 0.79 |
| SVR-PSO | 0.79 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 1.44 | 0.79 |
| SVR-BO | 0.80 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 1.26 | 0.77 |
| SVR-ASHA | 0.79 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 1.14 | 0.79 |
| XGB | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.72 | 0.80 |
| XGB-PSO | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
| XGB-BO | 0.84 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
| XGB-ASHA | 0.91 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.52 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
张菊, 江朝晖, 李博, 等. 基于热扩散探针的便携式植物液流监测仪研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(7): 237-243.
|
|
|
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
张宇, 赵春江, 林森, 等. 基于Penman-Monteith模型和路径排序算法相结合的草莓灌溉方法与验证[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2021, 3(3): 116-128.
|
|
|
|
| [13] |
高冠龙, 冯起, 刘贤德. 基于改进的双源模型模拟荒漠河岸胡杨林蒸散发[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3462-3472.
|
|
|
|
| [14] |
桂泽春, 赵思健. 人工智能在农业风险管理中的应用研究综述[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(1): 82-98.
|
|
|
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
陈绍民, 李晓丽, 杨启良, 等. 基于机器学习的遮荫设施内参考作物蒸散量估算[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(11): 108-116.
|
|
|
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
商志根, 段小汇. 基于PSO与LS-SVM的作物需水量预测[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2018(10): 44-47.
|
|
|
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
张晶莹, 陈滇豫, 马永胜, 等. 基于贝叶斯分析的干热河谷区橙子林冠层蒸腾耗水模拟[J]. 农业机械学报, 2024, 55(1): 305-315.
|
|
|
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||