LI Chuanmeng, YANG Jie(
), ZHANG Xiaoyu
Received:2025-12-08
Online:2026-03-13
Foundation items:The 2025 YS Third-Tier Talent Support Program(09900/990025166); The Scientific Research Fund of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education(0111723084)
About author:LI Chuanmeng, E-mail: 1817841280@qq.com.
corresponding author:
CLC Number:
LI Chuanmeng, YANG Jie, ZHANG Xiaoyu. Lightweight Detection Method for Grading Fresh Cut Dianthus caryophyllus L. Based on Flor-YOLO[J]. Smart Agriculture, doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202512007.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.smartag.net.cn/EN/10.12133/j.smartag.SA202512007
Table 1
Grading standards for the flowering index of standard cut Dianthus caryophyllus L.
| 开花指数/度 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 1 | 花瓣从萼片中伸出约0.5 cm,花朵顶部呈“星形”。此阶段采收,开花指数过小,除非有强力的促进花蕾开放的技术措施,否则切花不易开放或开放不好,为不适宜采收时期 |
| 2 | 花瓣从萼片中伸出约1 cm,且花瓣直立。适宜夏秋季远距离运输销售 |
| 3 | 花瓣开始散开,但中心较紧实。适宜冬春季远距离运输销售 |
| 4 | 花瓣更松散些,且外瓣展开度小于水平线。适宜冬春季近距离运输销售 |
| 5 | 花瓣全面松散,外瓣展开度呈水平。此阶段花过于成熟,不宜采收;若采收应尽快销售 |
Table3
Ablation study results of backbone network reconstruction
| 模型 | R/% | F 1/% | P/% | mAP@50/% | mAP@50~95/% | 参数量/M | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | 推理速度/(f/s) | 模型大小/M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLO11n | 93.13 | 91.22 | 89.52 | 92.85 | 74.74 | 2.58 | 6.3 | 275.00 | 5.2 |
| YOLO11n+R | 92.00 | 92.33 | 92.22 | 92.87 | 75.67 | 2.58 | 1.7 | 269.42 | 5.3 |
| YOLO11n+P | 94.98 | 91.86 | 89.39 | 93.94 | 74.87 | 2.40 | 5.9 | 330.13 | 4.9 |
| YOLO11n+RC | 95.82 | 92.33 | 89.23 | 95.01 | 76.38 | 2.18 | 6.0 | 298.09 | 4.5 |
| YOLO11n+P+RC | 92.19 | 92.82 | 93.71 | 94.37 | 76.51 | 2.00 | 5.6 | 270.06 | 4.1 |
| YOLO11n+R+RC | 90.63 | 91.90 | 88.69 | 94.95 | 75.95 | 2.18 | 1.6 | 507.18 | 4.5 |
| LiteChimeraNet | 90.76 | 92.18 | 93.92 | 95.04 | 76.13 | 2.00 | 1.5 | 521.60 | 4.1 |
Table 4
Performance comparison of mainstream lightweight backbone networks
| 模型 | R/% | F 1/% | P/% | mAP@50/% | mAP@50~95/% | 参数量/M | FLOPs/G | 推理速度/(f/s) | 模型大小/M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLO11n | 93.13 | 91.22 | 89.52 | 92.85 | 74.74 | 2.58 | 6.3 | 275.00 | 5.2 |
| YOLO11n+Revcol | 89.94 | 91.50 | 93.20 | 93.70 | 74.28 | 2.09 | 4.9 | 267.74 | 4.5 |
| YOLO11n+StarNet | 90.28 | 87.97 | 85.97 | 91.22 | 72.06 | 1.94 | 5.0 | 226.76 | 4.0 |
| YOLO11n+HGNetV2 | 92.05 | 91.01 | 90.10 | 92.30 | 73.70 | 2.14 | 5.7 | 273.08 | 4.5 |
| YOLO11n+LiteChimeraNet | 90.76 | 92.18 | 93.92 | 95.04 | 76.13 | 2.00 | 1.5 | 521.60 | 4.1 |
Table 5
Ablation study of Flor-YOLO
| 模型 | R% | F 1/% | P/% | mAP@50/% | mAP@50~95/% | 参数量/M | FLOPs/G | 推理速度/(f/s) | 模型大小/M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLO11n | 93.13 | 91.22 | 89.52 | 92.85 | 74.74 | 2.58 | 6.3 | 275.00 | 5.2 |
| YOLO+L | 90.76 | 92.18 | 93.92 | 95.04 | 76.13 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 521.60 | 4.1 |
| YOLO+W | 91.89 | 92.03 | 92.18 | 94.64 | 76.11 | 2.17 | 5.4 | 282.99 | 4.4 |
| YOLO+S | 94.38 | 89.85 | 94.25 | 92.80 | 74.70 | 2.26 | 6.0 | 304.81 | 5.0 |
| YOLO+W+S | 93.88 | 92.72 | 91.88 | 93.66 | 74.71 | 2.26 | 6.2 | 265.55 | 5.0 |
| YOLO+L+W | 93.77 | 93.28 | 92.85 | 95.74 | 76.26 | 1.58 | 1.2 | 431.60 | 3.3 |
| YOLO+L+S | 92.75 | 91.95 | 93.39 | 95.14 | 76.10 | 1.32 | 1.2 | 519.75 | 3.2 |
| YOLO+L+W+S(Flor-YOLO) | 94.47 | 93.69 | 93.04 | 96.10 | 76.24 | 1.26 | 1.1 | 616.09 | 3.0 |
Table 6
Comparative performance of representative lightweight object detection models for Dianthus caryophyllus L. openness detection under unified experimental settings
| 模型 | R/% | F 1/% | P/% | mAP@50 | mAP@50~95/% | 参数量/M | FLOPs/G | 推理速度/(f/s) | 模型大小/M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOV5n | 88.58 | 88.42 | 88.44 | 92.08 | 73.50 | 2.50 | 7.1 | 292.82 | 5.1 |
| YOLOV8n | 91.63 | 87.47 | 84.58 | 92.05 | 74.29 | 3.00 | 8.1 | 304.19 | 6.0 |
| YOLOV9t | 94.65 | 91.41 | 88.98 | 92.68 | 73.72 | 1.97 | 7.6 | 254.52 | 4.4 |
| YOLOV10n | 91.04 | 91.26 | 91.59 | 92.66 | 75.4 | 2.27 | 6.5 | 266.51 | 5.5 |
| YOLO11n | 93.13 | 91.22 | 89.52 | 92.85 | 74.74 | 2.58 | 6.3 | 275.00 | 5.2 |
| YOLO12n | 93.52 | 91.12 | 89.00 | 92.69 | 75.02 | 2.56 | 6.3 | 228.42 | 5.3 |
| Nanodet-m | 73.20 | 81.17 | 89.10 | 91.10 | 60.90 | 0.93 | 1.4 | 116.94 | 3.6 |
| hyper-yolot | 92.62 | 90.73 | 89.55 | 92.56 | 74.16 | 3.62 | 7.7 | 215.15 | 5.4 |
| Flor-YOLO | 94.47 | 93.69 | 93.04 | 96.10 | 76.24 | 1.26 | 1.1 | 616.09 | 3.0 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
顾仲阳. 我国种苗花卉企业年产值超5200亿元 云南鲜切花国内市场占有率达70%[EB/OL].中国政府网, 2025-03-05[2026-02-22].
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
云南省农业农村厅. 云南省花卉产业发展报告[R]. 昆明: 云南省农业农村厅,2022.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
肖瑞宏, 谭立新, 王日凤, 等. 基于改进YOLOv11n的多尺度茶叶病害检测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(1): 62-71.
|
|
|
|
| [10] |
王雪, 高雅, 陶桂香, 等. 基于CBLP-YOLO 11n的无人机稻穗轻量化检测方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2025, 56(11): 461-470.
|
|
|
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
张玉玉, 邴树营, 纪元浩, 等. 基于改进YOLOv8s的玫瑰鲜切花分级方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 118-127.
|
|
|
|
| [14] |
钱晔, 陈江权, 李兆文, 等. 基于多重注意力协同优化的鲜切花等级分类模型[J/OL]. 南京农业大学学报. (2025-09-08)[2025-12-01].
|
|
|
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 香石竹切花等级: GB/T 41202—2021 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
|
|
State Administration for Market Regulation; Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Grade of cut carnation: GB/T 41202—2021 [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021.
|
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [1] | GAO Guangfu, WANG Qilei, SONG Liwen, FENG Haikuan, SHI Lei, YANG Hao, LIU Yang, YUE Jibo. Object Detection Method of Maize Ears Within Canopy Based on CornYOLO [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2026, 8(1): 167-177. |
| [2] | XIAO Ruihong, TAN Lixin, WANG Rifeng, SONG Min, HU Chengxi. Multi-Scale Tea Leaf Disease Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOv11n [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2026, 8(1): 62-71. |
| [3] | YAO Xiaotong, QU Shaoye. Lightweight Detection Method for Pepper Leaf Diseases and Pests Based on Improved YOLOv12s [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2026, 8(1): 1-14. |
| [4] | ZHAO Jun, NIE Zhigang, LI Guang, LIU Jiayu. Corn Borer Pests Infestations Detection Method Using Low-Altitude Close-Range UAV Imagery [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(6): 111-123. |
| [5] | HAN Wenkai, LI Tao, FENG Qingchun, CHEN Liping. Lightweight Apple Instance Segmentation Algorithm Based on SSW-YOLOv11n for Complex Orchard Environments [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(5): 114-123. |
| [6] | WANG Fengyun, WANG Xuanyu, AN Lei, FENG Wenjie. Detection Method for Log-Cultivated Shiitake Mushrooms Based on Improved RT-DETR [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(5): 67-77. |
| [7] | LUO Xuelun, GOUDA Mostafa, SONG Xinbei, HU Yan, ZHANG Wenkai, HE Yong, ZHANG Jin, LI Xiaoli. Detection Method of Ectropis Grisescens Larvae in Canopy Environments Based on YOLO and Diffusion Models [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(5): 156-168. |
| [8] | YANG Qilang, YU Lu, LIANG Jiaping. Grading Asparagus officinalis L. Using Improved YOLOv11 [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(4): 84-94. |
| [9] | CHANG Jian, WANG Bingbing, YIN Long, LI Yanqing, LI Zhaoxin, LI Zhuang. The Lightweight Bee Pollination Recognition Model Based On YOLOv10n-CHL [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(3): 185-198. |
| [10] | WU Liuai, XU Xueke. Lightweight Tomato Leaf Disease and Pest Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOv10n [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(1): 146-155. |
| [11] | YANG Xinting, HU Huan, CHEN Xiao, LI Wenzheng, ZHOU Zijie, LI Wenyong. Lightweight Detection and Recognition Model for Small Target Pests on Sticky Traps in Multi-Source Scenarios [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2025, 7(1): 111-123. |
| [12] | LIU Chang, SUN Yu, YANG Jing, WANG Fengchao, CHEN Jin. Grape Recognition and Localization Method Based on 3C-YOLOv8n and Depth Camera [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(6): 121-131. |
| [13] | HU Chengxi, TAN Lixin, WANG Wenyin, SONG Min. Lightweight Tea Shoot Picking Point Recognition Model Based on Improved DeepLabV3+ [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(5): 119-127. |
| [14] | YE Dapeng, JING Jun, ZHANG Zhide, LI Huihuang, WU Haoyu, XIE Limin. MSH-YOLOv8: Mushroom Small Object Detection Method with Scale Reconstruction and Fusion [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(5): 139-152. |
| [15] | LIU Yi, ZHANG Yanjun. ReluformerN: Lightweight High-Low Frequency Enhanced for Hyperspectral Agricultural Lancover Classification [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(5): 74-87. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||