SU Yujie1(
), LI Yue1,2(
), WEI Linjing1, WU Bing2,3, GUO Linhai1, YAN Bin2,4, ZHOU Hui1, GAO Yuhong2,4, KANG Lianghe1, LIU Huan1, SU Shunchang1
Received:2025-08-14
Online:2025-11-14
Foundation items:National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Projects(32460443); Key Project of Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Plan-Natural Science Foundation(23JRRA1403); National Foreign Experts Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology(G2022042005L); Industry Support Project of Higher Education Institutions in Gansu Province(2023CYZC-54); Key R&D Program of Gansu Province(23YFWA0013); High-Level Foreign Experts Recruitment Program of Gansu Province(25RCKA015); National Technology System for Specialty Oil Crops(CARS-14-1-16)
corresponding author:
CLC Number:
SU Yujie, LI Yue, WEI Linjing, WU Bing, GUO Linhai, YAN Bin, ZHOU Hui, GAO Yuhong, KANG Lianghe, LIU Huan, SU Shunchang. Lodging Region Detection in Flax Based on a Lightweight Improved YOLOv11n-seg Model[J]. Smart Agriculture, doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202508013.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.smartag.net.cn/EN/10.12133/j.smartag.SA202508013
Table 2
Ablation experiment results of the improved model for flax lodging recognition
| 模型 | P/% | R/% | mAP@0.5/% | Boundary IoU | 参数量/M | 计算量/GFLOPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 88.9 | 86.2 | 93.1 | 80.3 | 2.83 | 10.2 |
| C3k2_SDW | 89.8 | 87.6 | 93.0 | 79.8 | 2.14 | 8.1 |
| C3k2_SDW+BiFPN | 90.1 | 91.5 | 93.8 | 81.0 | 1.68 | 7.7 |
| Improved Model | 92.6 | 92.0 | 95.2 | 82.3 | 1.73 | 8.0 |
Table 3
Comparative experimental results of different models for flax lodging recognition
| 模型 | P/% | R/% | mAP@0.5/% | Boundary IoU | 参数量/M | 计算量/GFLOPs | 模型体积/Mb | 推理帧率/FPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLACT | 56.8 | 59.6 | 60.3 | 65.5 | 9.38 | 35.0 | 37.5 | 38.1 |
| YOLOv7-seg | 95.1 | 93.0 | 95.0 | 83.9 | 37.84 | 141.9 | 73.0 | 87.31 |
| YOLOv8n-seg | 92.2 | 87.2 | 93.4 | 78.5 | 3.26 | 12.0 | 6.8 | 111.18 |
| YOLOv11n-seg | 88.9 | 86.2 | 93.1 | 80.3 | 2.83 | 10.2 | 6.0 | 98.72 |
| Improved Model | 92.6 | 92.0 | 95.2 | 82.3 | 1.73 | 8.0 | 3.8 | 119.2 |
Table 6
Comparative experimental results of the improved model on different datasets
| 类别 | Precision/% | Recall/% | mAP@0.5/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv11n-seg | Improved Model | 提升/个百分点 | YOLOv11n-seg | Improved Model | 提升/个百分点 | YOLOv11n-seg | Improved Model | 提升/个百分点 | |
| 全部 | 69.2 | 73.5 | 4.3 | 56.2 | 58.1 | 1.9 | 61.6 | 64.2 | 2.6 |
| 裸地 | 88.5 | 92.3 | 3.8 | 61.3 | 61.1 | -0.2 | 68.9 | 69.3 | 0.4 |
| 土壤 | 80 | 87.3 | 7.3 | 88.4 | 89.3 | 0.9 | 92.3 | 94.1 | 1.8 |
| 蚕豆 Vicia faba L. | 67 | 71.5 | 4.5 | 64.3 | 64.3 | 0 | 66.6 | 64.8 | -1.8 |
| 黑麦草 Lolium perenne L. | 83.1 | 86.9 | 3.8 | 82.9 | 84.1 | 1.2 | 89.6 | 91 | 1.4 |
| 红根苋 Amaranthus tricolor L. | 85 | 87.5 | 2.5 | 86.7 | 89.2 | 2.5 | 89.6 | 92 | 2.4 |
| 荞麦 Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. | 90.8 | 92.2 | 1.4 | 84 | 84.2 | 0.2 | 86.7 | 87.4 | 0.7 |
| 豌豆 Pisum sativum L. | 44.9 | 48.2 | 3.3 | 15 | 12.5 | -2.5 | 15.3 | 16.2 | 0.9 |
| 红指草 Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. | 77.8 | 75.6 | -2.2 | 38.8 | 50 | 11.2 | 49.2 | 55.4 | 6.2 |
| 野燕麦 Avena fatua L. | 68.1 | 73.5 | 5.4 | 53.8 | 55.4 | 1.6 | 59.7 | 63.6 | 3.9 |
| 矢车菊 Centaurea cyanus L. | 68.2 | 76.5 | 8.3 | 64.9 | 68 | 3.1 | 69.7 | 75.4 | 5.7 |
| 麦仙翁 Agrostemma githago L. | 88.8 | 86.3 | -2.5 | 82.6 | 78.3 | -4.3 | 88.2 | 84.9 | -3.3 |
| 玉米 Zea mays L. | 77.2 | 77.8 | 0.6 | 88.2 | 89.5 | 1.3 | 88.7 | 91.3 | 2.6 |
| 奶蓟 Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. | 68.2 | 72 | 3.8 | 34.9 | 41.1 | 6.2 | 41.7 | 53 | 11.3 |
| 玉米草 Setaria viridis | 14.9 | 13.8 | -1.1 | 10.5 | 5.26 | -5.24 | 12 | 10.4 | -1.6 |
| 大豆 Glycine max (L.) Merr. | 59.6 | 67.9 | 8.3 | 72.8 | 84.7 | 11.9 | 77.6 | 85.4 | 7.8 |
| 向日葵 Helianthus annuus L. | 61.3 | 84.8 | 23.5 | 12.8 | 14.4 | 1.6 | 23 | 30.5 | 7.5 |
| 车前草 Plantago lanceolata L. | 44 | 46.6 | 2.6 | 14.1 | 17.1 | 3 | 24.6 | 25 | 0.4 |
| 小花天竺葵 Geranium pusillum L. | 78.5 | 81.8 | 3.3 | 55 | 58.2 | 3.2 | 64.5 | 66.6 | 2.1 |
| [1] |
邓欣, 陈信波, 邱财生, 等. 我国亚麻种质资源研究与利用概述[J]. 中国麻业科学, 2015, 37(6): 322-329.
|
|
|
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
王炜, 陈军, 叶春雷, 等. 甘肃胡麻地方及育成品种农艺性状分析及评价[J]. 中国种业, 2022(12): 75-81.
|
|
|
|
| [4] |
张瑞兰, 武万里, 王淑丽, 等. 气候变化条件下宁南山区旱地胡麻土壤水分变化特征及对发育期和产量的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(21): 69-72.
|
|
|
|
| [5] |
刘玄, 董宏伟, 高玉红, 等. 不同供钾水平下胡麻木质素代谢及其抗倒伏特性研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(5): 821-832.
|
|
|
|
| [6] |
张明. 胡麻生育时期界定标准探讨[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2018(3): 9-14.
|
|
|
|
| [7] |
李政升, 麻丽娟, 董宏伟, 等. 钾肥用量对不同品种旱地胡麻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(23): 69-76.
|
|
|
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
梁美静, 毛克彪, 郭中华, 等. 深度学习在农业领域的研究与应用[J]. 农业工程, 2024, 14(1): 30-36.
|
|
|
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
张淦, 严海峰, 胡根生, 等. 基于深度学习语义分割和迁移学习策略的麦田倒伏面积识别方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 75-85.
|
|
|
|
| [14] |
龙佳宁, 张昭, 刘晓航, 等. 利用改进EfficientNetV2和无人机图像检测小麦倒伏类型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 62-74.
|
|
|
|
| [15] |
杨蜀秦, 王鹏飞, 王帅, 等. 基于MHSA+DeepLab v3+的无人机遥感影像小麦倒伏检测[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(8): 213-219, 239.
|
|
|
|
| [16] |
翟肇裕, 张梓涵, 徐焕良, 等. YOLO算法在动植物表型研究中应用综述[J]. 农业机械学报, 2024, 55(11): 1-20.
|
|
|
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
张姝瑾, 许兴时, 邓洪兴, 等. 基于YOLO v8n-seg-FCA-BiFPN的奶牛身体分割方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2024, 55(3): 282-289, 391.
|
|
|
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
WOO S,
|
| [26] |
任长忠, 杨才. 中国燕麦品种志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2018: 23.
|
|
|
|
| [27] |
高珍妮, 郭丽琢, 李丽, 等. 氮肥对胡麻茎秆木质素合成酶活性及其抗倒性的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2014, 36(5): 610-615.
|
|
|
|
| [28] |
|
| [1] | LU Bibo, LIANG Di, YANG Jie, SONG Aiqing, HUANGFU Shangwei. Image Segmentation Method of Chinese Yam Leaves in Complex Background Based on Improved ENet [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(6): 109-120. |
| [2] | HU Chengxi, TAN Lixin, WANG Wenyin, SONG Min. Lightweight Tea Shoot Picking Point Recognition Model Based on Improved DeepLabV3+ [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(5): 119-127. |
| [3] | PANG Chunhui, CHEN Peng, XIA Yi, ZHANG Jun, WANG Bing, ZOU Yan, CHEN Tianjiao, KANG Chenrui, LIANG Dong. HI-FPN: A Hierarchical Interactive Feature Pyramid Network for Accurate Wheat Lodging Localization Across Multiple Growth Periods [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(2): 128-139. |
| [4] | YANG Feng, YAO Xiaotong. Lightweighted Wheat Leaf Diseases and Pests Detection Model Based on Improved YOLOv8 [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(1): 147-157. |
| [5] | MAO Yongwen, HAN Junying, LIU Chengzhong. Automated Flax Seeds Testing Methods Based on Machine Vision [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2024, 6(1): 135-146. |
| [6] | ZHANG Gan, YAN Haifeng, HU Gensheng, ZHANG Dongyan, CHENG Tao, PAN Zhenggao, XU Haifeng, SHEN Shuhao, ZHU Keyu. Identification Method of Wheat Field Lodging Area Based on Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation and Transfer Learning [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023, 5(3): 75-85. |
| [7] | TANG Hui, WANG Ming, YU Qiushi, ZHANG Jiaxi, LIU Liantao, WANG Nan. Root Image Segmentation Method Based on Improved UNet and Transfer Learning [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023, 5(3): 96-109. |
| [8] | XIA Xue, CHAI Xiujuan, ZHANG Ning, ZHOU Shuo, SUN Qixin, SUN Tan. A Lightweight Fruit Load Estimation Model for Edge Computing Equipment [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023, 5(2): 1-12. |
| [9] | ZHAO Yu, REN Yiping, PIAO Xinru, ZHENG Danyang, LI Dongming. Lightweight Intelligent Recognition of Saposhnikovia Divaricata (Turcz.) Schischk Originality Based on Improved ShuffleNet V2 [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2023, 5(2): 104-114. |
| [10] | XIA Ye, LEI Xiaohui, QI Yannan, XU Tao, YUAN Quanchun, PAN Jian, JIANG Saike, LYU Xiaolan. Detection of Pear Inflorescence Based on Improved Ghost-YOLOv5s-BiFPN Algorithm [J]. Smart Agriculture, 2022, 4(3): 108-119. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||