基于高光谱数据的玉米叶面积指数和生物量评估

doi:10.12133/j.smartag.2021.3.1.202102-SA004

Smart Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1): 29-39.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.2021.3.1.202102-SA004

• 专题--作物表型前沿技术与应用 • 上一篇下一篇

基于高光谱数据的玉米叶面积指数和生物量评估

束美艳¹(), 陈向阳², 王喜庆²(), 马韫韬¹()

^1.中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院，北京 100193
^2.中国农业大学生物学院，北京 100193

收稿日期:2021-01-28 修回日期:2021-03-11 出版日期:2021-03-30
基金项目:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0300202);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(2019ZD024)
作者简介:束美艳（1993－），女，博士研究生，研究方向为数字农业。E-mail：2448858578@qq.com。
通信作者:
1. 马韫韬（1977－），女，博士，副教授，研究方向为数字农业。电话：010-62733596。E-mail：yuntao.ma@cau.edu.cn;

2. 王喜庆（1969－），男，博士，教授，研究方向为表型组技术。电话：010-62733596。E-mail：wangxq21@cau.edu.cn

Estimation of Maize Leaf Area Index and Aboveground Biomass Based on Hyperspectral Data

SHU Meiyan¹(), CHEN Xiangyang², WANG Xiqing²(), MA Yuntao¹()

^1.College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
^2.College of Biological Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2021-01-28 Revised:2021-03-11 Online:2021-03-30
Foundation items:National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0300202);Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Major Project (2019ZD024)
About author:SHU Meiyan, E-mail：2448858578@qq.com
Corresponding author:
1. MA Yuntao, E-mail：yuntao.ma@cau.edu.cn;

2. WANG Xiqing, E-mail：wangxq21@cau.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用高光谱技术获取玉米农学参数信息，有助于提升玉米精准管理水平。本研究基于3个种植密度和5份玉米材料的田间试验，获取玉米大喇叭口期的地面ASD高光谱数据与无人机高光谱影像，分析不同种植密度下不同遗传材料的叶面积指数（LAI）和单株地上部生物量，构建基于全波段、敏感波段和植被指数的LAI和单株地上部生物量高光谱估算模型，比较分析两类高光谱数据在玉米表型性状参数上的监测能力。结果表明，野生型玉米材料的冠层光谱反射率在近红外波段随着种植密度的增大而增大；同一种植密度下的野生型玉米材料的光谱反射率在可见光和近红外波段均为最低。在可见光波段550 nm的波峰处，4种转基因材料的光谱反射率比野生型玉米材料的光谱反射率提高4.52%~19.9%，在近红外波段870 nm的波峰处，4种转基因材料的光谱反射率比野生型玉米材料的光谱反射率提高23.64%~57.05%。基于21个高光谱植被指数构建的模型对LAI的估算效果最好，测试集决定系数R²为0.70，均方根误差RMSE为0.92，相对均方根误差rRMSE为15.94%。敏感波段反射率（839~893 nm和1336~1348 nm）对玉米单株地上部生物量估算效果最佳，测试集R²为0.71，RMSE为12.31 g，rRMSE为15.89%。综上，田间非成像高光谱和无人机成像高光谱在玉米LAI及生物量估算方面具有较好的一致性，能够快速有效地提取地块尺度玉米农学参数信息，本研究可为高光谱技术在小区尺度的精准农业管理应用提供参考。

关键词: 高光谱, 玉米, 叶面积指数, 地上部生物量, 偏最小二乘回归, 无人机遥感

Abstract:

In order to assess maize growth status accurately and quickly for improving maize precise management, field experiment was conducted in Gongzhuling research station, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jilin province. Experimental design included 3 planting densities and 5 maize materials. The near-ground hyperspectral data and the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) hyperspectral images were obtained when maize were during V11－V12 stage. The application abilities of the hyperspectral data obtained from the two phenotyping platforms were compared and analyzed in the estimation of maize leaf area index (LAI) and aboveground biomass. In this study, 21 commonly used spectral vegetation indices were constructed based on ground hyperspectral data, and then the estimation models of maize LAI and aboveground biomass were established based on ground hyperspectral full-bands, UAV hyperspectral full-bands and vegetation indices and partial least square regression method, respectively. According to the variance estimation of regression coefficients, the important bands of LAI and aboveground biomass were selected, and the partial least square method was also used to establish the estimation model of maize LAI and aboveground biomass based on important bands. The results showed that the canopy spectral reflectance of the same maize material increased with the increase of planting density in the near infrared bands. Among the 5 maize materials under the same planting density, the canopy spectral reflectance of wild type material was the lowest in the visible and near infrared bands. For LAI, the model constructed based on vegetation indices had the best estimation result, with R², RMSE and rRMSE values of 0.70, 0.92 and 15.94%. For aboveground biomass, the model constructed based on the sensitive spectral bands (839－893 nm and 1336－1348 nm) had the best estimation results, with R², RMSE and rRMSE values of 0.71, 12.31 g and 15.89%, which showed that there was information redundancy in hyperspectral bands in the estimation of aboveground biomass, and the estimation accuracy could be improved by reducing the number of spectral bands and selecting sensitive spectral bands. In summary, the UAV hyperspectral images have a good application ability in the estimation of maize LAI and aboveground biomass, and can quickly and effectively extract the parameters information of maize growth. For specific parameters, sensitive spectral bands selected can provide reliable basis for the development and practical application of multi-spectrum in the future. The study can provide a reference for the use of hyperspectral technology in the management of precision agriculture at the community scale.

Key words: hyper-spectrum, maize, leaf area index, aboveground biomass, partial least squares regression, UAV remote sensing

中图分类号:

S127

束美艳, 陈向阳, 王喜庆, 马韫韬. 基于高光谱数据的玉米叶面积指数和生物量评估[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2021, 3(1): 29-39.

SHU Meiyan, CHEN Xiangyang, WANG Xiqing, MA Yuntao. Estimation of Maize Leaf Area Index and Aboveground Biomass Based on Hyperspectral Data[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2021, 3(1): 29-39.

参考文献

1	束美艳, 顾晓鹤, 孙林, 等. 倒伏胁迫下的玉米冠层结构特征变化与光谱响应解析[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(11): 3553-3559.
1	SHU M, GU X, SUN L, et al. Structural characteristics change and spectral response analysis of maize canopy under lodging stress[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2019, 39(11): 3553-3559.
2	周龙飞, 张云鹤, 成枢, 等. 不同生育期倒伏胁迫下玉米叶面积指数高光谱响应解析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2019, 34(4): 766-774.
2	ZHOU L, ZHANG Y, CHENG S, et al. Analysis of hyperspectral response of maize leaf area index under lodging stress under different growth stages[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2019, 34(4): 766-774.
3	潘海珠, 陈仲新. 无人机高光谱遥感数据在冬小麦叶面积指数反演中的应用[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 9(3): 32-37
3	PAN H, CHEN Z. Application of UVA hyperspectral remote sensing in winter wheat leaf area index inversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 9(3): 32-37
4	束美艳, 顾晓鹤, 孙林, 等. 基于新型植被指数的冬小麦LAI高光谱反演[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(18): 3486-3496.
4	SHU M, GU X, SUN L, et al. High spectral inversion of winter wheat LAI based on new vegetation index[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(18): 3486-3496.
5	BENDING J, KANG YU, AASEN H, et al. Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2015, 39: 79-87.
6	李天驰, 冯海宽, 朱贝贝, 等. 基于无人机高光谱和数码影像数据的冬小麦生物量反演[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(20): 1-5.
6	LI T, FENG H, ZHU B, et al. Winter wheat biomass inversion based on UAV hyperspectral and digital image data[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(20): 1-5.
7	BODO M, URS S. Tractor-based quadrilateral spectral reflectance measurements to detect biomass and total aerial nitrogen in winter wheat[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2010, 102(2): 499-506.
8	刘杨, 冯海宽, 孙乾, 等. 基于无人机高光谱分数阶微分的马铃薯地上生物量估算[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(12): 202-211.
8	LIU Y, FENG H, SUN Q, et al. Estimation of potato above-ground biomass based on fractional differential of UAV hyperspectral[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020, 51(12): 202-211.
9	WU C, NIU Z, TANG Q, et al. Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices: Modeling and validation[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148(8): 1230-1241.
10	CROFT H, J M, ZHANG C. The applicability of empirical vegetation indices for determining leaf chlorophyll content over different leaf and canopy structures[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2014, 17: 119-130.
11	程雪, 贺炳彦, 黄耀欢, 等. 基于无人机高光谱数据的玉米叶面积指数估算[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2019, 34(4): 775-784.
11	CHENG X, HE B, HUANG Y, et al. Estimation of corn leaf area index based on UAV hyperspectral image[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2019, 34(4): 775-784.
12	常潇月, 常庆瑞, 王晓凡, 等. 基于无人机高光谱影像玉米叶绿素含量估算[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(1): 66-73.
12	CHANG X, CHANG Q, WANG X, et al. Estimation of maize leaf chlorophyll contents based on UAV hyperspectral drone image[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(1): 66-73.
13	ZHOU Y, JIANG M. Comparison of inversion method of maize leaf area index based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020(79): 16385-16401.
14	田明璐, 班松涛, 常庆瑞, 等. 基于低空无人机成像光谱仪影像估算棉花叶面积指数[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(21): 102-108.
14	TIAN M, BAN S, CHANG Q, et al. Use of hyperspectral images from UAV-based imaging spectroradiometer to estimate cotton leaf area index[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(21): 102-108.
15	田明璐, 班松涛, 常庆瑞, 等. 基于无人机成像光谱仪数据的棉花叶绿素含量反演[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(11): 285-293.
15	TIAN M, BAN S, CHANG Q, et al. Estimation of SPAD value of cotton leaf using hyperspectral images from UAV-based imaging spectroradiometer[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2016, 47(11): 285-293.
16	陶惠林, 冯海宽, 杨贵军, 等. 基于无人机成像高光谱影像的冬小麦LAI估测[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(1): 176-187.
16	TAO H, FENG H, YANG G, et al. Leaf area index estimation of winter wheat based on UAV imaging hyperspectral imagery[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020, 51(1): 176-187.
17	陶惠林, 徐良骥, 冯海宽, 等. 基于无人机高光谱遥感的冬小麦株高和叶面积指数估算[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(12): 193-201.
17	TAO H, XU L, FENG H, et al. Estimation of plant height and leaf area index of winter wheat based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020, 51(12): 193-201.
18	陶惠林, 冯海宽, 徐良骥, 等. 基于无人机高光谱遥感数据的冬小麦生物量估算[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(5): 1154-1162.
18	TAO H, FENG H, XU L, et al. Winter wheat biomass estimation based on hyperspectral remote sensing data of unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV)[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 36(5): 1154-1162.
19	陶惠林, 徐良骥, 冯海宽, 等. 基于无人机高光谱长势指标的冬小麦长势监测[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(2): 180-191.
19	TAO H, XU L, FENG H, et al. Monitoring of winter wheat growth based on UAV hyperspectral growth index[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020, 51(2): 180-191.
20	陶惠林, 徐良骥, 冯海宽, 等. 基于无人机高光谱遥感数据的冬小麦产量估算[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(7): 146-155.
20	TAO H, XU L, FENG H, et al. Winter wheat yield estimation based on UAV hyperspectral remote sensing data[J]. Transactions of the CSAM, 2020, 51(7): 146-155.
21	陶惠林, 冯海宽, 杨贵军, 等. 基于无人机数码影像和高光谱数据的冬小麦产量估算对比[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(23): 111-118.
21	TAO H, FENG H, YANG G, et al. Comparison of winter wheat yields estimated with UAV digital image and hyperspectral data[J]. Transactions of the CASE, 2019, 35(23): 111-118.
22	LI Z, LI Z, FAIRBAIRN D, et al. Multi-LUTs method for canopy nitrogen density estimation in winter wheat by field and UAV hyperspectral[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 162: 174-182.
23	秦占飞, 常庆瑞, 谢宝妮, 等. 基于无人机高光谱影像的引黄灌区水稻叶片全氮含量估测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(23): 77-85.
23	QIN Z, CHANG Q, XIE B, et al. Rice leaf nitrogen content estimation based on hyperspectral imagery of UAV in Yellow River diversion irrigation district[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(23): 77-85.
24	DRISS H, JOHN R. MILLER N,et al. Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2): 416-426.
25	ZARCO-TFJADA P, MILLER J, MORALES A, et al. Hyperspectral indices and model simulation for chlorophyll estimation in open-canopy tree crops[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 90(4): 463-476.
26	LE G, MAIRE C, FRANCOIS E, et al. Towards universal broad leaf chlorophyll indices using PROSPECT simulated database and hyperspectral reflectance measurements[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 89(1): 1-28.
27	ANATOLY A, GITRLSION Y, KAUFMAN M, et al. Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 58(3): 289-298.
28	CWU C, NIU Z, TANG Q, et al. Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices: Modeling and validation[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148(8): 1230-1241.
29	SIMS D, GANMON J. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2): 337-354.
30	DASH J, CURRAN P. The MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 25(23): 5403-5413.
31	HANSEN P, SCHJOERRING J. Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 86(4): 542-553.
32	CHU X, GUO Y, HE J, et al. Comparison of different hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimating canopy leaf nitrogen accumulation in rice[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2014, 106(5): 1911-1920.
33	FAVA F, COLOMBO R, BOCCHI S, et al. Identification of hyperspectral vegetation indices for Mediterranean pasture characterization[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2009, 11(4): 233-243.
34	BISUN D. Remote sensing of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a+b, and total carotenoid content in eucalyptus leaves[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 66(2): 111-121.
35	STEDDOM K, HEIDEL G, JONES D, et al. Remote detection of rhizomania in sugar beets[J]. Phytopathology, 2003, 93(6): 720-726.
36	GITELSON A, MERZLYAK M N. Quantitative estimation of chlorophyll-a using reflectance spectra: Experiments with autumn chestnut and maple leaves[J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology, 1994, 22(3): 247-252.
37	MAIRAJ D, JIN M, SADEED H, et al. Estimation of dynamic canopy variables using hyperspectral derived vegetation indices under varying N rates at diverse phenological stages of rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 9: ID 1883.
38	薛利红, 曹卫星, 罗卫红, 等.小麦叶片氮素状况与光谱特性的相关性研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(2): 172-177.
38	XUE L, CAO W, LUO W, et al. Correlation between leaf nitrogen status and canopy spectral characteristics in wheat[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2004, 28(2): 172-177.
39	QUENOUILLE M. Approximate tests of correlation in time-series[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 1949, 11(1): 68-84.
40	MENG B, SKIDMORE A K, SCHLERF M, et al. Predicting foliar biochemistry of tea (Camellia sinensis) using reflectance spectra measured at powder, leaf and canopy levels[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2013, 78: 148-156.

[1]	刘丽琪, 魏广源, 周萍. 基于机器学习优化建模的GF-5影像土壤总氮量预测填图[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(5): 61-73.
[2]	刘伊, 张彦军. ReluformerN：轻量化高低频增强高光谱农业地物分类方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(5): 74-87.
[3]	张京, 赵泽瑄, 赵艳茹, 卜泓超, 吴星宇. 基于Bi-GRU和空-谱信息融合的油菜菌核病侵染区域高光谱图像分割方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 40-48.
[4]	沈艳艳, 赵玉涛, 陈庚申, 吕振刚, 赵峰, 杨万能, 孟冉. 玉米典型叶部病害高光谱识别及其烈度分类[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2024, 6(2): 28-39.
[5]	李政凯, 于嘉辉, 潘时佳, 贾泽丰, 牛子杰. 冬季猕猴桃树单木骨架提取与冠层生长预测方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(4): 92-104.
[6]	王敬湧, 张明珍, 凌华荣, 王梓廷, 盖倞尧. 干旱胁迫下玉米叶片叶绿素含量与含水量高光谱成像反演方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 142-153.
[7]	左昊轩, 黄祺成, 杨佳昊, 孟繁佳, 李思恩, 李莉. 基于双目视觉和改进YOLOv8的玉米茎秆宽度原位识别方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 86-95.
[8]	刘易雪, 宋育阳, 崔萍, 房玉林, 苏宝峰. 基于无人机遥感和深度学习的葡萄卷叶病感染程度诊断方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(3): 49-61.
[9]	赖佳政, 李贝贝, 程翔, 孙丰, 陈炬廷, 王晶, 张芊, 叶协锋. 基于无人机高光谱遥感的烤烟叶片叶绿素含量估测[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2023, 5(2): 68-81.
[10]	刘晓航, 张昭, 刘嘉滢, 张漫, 李寒, FLORES Paulo, 韩雄哲. 基于多种深度学习算法的田间玉米籽粒检测与计数[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(4): 49-60.
[11]	付虹雨, 王薇, 廖澳, 岳云开, 许明志, 王梓薇, 陈建福, 佘玮, 崔国贤. 基于无人机遥感表型监测的苎麻优质种质资源筛选方法[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(4): 74-83.
[12]	许钰林, 康孟珍, 王秀娟, 华净, 王浩宇, 沈震. 基于深度学习的玉米和大豆期货价格智能预测[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(4): 156-163.
[13]	范承志, 王梓文, 杨兴超, 罗永开, 徐学欣, 郭斌, 李振海. 基于地物高光谱和无人机多光谱的黄河三角洲土壤盐分机器学习反演模型[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(4): 61-73.
[14]	张志博, 赵西宁, 高晓东, 张利, 杨孟豪. 基于改进Linknet网络的黄土高原苹果园精准提取[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(3): 95-107.
[15]	李双伟, 朱俊奇, EVERS Jochem B., VAN DER WERF Wopke, 郭焱, 李保国, 马韫韬. 基于植物功能-结构模型的玉米-大豆条带间作光截获行间差异研究[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2022, 4(1): 97-109.

基于高光谱数据的玉米叶面积指数和生物量评估

Estimation of Maize Leaf Area Index and Aboveground Biomass Based on Hyperspectral Data

在线阅读

知网下载

本地下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价